Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 19:11:33 -0700, Chuck Gould
wrote: Are you really this determined to steer the NG back into the toilet? Don't you understand Chuck? We're all being held hostage by Jon - he's the Al-Qaida of rec.boats. It's all about him and his outrage. He's gone right off the deep end. Did you know that Jon told me one time that all Republicans should be shot? True - I still have the email. I tend to keep emails that amuse me. Sadly, this one might turn into evidence at some point. And to think - he lives out by you!!! Watch your back dude - watch your back. |
#12
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 23:28:56 -0700, jps wrote:
In article . com, says... As far as I know, jps is currently boatless. My whaler is in the garage. jps Is it on a trailer? I guess it's not a 30'er then, is it. Which one is it? -- John H |
#13
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#14
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#15
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 11, 11:28?pm, jps wrote:
In article . com, says... As far as I know, jps is currently boatless. My whaler is in the garage. jps sounds a little dinghy to me. :-) Now that you have spent two days arguing politics with waitafrickin, et al,,,,, what changed as a result? (aside from general opinions of the participants?) Why not post your political nonsense somewhere else? If you feel like you need to have a right winger for breakfast in order to start your day, there are plenty of sites dedicated that that sort of thing and where you'll also find rightwingers gathered to dine on a leftie. You could have a grand old political ****ing match almost non-stop. Shortwave's thread wasn't boating related, but it didn't deserve to be hijacked and he didn't deserve to have you challenging his politics. The Iraq war is far from over. The general plan is to keep the US engaged there and elsewhere until we spend ourselves into collapse, much like Reagan accomplished with his policies that brought down the Soviet Union. It's way to soon to start crowing that one side was right and one side was wrong, or to demand that people "admit" a mistake. We don't know yet whether anybody was mistaken, or if so who that actually was. Crowing about being correct from the start at this point in time seems a lot like all of the "purple finger" celebrating that some folks engaged in when the Iraqi's appeared to have elected a government. It's way too soon, ill advised, and even if it proves in the end that the anit-war factions were "more correct" than the pro- war factions nobody will be well served being forced to eat a shame salad. Success is the art of being right at least 51% of the time. It's good practice to respect the sincere beliefs of people who disagree with you, IMO.....there's certainly no point in trying to change them. |
#16
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 12, 10:49 am, jps wrote:
In article , says... On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 19:11:33 -0700, Chuck Gould wrote: Are you really this determined to steer the NG back into the toilet? Don't you understand Chuck? We're all being held hostage by Jon - he's the Al-Qaida of rec.boats. It's all about him and his outrage. He's gone right off the deep end. Did you know that Jon told me one time that all Republicans should be shot? True - I still have the email. I tend to keep emails that amuse me. Sadly, this one might turn into evidence at some point. And to think - he lives out by you!!! Watch your back dude - watch your back. Only some Republicans should be shot. Taking our conversations out of context is rude, but I'm coming to accept that being within your ethics. Chuck is perfectly safe. Although he doesn't approve of my rabble rousing, he's not a blind fool and I agree with most of what he says. It's the mock "conservatives" who're nothing more than partisan fools who I have the beef with. So many of these fools tried to call us pinkos, commies, socialists, etc. for our views on the war and pointing out the lies we were being told. Yet, you are getting fed lies and repeating them here? Whats worse is when proven to be lies, you dismiss it and get more foul mouthed. Now, after all is nearly said and done, it turns out we silly libs were right. I want my piece of flesh for being accused of treason, being a traitor to my country for dissent -- by many of the self righteous assholes who still frequent this group. Nothing is said and done. Even if it would fit your agenda. So much resource squandered, our moral authority in the world a shambles, our kids, young parents dead, maimed, psychologically damaged, with many tens of thousands of Iraqis dead or maimed. Families destroyed in the name of lies and hubris. But there is no proof of "lies and hubris", no convictions, only anecdotal web blogs encouraged and paid for by groups like the Soros organization, DNC, One World, ACLU, NAMBLA, and various other fringe activist groups. But like your lies about O, no real proof, just daydreams and made up stories... The assholes claiming we were misguided fools know who they are. I just want a little time to rub their faces in the **** they were spewing back when they beat their small-minded drums at a fever pitch. Still, nothing but ideological furver, mixed with juvenile classless language. No substance, no shame... jps- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
#17
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#18
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 12, 8:50?am, wrote:
But there is no proof of "lies and hubris", no convictions, only anecdotal web blogs encouraged and paid for by groups like the Soros organization, DNC, One World, ACLU, NAMBLA, and various other fringe activist groups. But like your lies about O, no real proof, just daydreams and made up stories... I think we agree on something, justafreakin. It can be disastrous to accept unproven spin as a basis for opinion, and even more disastrous to use it as a basis for defining policy. We probably shouldn't listen to anybody with a partisan agenda or financial interest in one version of the truth vs. another. Any suggestions concerning where we should turn for completely unbiased reporting devoid of partisan influence and editorializing? I'd be at a loss to identify a single one, on any side of the spectrum or in any medium. Looks to me like you and jps have each chosen a different subset from the universe of biased sources. Darned if I know which is less biased, or even which bias is more or less destructive than the other. I know which bias serves my personal agenda more specifically, but it would sure screw up the NG for me to interrupt threads and try to divert the discussion to politics. |
#19
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#20
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chuck Gould wrote:
On Jul 12, 8:50?am, wrote: But there is no proof of "lies and hubris", no convictions, only anecdotal web blogs encouraged and paid for by groups like the Soros organization, DNC, One World, ACLU, NAMBLA, and various other fringe activist groups. But like your lies about O, no real proof, just daydreams and made up stories... ^ Now there's a fella whose brain has been washed by reich-wing media. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Went to the library for a boating book. | General | |||
Boating Group | General | |||
ON-TOPIC! Boating and politics! | General | |||
Lets start a new NG for just boating, not politics | General |