Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
HK HK is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,635
Default Too Dangerous for Safe Boating!

Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:38:25 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

These guys just don't get it...

Of course they "got it".

Beautiful boat, big time high tech engine - quiet, efficient,
reliable.


Level flotation also...



And if you stand in the stern, the scuppers are entirely underwater,
instead of halfway under...

But I do agree, these are tough boats.

  #12   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,649
Default Too Dangerous for Safe Boating!

On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:33:54 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:38:25 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

These guys just don't get it...


Of course they "got it".

Beautiful boat, big time high tech engine - quiet, efficient,
reliable.


Level flotation also...


Must be the lighter high tech two stroke quiet, efficient and reliable
outboard engine.

Not like some Plain Jane ancient technology outboard engine.
  #13   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
HK HK is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,635
Default Too Dangerous for Safe Boating!

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:33:54 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:38:25 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

These guys just don't get it...
Of course they "got it".

Beautiful boat, big time high tech engine - quiet, efficient,
reliable.

Level flotation also...


Must be the lighter high tech two stroke quiet, efficient and reliable
outboard engine.

Not like some Plain Jane ancient technology outboard engine.



Lighter? The 225 etec weighs 520 pounds. The Yamaha two stroke weighs
540 pounds. D'oh.

  #14   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,649
Default Too Dangerous for Safe Boating!

On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:48:46 -0400, HK wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:33:54 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:38:25 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

These guys just don't get it...
Of course they "got it".

Beautiful boat, big time high tech engine - quiet, efficient,
reliable.
Level flotation also...


Must be the lighter high tech two stroke quiet, efficient and reliable
outboard engine.

Not like some Plain Jane ancient technology outboard engine.


Lighter? The 225 etec weighs 520 pounds. The Yamaha two stroke weighs
540 pounds. D'oh.


Harry - relax.

You've got a nice boat and you should be proud of it.

Just yanking your chain a little.
  #15   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
HK HK is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,635
Default Too Dangerous for Safe Boating!

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:48:46 -0400, HK wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:33:54 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:38:25 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

These guys just don't get it...
Of course they "got it".

Beautiful boat, big time high tech engine - quiet, efficient,
reliable.
Level flotation also...
Must be the lighter high tech two stroke quiet, efficient and reliable
outboard engine.

Not like some Plain Jane ancient technology outboard engine.

Lighter? The 225 etec weighs 520 pounds. The Yamaha two stroke weighs
540 pounds. D'oh.


Harry - relax.

You've got a nice boat and you should be proud of it.

Just yanking your chain a little.



I know that. I'm yanking yours. Poor old Ole must be rolling in his grave.


  #16   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,536
Default Too Dangerous for Safe Boating!

On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 08:14:17 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:

LOL, Harry you sure seem to be hung up on this transom thing.


You noticed that also. Methinks he is a mite sensitive perhaps.

Not to worry though, Harry has told us many times how experienced he
is and there's no reason to doubt it that I know of.

http://www.newsargus.com/news/archiv...escued_at_sea/


  #17   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
HK HK is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,635
Default Too Dangerous for Safe Boating!

Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 08:14:17 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:

LOL, Harry you sure seem to be hung up on this transom thing.


You noticed that also. Methinks he is a mite sensitive perhaps.

Not to worry though, Harry has told us many times how experienced he
is and there's no reason to doubt it that I know of.

http://www.newsargus.com/news/archiv...escued_at_sea/




Ahh, yes, boating accidents. So, how long will that barge of yours float
if it is holed while you are, say, 23 miles out in the Atlantic? What's
that, no flotation at all? Sink like a stone? :}
  #18   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,310
Default Too Dangerous for Safe Boating!

On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:42:31 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 08:14:17 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:

LOL, Harry you sure seem to be hung up on this transom thing.


You noticed that also. Methinks he is a mite sensitive perhaps.

You might think that. I tend to think that Harry just enjoys kicking
ass. Pretty funny seeing him tossing around a ten-man tag team
by his lonesome.

--Vic
  #19   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
HK HK is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,635
Default Too Dangerous for Safe Boating!

Vic Smith wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:42:31 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 08:14:17 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:

LOL, Harry you sure seem to be hung up on this transom thing.

You noticed that also. Methinks he is a mite sensitive perhaps.

You might think that. I tend to think that Harry just enjoys kicking
ass. Pretty funny seeing him tossing around a ten-man tag team
by his lonesome.

--Vic



:} Hey...no fair letting my secret out of the bag!
  #20   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,536
Default Too Dangerous for Safe Boating!

On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:03:36 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

LOL, Harry you sure seem to be hung up on this transom thing.


You noticed that also. Methinks he is a mite sensitive perhaps.

You might think that. I tend to think that Harry just enjoys kicking
ass. Pretty funny seeing him tossing around a ten-man tag team
by his lonesome.


Do not confuse name calling and dancing around an important issue with
"kicking butt".

Harry's boating with Cleopatra: Right in d' Nile.

Whenever you see clouds of smoke there's fire somewhere.

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Safe boating is no accident Joe ASA 5 July 7th 06 01:05 AM
free safe boating class BELGRADE ,MAINE roemax General 2 April 6th 06 06:56 PM
Boating is Dangerous, & that's no Croc! Dan J.S. General 0 March 22nd 06 01:55 PM
Boating is Dangerous, & that's no Croc! Reggie Smithers General 0 March 22nd 06 12:57 PM
Safe Boating Reminders from the USCG [email protected] General 5 July 1st 05 05:16 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:27 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017