Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "thunder" wrote in message news ![]() On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 06:30:40 -0400, JimH wrote: Why should the insurance company extend *liability* coverage to a 3rd party? Ask State Farm, they had been doing it. It seems the OP's umbrella just became a parasol. That avoids the question. I ask again......why should an insurance company extend liability coverage to a 3rd party? State Farm corrected a mistake and did the right thing. The insured is still protected by the umbrella policy. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Wash State Mandatory Boater Education Bill clears state senate: | General | |||
hatch umbrella | Cruising |