"HK" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...

All major corporations want these days is the cheapest possible
workforce, and if that means exporting jobs to China or India, so be it.
The righties think this is "good" for our economy, but it will do us in
sooner rather than later.

The only hope is to elect a president and congress in 2008 who will do
something to stem the flow of jobs. Those are more likely to be
democrats than republicans.

Baloney. Duncan Hunter is about as protectionist as you can get.

My personal pick is Mitt Romney.





Duncan Hunter has about as much chance as either of us to be nominated.
Your nominee will be Guiliani, Romney, or Tired Old Fred.

Hunter will be the VP candidate, and if he isn't he should.



Is Mitt for the war in Iraq, or against it? Or was he for it and is he now
against it? Mr. Flip-Flop..,he'll be fun to Swiftboat.

You guys might shoot your load too early trying to swiftboat Mitt. The only
position that he has "flip-flopped" on is abortion...and pointing out that
that he now takes a pro-life stance after taking a pro-choice stance in
order to win the governorship in MA only solidifies his standing in the
Republican primary.

You should save the flip-flop accusations for *if and when* he becomes the
nominee. It might sell well during a general election with independents
who are pro-choice. But it's not going to sell well with Republicans who
are glad he has "finally seen the light".

Democrats are scared of Romney. He has managed to steal the health care
issue with Romneycare. He is smart, articulate, accomplished, and good
looking. The man has also led a life that is beyond reproach. They'll be
no dirty tricks or last-minute skeletons for an October surprise.

I guess that's why the Dems are sending their attack dogs at the Boston
Globe against him.

NOYB wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...

All major corporations want these days is the cheapest possible
workforce, and if that means exporting jobs to China or India, so be it.
The righties think this is "good" for our economy, but it will do us in
sooner rather than later.

The only hope is to elect a president and congress in 2008 who will do
something to stem the flow of jobs. Those are more likely to be
democrats than republicans.
Baloney. Duncan Hunter is about as protectionist as you can get.

My personal pick is Mitt Romney.




Duncan Hunter has about as much chance as either of us to be nominated.
Your nominee will be Guiliani, Romney, or Tired Old Fred.

Hunter will be the VP candidate, and if he isn't he should.


Is Mitt for the war in Iraq, or against it? Or was he for it and is he now
against it? Mr. Flip-Flop..,he'll be fun to Swiftboat.

You guys might shoot your load too early trying to swiftboat Mitt. The only
position that he has "flip-flopped" on is abortion...and pointing out that
that he now takes a pro-life stance after taking a pro-choice stance in
order to win the governorship in MA only solidifies his standing in the
Republican primary.

You should save the flip-flop accusations for *if and when* he becomes the
nominee. It might sell well during a general election with independents
who are pro-choice. But it's not going to sell well with Republicans who
are glad he has "finally seen the light".

Democrats are scared of Romney. He has managed to steal the health care
issue with Romneycare. He is smart, articulate, accomplished, and good
looking. The man has also led a life that is beyond reproach. They'll be
no dirty tricks or last-minute skeletons for an October surprise.

I guess that's why the Dems are sending their attack dogs at the Boston
Globe against him.



No one is scared of Romney. Really. He'll probably win the NH primary
because he has name recognition there, and then that will be the end of
him. His "nuanced" flip-flop on abortion is a tad too sophisticated for
the majority of simpleton southern Republican jesus freaks, most of whom
also relegate Mormonism to the same category as witchcraft. I lived
among the "stuporcons" of the south for more than five years, and was
always amazed at their religious simplemindedness. These are the same
folk who believe Roman Catholics aren't christian, and Jews are the
spawn of the devil who killed Jesus.

Personally, I'd love to run a campaign against Romney, the guy who
represents the same corporate interests who have sold this country down
the drain.

"HK" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...

All major corporations want these days is the cheapest possible
workforce, and if that means exporting jobs to China or India, so be
it. The righties think this is "good" for our economy, but it will do
us in sooner rather than later.

The only hope is to elect a president and congress in 2008 who will do
something to stem the flow of jobs. Those are more likely to be
democrats than republicans.
Baloney. Duncan Hunter is about as protectionist as you can get.

My personal pick is Mitt Romney.




Duncan Hunter has about as much chance as either of us to be nominated.
Your nominee will be Guiliani, Romney, or Tired Old Fred.

Hunter will be the VP candidate, and if he isn't he should.


Is Mitt for the war in Iraq, or against it? Or was he for it and is he
now against it? Mr. Flip-Flop..,he'll be fun to Swiftboat.

You guys might shoot your load too early trying to swiftboat Mitt. The
only position that he has "flip-flopped" on is abortion...and pointing
out that that he now takes a pro-life stance after taking a pro-choice
stance in order to win the governorship in MA only solidifies his
standing in the Republican primary.

You should save the flip-flop accusations for *if and when* he becomes
the nominee. It might sell well during a general election with
independents who are pro-choice. But it's not going to sell well with
Republicans who are glad he has "finally seen the light".

Democrats are scared of Romney. He has managed to steal the health care
issue with Romneycare. He is smart, articulate, accomplished, and good
looking. The man has also led a life that is beyond reproach. They'll
be no dirty tricks or last-minute skeletons for an October surprise.

I guess that's why the Dems are sending their attack dogs at the Boston
Globe against him.

No one is scared of Romney. Really. He'll probably win the NH primary
because he has name recognition there, and then that will be the end of
him. His "nuanced" flip-flop on abortion is a tad too sophisticated for
the majority of simpleton southern Republican jesus freaks, most of whom
also relegate Mormonism to the same category as witchcraft. I lived among
the "stuporcons" of the south for more than five years, and was always
amazed at their religious simplemindedness. These are the same folk who
believe Roman Catholics aren't christian, and Jews are the spawn of the
devil who killed Jesus.

Personally, I'd love to run a campaign against Romney, the guy who
represents the same corporate interests who have sold this country down
the drain.




Romney represents corporate interests? Why, because he's a businessman with
an MBA from Harvard?

I'd rather have a guy who made his money in business than one that made it
manipulating the law through our "injustice" system.

NOYB wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...

All major corporations want these days is the cheapest possible
workforce, and if that means exporting jobs to China or India, so be
it. The righties think this is "good" for our economy, but it will do
us in sooner rather than later.

The only hope is to elect a president and congress in 2008 who will do
something to stem the flow of jobs. Those are more likely to be
democrats than republicans.
Baloney. Duncan Hunter is about as protectionist as you can get.

My personal pick is Mitt Romney.



Duncan Hunter has about as much chance as either of us to be nominated.
Your nominee will be Guiliani, Romney, or Tired Old Fred.
Hunter will be the VP candidate, and if he isn't he should.


Is Mitt for the war in Iraq, or against it? Or was he for it and is he
now against it? Mr. Flip-Flop..,he'll be fun to Swiftboat.
You guys might shoot your load too early trying to swiftboat Mitt. The
only position that he has "flip-flopped" on is abortion...and pointing
out that that he now takes a pro-life stance after taking a pro-choice
stance in order to win the governorship in MA only solidifies his
standing in the Republican primary.

You should save the flip-flop accusations for *if and when* he becomes
the nominee. It might sell well during a general election with
independents who are pro-choice. But it's not going to sell well with
Republicans who are glad he has "finally seen the light".

Democrats are scared of Romney. He has managed to steal the health care
issue with Romneycare. He is smart, articulate, accomplished, and good
looking. The man has also led a life that is beyond reproach. They'll
be no dirty tricks or last-minute skeletons for an October surprise.

I guess that's why the Dems are sending their attack dogs at the Boston
Globe against him.
No one is scared of Romney. Really. He'll probably win the NH primary
because he has name recognition there, and then that will be the end of
him. His "nuanced" flip-flop on abortion is a tad too sophisticated for
the majority of simpleton southern Republican jesus freaks, most of whom
also relegate Mormonism to the same category as witchcraft. I lived among
the "stuporcons" of the south for more than five years, and was always
amazed at their religious simplemindedness. These are the same folk who
believe Roman Catholics aren't christian, and Jews are the spawn of the
devil who killed Jesus.

Personally, I'd love to run a campaign against Romney, the guy who
represents the same corporate interests who have sold this country down
the drain.




Romney represents corporate interests? Why, because he's a businessman with
an MBA from Harvard?

I'd rather have a guy who made his money in business than one that made it
manipulating the law through our "injustice" system.





The current president has an MBA from Harvard, thus proving the utter
worthlessness of the degree.

"HK" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...

All major corporations want these days is the cheapest possible
workforce, and if that means exporting jobs to China or India, so be
it. The righties think this is "good" for our economy, but it will
do us in sooner rather than later.

The only hope is to elect a president and congress in 2008 who will
do something to stem the flow of jobs. Those are more likely to be
democrats than republicans.
Baloney. Duncan Hunter is about as protectionist as you can get.

My personal pick is Mitt Romney.



Duncan Hunter has about as much chance as either of us to be
nominated. Your nominee will be Guiliani, Romney, or Tired Old Fred.
Hunter will be the VP candidate, and if he isn't he should.


Is Mitt for the war in Iraq, or against it? Or was he for it and is he
now against it? Mr. Flip-Flop..,he'll be fun to Swiftboat.
You guys might shoot your load too early trying to swiftboat Mitt. The
only position that he has "flip-flopped" on is abortion...and pointing
out that that he now takes a pro-life stance after taking a pro-choice
stance in order to win the governorship in MA only solidifies his
standing in the Republican primary.

You should save the flip-flop accusations for *if and when* he becomes
the nominee. It might sell well during a general election with
independents who are pro-choice. But it's not going to sell well with
Republicans who are glad he has "finally seen the light".

Democrats are scared of Romney. He has managed to steal the health
care issue with Romneycare. He is smart, articulate, accomplished, and
good looking. The man has also led a life that is beyond reproach.
They'll be no dirty tricks or last-minute skeletons for an October
surprise.

I guess that's why the Dems are sending their attack dogs at the Boston
Globe against him.
No one is scared of Romney. Really. He'll probably win the NH primary
because he has name recognition there, and then that will be the end of
him. His "nuanced" flip-flop on abortion is a tad too sophisticated for
the majority of simpleton southern Republican jesus freaks, most of whom
also relegate Mormonism to the same category as witchcraft. I lived
among the "stuporcons" of the south for more than five years, and was
always amazed at their religious simplemindedness. These are the same
folk who believe Roman Catholics aren't christian, and Jews are the
spawn of the devil who killed Jesus.

Personally, I'd love to run a campaign against Romney, the guy who
represents the same corporate interests who have sold this country down
the drain.




Romney represents corporate interests? Why, because he's a businessman
with an MBA from Harvard?

I'd rather have a guy who made his money in business than one that made
it manipulating the law through our "injustice" system.





The current president has an MBA from Harvard, thus proving the utter
worthlessness of the degree.

Bush's economy has given us a record stock market, record unemployment
numbers, a shrinking deficit, and unprecedented sustained growth for the
past 4 1/2 years. I'd say his MBA is serving him just fine.

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"HK" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:




Romney represents corporate interests? Why, because he's a businessman
with an MBA from Harvard?

I'd rather have a guy who made his money in business than one that made
it manipulating the law through our "injustice" system.





The current president has an MBA from Harvard, thus proving the utter
worthlessness of the degree.

Bush's economy has given us a record stock market, record unemployment
numbers, a shrinking deficit, and unprecedented sustained growth for the
past 4 1/2 years. I'd say his MBA is serving him just fine.




Don't forget lower taxes........the reason all those great things are
happening. ;-)

"JimH" ask wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"HK" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:




Romney represents corporate interests? Why, because he's a businessman
with an MBA from Harvard?

I'd rather have a guy who made his money in business than one that made
it manipulating the law through our "injustice" system.





The current president has an MBA from Harvard, thus proving the utter
worthlessness of the degree.

Bush's economy has given us a record stock market, record unemployment
numbers, a shrinking deficit, and unprecedented sustained growth for the
past 4 1/2 years. I'd say his MBA is serving him just fine.




Don't forget lower taxes........the reason all those great things are
happening. ;-)


That was the preciptating factor for the other things that I mentioned.

HK wrote:
Personally, I'd love to run a campaign against Romney, the guy who
represents the same corporate interests who have sold this country down
the drain.

No one's stopping you, Harry. You have my permission to proceed.

Tim wrote:
HK wrote:
Personally, I'd love to run a campaign against Romney, the guy who
represents the same corporate interests who have sold this country down
the drain.

No one's stopping you, Harry. You have my permission to proceed.



There's no point going after Romney unless he is nominated. I'm actually
hoping the GOP nominee is Lazy Fred. An opportunity to knock a "real
conservative" flip flopper on his butt AND capture more seats in
Congress for the Dems is something I would not want to miss.

HK wrote:
Tim wrote:
HK wrote:
Personally, I'd love to run a campaign against Romney, the guy who
represents the same corporate interests who have sold this country down
the drain.

No one's stopping you, Harry. You have my permission to proceed.



There's no point going after Romney unless he is nominated. I'm actually
hoping the GOP nominee is Lazy Fred. An opportunity to knock a "real
conservative" flip flopper on his butt AND capture more seats in
Congress for the Dems is something I would not want to miss.
Harry,
Unfortunately for you, the fantasy of you running a political campaign
is another one of your Walter Mitty dreams.