Too Dangerous for Safe Boating!
 

Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:38:25 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

These guys just don't get it...
Of course they "got it".

Beautiful boat, big time high tech engine - quiet, efficient,
reliable.

Level flotation also...


And if you stand in the stern, the scuppers are entirely underwater,
instead of halfway under...

But I do agree, these are tough boats.

Too Dangerous for Safe Boating!
 

On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:33:54 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:38:25 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

These guys just don't get it...

Of course they "got it".

Beautiful boat, big time high tech engine - quiet, efficient,
reliable.

Level flotation also...

Must be the lighter high tech two stroke quiet, efficient and reliable
outboard engine.

Not like some Plain Jane ancient technology outboard engine.

Too Dangerous for Safe Boating!
 

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:33:54 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:38:25 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

These guys just don't get it...
Of course they "got it".

Beautiful boat, big time high tech engine - quiet, efficient,
reliable.
Level flotation also...

Must be the lighter high tech two stroke quiet, efficient and reliable
outboard engine.

Not like some Plain Jane ancient technology outboard engine.


Lighter? The 225 etec weighs 520 pounds. The Yamaha two stroke weighs
540 pounds. D'oh.

Too Dangerous for Safe Boating!
 

On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:48:46 -0400, HK wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:33:54 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:38:25 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

These guys just don't get it...
Of course they "got it".

Beautiful boat, big time high tech engine - quiet, efficient,
reliable.
Level flotation also...

Must be the lighter high tech two stroke quiet, efficient and reliable
outboard engine.

Not like some Plain Jane ancient technology outboard engine.

Lighter? The 225 etec weighs 520 pounds. The Yamaha two stroke weighs
540 pounds. D'oh.

Harry - relax.

You've got a nice boat and you should be proud of it.

Just yanking your chain a little.

Too Dangerous for Safe Boating!
 

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:48:46 -0400, HK wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:33:54 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:38:25 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

These guys just don't get it...
Of course they "got it".

Beautiful boat, big time high tech engine - quiet, efficient,
reliable.
Level flotation also...
Must be the lighter high tech two stroke quiet, efficient and reliable
outboard engine.

Not like some Plain Jane ancient technology outboard engine.
Lighter? The 225 etec weighs 520 pounds. The Yamaha two stroke weighs
540 pounds. D'oh.

Harry - relax.

You've got a nice boat and you should be proud of it.

Just yanking your chain a little.


I know that. I'm yanking yours. Poor old Ole must be rolling in his grave.

Too Dangerous for Safe Boating!
 

On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 08:14:17 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:

LOL, Harry you sure seem to be hung up on this transom thing.

You noticed that also. Methinks he is a mite sensitive perhaps.

Not to worry though, Harry has told us many times how experienced he
is and there's no reason to doubt it that I know of.

http://www.newsargus.com/news/archiv...escued_at_sea/

Too Dangerous for Safe Boating!
 

Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 08:14:17 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:

LOL, Harry you sure seem to be hung up on this transom thing.

You noticed that also. Methinks he is a mite sensitive perhaps.

Not to worry though, Harry has told us many times how experienced he
is and there's no reason to doubt it that I know of.

http://www.newsargus.com/news/archiv...escued_at_sea/




Ahh, yes, boating accidents. So, how long will that barge of yours float
if it is holed while you are, say, 23 miles out in the Atlantic? What's
that, no flotation at all? Sink like a stone? :}

Too Dangerous for Safe Boating!
 

On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:42:31 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 08:14:17 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:

LOL, Harry you sure seem to be hung up on this transom thing.

You noticed that also. Methinks he is a mite sensitive perhaps.

You might think that. I tend to think that Harry just enjoys kicking
ass. Pretty funny seeing him tossing around a ten-man tag team
by his lonesome.

--Vic

Too Dangerous for Safe Boating!
 

Vic Smith wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:42:31 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 08:14:17 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:

LOL, Harry you sure seem to be hung up on this transom thing.
You noticed that also. Methinks he is a mite sensitive perhaps.

You might think that. I tend to think that Harry just enjoys kicking
ass. Pretty funny seeing him tossing around a ten-man tag team
by his lonesome.

--Vic


:} Hey...no fair letting my secret out of the bag!

Too Dangerous for Safe Boating!
 

On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:03:36 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

LOL, Harry you sure seem to be hung up on this transom thing.

You noticed that also. Methinks he is a mite sensitive perhaps.

You might think that. I tend to think that Harry just enjoys kicking
ass. Pretty funny seeing him tossing around a ten-man tag team
by his lonesome.

Do not confuse name calling and dancing around an important issue with
"kicking butt".

Harry's boating with Cleopatra: Right in d' Nile.

Whenever you see clouds of smoke there's fire somewhere.