| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#24
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
"thunder" wrote in message news ![]() On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 06:30:40 -0400, JimH wrote: Why should the insurance company extend *liability* coverage to a 3rd party? Ask State Farm, they had been doing it. It seems the OP's umbrella just became a parasol. That avoids the question. I ask again......why should an insurance company extend liability coverage to a 3rd party? State Farm corrected a mistake and did the right thing. The insured is still protected by the umbrella policy. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Wash State Mandatory Boater Education Bill clears state senate: | General | |||
| hatch umbrella | Cruising | |||