Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... "JimH" ask wrote in message ... "Hamish" wrote in message ink.net... I am in California. I just got the renewal bill for my personal umbrella policy, and the "Important Notice" brochure that always comes with it said, "The definition of insured is revised so that a person or organization using an insured's auto, RV or watercraft is no longer covered." So, when I let a valet park my car, he's not covered. If I loan my car to a friend, relative, or neighbor, they're not covered. If my ski boat was running - it isn't right now - and I let a friend drive it to tow me, he's not covered. (Yes, I know that my "underlying" car insurance covers them up to the limits of that policy, but those limits are only enough to pay for a stubbed toe.) (clipped) But how does your auto policy cover your watercraft. My insurance agent recently pointed out to me that although my homeowners policy specifically covers a boat up to 14 ft and under 25 hp, that's only while being used in a body of water totally on my property (my swimming pool, maybe?), my boat being used on the navigable river in front of my place is no longer covered as soon as I pull away from my dock. They really want you to spend money to cover each and every thing you might drive even though you can't drive more than one vehicle, etc at a time. Furthermore, I would imagine that their reason to specifically write in the policy that no other person using the vehicle would be covered is to prevent the lawyers from looking for the "deepest" pocket to sue in the event of an accident. Tom G. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Wash State Mandatory Boater Education Bill clears state senate: | General | |||
hatch umbrella | Cruising |