Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Hamish" wrote in message ink.net... I am in California. I just got the renewal bill for my personal umbrella policy, and the "Important Notice" brochure that always comes with it said, "The definition of insured is revised so that a person or organization using an insured's auto, RV or watercraft is no longer covered." So, when I let a valet park my car, he's not covered. If I loan my car to a friend, relative, or neighbor, they're not covered. If my ski boat was running - it isn't right now - and I let a friend drive it to tow me, he's not covered. (Yes, I know that my "underlying" car insurance covers them up to the limits of that policy, but those limits are only enough to pay for a stubbed toe.) I called my agent and she was totally unaware of the change, and asked me to fax her a copy of the brochure. Then, once she called the underwriters, she still seemed unconcerned. She was happy to quote me the increase in premiums to bring each of my car polcies up to the same limits that were formerly covered by the Umbrella. An additional $206 per year. I will pay the money, because I own a home and it is vital that I remain insured up to a high limit. I have taken the trouble to write this post because I think that a lot of other people will fail to read the "Important Notice" (the brochure is 17 pages long), will simply write the check like they do every other year, and will end up with a big gap in their coverage. And their insurance agent won't take the trouble to call them or write them a personal letter telling about the big gap that just opened up in their coverage. So, look out! And warn your friends. Ham 1. The valet company should have their own insurance. 2. Don't loan your car or boat to anyone outside your family. 3. Why should the insurance company cover anyone but you and your family? So what is the big deal? |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... "JimH" ask wrote in message ... "Hamish" wrote in message ink.net... I am in California. I just got the renewal bill for my personal umbrella policy, and the "Important Notice" brochure that always comes with it said, "The definition of insured is revised so that a person or organization using an insured's auto, RV or watercraft is no longer covered." So, when I let a valet park my car, he's not covered. If I loan my car to a friend, relative, or neighbor, they're not covered. If my ski boat was running - it isn't right now - and I let a friend drive it to tow me, he's not covered. (Yes, I know that my "underlying" car insurance covers them up to the limits of that policy, but those limits are only enough to pay for a stubbed toe.) (clipped) But how does your auto policy cover your watercraft. My insurance agent recently pointed out to me that although my homeowners policy specifically covers a boat up to 14 ft and under 25 hp, that's only while being used in a body of water totally on my property (my swimming pool, maybe?), my boat being used on the navigable river in front of my place is no longer covered as soon as I pull away from my dock. They really want you to spend money to cover each and every thing you might drive even though you can't drive more than one vehicle, etc at a time. Furthermore, I would imagine that their reason to specifically write in the policy that no other person using the vehicle would be covered is to prevent the lawyers from looking for the "deepest" pocket to sue in the event of an accident. Tom G. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "akheel" wrote in message ... Gene Kearns wrote in : On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:21:12 -0400, "JimH" ask penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: "Hamish" wrote in message thlink.net... I am in California. I just got the renewal bill for my personal umbrella policy, and the "Important Notice" brochure that always comes with it said, "The definition of insured is revised so that a person or organization using an insured's auto, RV or watercraft is no longer covered." So, when I let a valet park my car, he's not covered. If I loan my car to a friend, relative, or neighbor, they're not covered. If my ski boat was running - it isn't right now - and I let a friend drive it to tow me, he's not covered. (Yes, I know that my "underlying" car insurance covers them up to the limits of that policy, but those limits are only enough to pay for a stubbed toe.) I called my agent and she was totally unaware of the change, and asked me to fax her a copy of the brochure. Then, once she called the underwriters, she still seemed unconcerned. She was happy to quote me the increase in premiums to bring each of my car polcies up to the same limits that were formerly covered by the Umbrella. An additional $206 per year. I will pay the money, because I own a home and it is vital that I remain insured up to a high limit. I have taken the trouble to write this post because I think that a lot of other people will fail to read the "Important Notice" (the brochure is 17 pages long), will simply write the check like they do every other year, and will end up with a big gap in their coverage. And their insurance agent won't take the trouble to call them or write them a personal letter telling about the big gap that just opened up in their coverage. So, look out! And warn your friends. Ham 1. The valet company should have their own insurance. *You* pay insurance premiums to make sure *you* are covered. Don't assume that anybody else has you covered (they don't, though they may try to indemnify themselves). If you have to take them to court, be sure that you can afford all of the justice that you feel you are entitled to.... 2. Don't loan your car or boat to anyone outside your family. Ok, I'll buy that, but it doesn't cover any non-loaner legitimate use of your vehicle. Boats? Marina re-positioning your boat to another slip (see? says they can do it in the lease agreement..... Personal injury? You have a dangerous boat! Damage? See no evil, hear no evil...... see #1 above) 3. Why should the insurance company cover anyone but you and your family? Because there *are* no-loaner issues to be dealt with.... So what is the big deal? You have equity that other people want.... it really is a BIG DEAL! While admittedly, I don't have the policy you are describing, so I can't read it, I think you are misconstruing the change. What State Farm is saying I believe is that your friend who borrows your boat is no longer an insured on the umbrella, so if he borrows it and kills someone, no insurance for him, at least from State Farm. But that doesn't mean that you aren't still an insured if someone sues you as the owner of the boat (they would probably claim you were negligent to loan the boat to someone so obviously unskilled). You are still an insured. Same with the car. In California, car owners are liable for injuries caused by their car no matter what, even if not negligent and not driving, up to $15K for injury to one person and $30K for injury to multiple persons and $5K for property damange. Thus if you loan your car to someone who causes an injury or damage, your auto insurance will cover you up to these limits (by law). But if the umbrella insurance company made your friend an insured, they would have to pay up to the limits of the insurance, because your friend's liablility (assuming he is found to be the negligent driver)is not limited. So by eliminating your friend as an insured, they limit their liability. It's really your friend who is screwed here, not you. Moral of the story, YOU should never borrow someone else's car or boat unless you are sure YOUR insurace covers you. California minimum insurance is 15/30 (I think it is 20/40 now). But if you own the car and own a house and stock, you will be sued for those items by the killed persons heirs. You have the deep pockets and are the owner of the car. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Calif Bill" wrote in
ink.net: "akheel" wrote in message ... Gene Kearns wrote in : On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:21:12 -0400, "JimH" ask penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: "Hamish" wrote in message rthlink.net... I am in California. I just got the renewal bill for my personal umbrella policy, and the "Important Notice" brochure that always comes with it said, "The definition of insured is revised so that a person or organization using an insured's auto, RV or watercraft is no longer covered." So, when I let a valet park my car, he's not covered. If I loan my car to a friend, relative, or neighbor, they're not covered. If my ski boat was running - it isn't right now - and I let a friend drive it to tow me, he's not covered. (Yes, I know that my "underlying" car insurance covers them up to the limits of that policy, but those limits are only enough to pay for a stubbed toe.) I called my agent and she was totally unaware of the change, and asked me to fax her a copy of the brochure. Then, once she called the underwriters, she still seemed unconcerned. She was happy to quote me the increase in premiums to bring each of my car polcies up to the same limits that were formerly covered by the Umbrella. An additional $206 per year. I will pay the money, because I own a home and it is vital that I remain insured up to a high limit. I have taken the trouble to write this post because I think that a lot of other people will fail to read the "Important Notice" (the brochure is 17 pages long), will simply write the check like they do every other year, and will end up with a big gap in their coverage. And their insurance agent won't take the trouble to call them or write them a personal letter telling about the big gap that just opened up in their coverage. So, look out! And warn your friends. Ham 1. The valet company should have their own insurance. *You* pay insurance premiums to make sure *you* are covered. Don't assume that anybody else has you covered (they don't, though they may try to indemnify themselves). If you have to take them to court, be sure that you can afford all of the justice that you feel you are entitled to.... 2. Don't loan your car or boat to anyone outside your family. Ok, I'll buy that, but it doesn't cover any non-loaner legitimate use of your vehicle. Boats? Marina re-positioning your boat to another slip (see? says they can do it in the lease agreement..... Personal injury? You have a dangerous boat! Damage? See no evil, hear no evil...... see #1 above) 3. Why should the insurance company cover anyone but you and your family? Because there *are* no-loaner issues to be dealt with.... So what is the big deal? You have equity that other people want.... it really is a BIG DEAL! While admittedly, I don't have the policy you are describing, so I can't read it, I think you are misconstruing the change. What State Farm is saying I believe is that your friend who borrows your boat is no longer an insured on the umbrella, so if he borrows it and kills someone, no insurance for him, at least from State Farm. But that doesn't mean that you aren't still an insured if someone sues you as the owner of the boat (they would probably claim you were negligent to loan the boat to someone so obviously unskilled). You are still an insured. Same with the car. In California, car owners are liable for injuries caused by their car no matter what, even if not negligent and not driving, up to $15K for injury to one person and $30K for injury to multiple persons and $5K for property damange. Thus if you loan your car to someone who causes an injury or damage, your auto insurance will cover you up to these limits (by law). But if the umbrella insurance company made your friend an insured, they would have to pay up to the limits of the insurance, because your friend's liablility (assuming he is found to be the negligent driver)is not limited. So by eliminating your friend as an insured, they limit their liability. It's really your friend who is screwed here, not you. Moral of the story, YOU should never borrow someone else's car or boat unless you are sure YOUR insurace covers you. California minimum insurance is 15/30 (I think it is 20/40 now). But if you own the car and own a house and stock, you will be sued for those items by the killed persons heirs. You have the deep pockets and are the owner of the car. Yes, agree completely. But the original poster's complaint was his belief that by excluding a friend who borrows his car as an "insured" under his umbrella policy, that somehow left the O.P exposed. The O.P is still covered when the inevitable lawsuit comes, his friend is not. So increasing the limits on his underlying policies is a complete waste of money as far as coverage on himself is concerned. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "akheel" wrote in message ... "Calif Bill" wrote in ink.net: "akheel" wrote in message ... Gene Kearns wrote in : On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:21:12 -0400, "JimH" ask penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: "Hamish" wrote in message arthlink.net... I am in California. I just got the renewal bill for my personal umbrella policy, and the "Important Notice" brochure that always comes with it said, "The definition of insured is revised so that a person or organization using an insured's auto, RV or watercraft is no longer covered." So, when I let a valet park my car, he's not covered. If I loan my car to a friend, relative, or neighbor, they're not covered. If my ski boat was running - it isn't right now - and I let a friend drive it to tow me, he's not covered. (Yes, I know that my "underlying" car insurance covers them up to the limits of that policy, but those limits are only enough to pay for a stubbed toe.) I called my agent and she was totally unaware of the change, and asked me to fax her a copy of the brochure. Then, once she called the underwriters, she still seemed unconcerned. She was happy to quote me the increase in premiums to bring each of my car polcies up to the same limits that were formerly covered by the Umbrella. An additional $206 per year. I will pay the money, because I own a home and it is vital that I remain insured up to a high limit. I have taken the trouble to write this post because I think that a lot of other people will fail to read the "Important Notice" (the brochure is 17 pages long), will simply write the check like they do every other year, and will end up with a big gap in their coverage. And their insurance agent won't take the trouble to call them or write them a personal letter telling about the big gap that just opened up in their coverage. So, look out! And warn your friends. Ham 1. The valet company should have their own insurance. *You* pay insurance premiums to make sure *you* are covered. Don't assume that anybody else has you covered (they don't, though they may try to indemnify themselves). If you have to take them to court, be sure that you can afford all of the justice that you feel you are entitled to.... 2. Don't loan your car or boat to anyone outside your family. Ok, I'll buy that, but it doesn't cover any non-loaner legitimate use of your vehicle. Boats? Marina re-positioning your boat to another slip (see? says they can do it in the lease agreement..... Personal injury? You have a dangerous boat! Damage? See no evil, hear no evil...... see #1 above) 3. Why should the insurance company cover anyone but you and your family? Because there *are* no-loaner issues to be dealt with.... So what is the big deal? You have equity that other people want.... it really is a BIG DEAL! While admittedly, I don't have the policy you are describing, so I can't read it, I think you are misconstruing the change. What State Farm is saying I believe is that your friend who borrows your boat is no longer an insured on the umbrella, so if he borrows it and kills someone, no insurance for him, at least from State Farm. But that doesn't mean that you aren't still an insured if someone sues you as the owner of the boat (they would probably claim you were negligent to loan the boat to someone so obviously unskilled). You are still an insured. Same with the car. In California, car owners are liable for injuries caused by their car no matter what, even if not negligent and not driving, up to $15K for injury to one person and $30K for injury to multiple persons and $5K for property damange. Thus if you loan your car to someone who causes an injury or damage, your auto insurance will cover you up to these limits (by law). But if the umbrella insurance company made your friend an insured, they would have to pay up to the limits of the insurance, because your friend's liablility (assuming he is found to be the negligent driver)is not limited. So by eliminating your friend as an insured, they limit their liability. It's really your friend who is screwed here, not you. Moral of the story, YOU should never borrow someone else's car or boat unless you are sure YOUR insurace covers you. California minimum insurance is 15/30 (I think it is 20/40 now). But if you own the car and own a house and stock, you will be sued for those items by the killed persons heirs. You have the deep pockets and are the owner of the car. Yes, agree completely. But the original poster's complaint was his belief that by excluding a friend who borrows his car as an "insured" under his umbrella policy, that somehow left the O.P exposed. The O.P is still covered when the inevitable lawsuit comes, his friend is not. So increasing the limits on his underlying policies is a complete waste of money as far as coverage on himself is concerned. BINGO! Give that man a ceegar! |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gene Kearns" wrote in message ... On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 06:29:07 -0400, "JimH" ask wrote: Yes, agree completely. But the original poster's complaint was his belief that by excluding a friend who borrows his car as an "insured" under his umbrella policy, that somehow left the O.P exposed. The O.P is still covered when the inevitable lawsuit comes, his friend is not. So increasing the limits on his underlying policies is a complete waste of money as far as coverage on himself is concerned. BINGO! Give that man a ceegar! Ok..... then, is the friend covered by any sort of insurance that *he* purchased? -- Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC. I will defer this for Calf Bill to answer based on his expertise in the area of personal insurance. Let's see what he has to say on this. ;-) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Wash State Mandatory Boater Education Bill clears state senate: | General | |||
hatch umbrella | Cruising |