![]() |
trawler or cruiser
On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 20:46:10 -0700, Chuck Gould
wrote: I've been a slow boater for the longest time. What's the hurry? that's a good point, too..after all, folks still go sailing! If you like spray, noise, vibration, and general ruckus underway you will want to get a boat that goes as fast as possible. :-) yeah i'm past the point where 40 kts is exciting...just a nice slow cruise is a good way to spend the day... |
trawler or cruiser
On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 20:46:10 -0700, Chuck Gould
wrote: If you're in all that much of a darn hurry get in your car and drive. :-) I'll try that next time I want to head out to the Canyons for swordfishing. :) |
trawler or cruiser
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message oups.com... On Jul 6, 5:14?pm, wrote: giving some thought to either a trawler or cruiser for galveston bay/gulf of mexico. purpose would be just to tool around while not paying huge bux for gas. Part of the consideration, and probably an important part, has to do with where you boat. In my neck of the country, I can draw a "two hour circle" (16 nm diameter) anywhere on the chart and include a dozen interesting places to visit, take photos, just kick back and sight see, or fish if so inclined. Contrast that with a lot of boaters in So California who spend every boating weekend running out to Catalina Island, and hope to get there early enough to claim a prime moorage spot.....they have a good reason, I guess, to go lickety split. If you like spray, noise, vibration, and general ruckus underway you will want to get a boat that goes as fast as possible. :-) I would add that the selection of a boat type really depends on what your interests are, what stage of life you are at and what, at the end of the day, leaves you with a generally good feeling of having enjoyed the day's experiences. I've had 12 different boats in the last 15 years ... often having more than one at a time. They have included 55 mph go-fast small center consoles, gas powered express cruisers, a high performance diesel powered sports-fish, a fairly large diesel powered cruiser and a "trawler". Some were brand new, some were old and needed constant work. Although we enjoyed them all, I've lost the lust for speed and bouncing from wave top to wave top. I also have tired of the fishing thing as a serious activity. I enjoy and respect nautical tradition, general seamanship and the skills/knowledge required to apply it and therefore have found myself increasingly enjoying the "trawler". Right now, if I decide to take another winter voyage south (which is under serious consideration) it would be a tough decision between the ultra comfortable Navigator or the more nautical and traditional (and much slower) Grand Banks. We took a little cruise yesterday, giving Mrs .E. some boating handling and navigation lessons. It was totally enjoyable and relaxing. It's interesting because although the Navigator is not a "fast" boat by any means, it is more suited for cruising at 19 kts, 20-25 miles offshore, away from coastal boating activity. Problem is, other than birds, airplanes and an occasional passing boat off in the distance, there is nothing to see except water. Running the ICW in it can be downright stressful at times with constant attention required to the depth gauge and the channel markers with one hand constantly resting on the throttles ready to pull back at a moment's notice. The GB, on the other hand, would seem to me to be ideal for a slow-paced and relaxing cruise south on the ICW, stopping here and there to explore interesting sites and going "out" only in the critical areas. Plus, I could just about make it to St. Augustine, FL on one fill-up! (green, you know) Anyway, those are my current thoughts. Eisboch |
trawler or cruiser
On Sat, 7 Jul 2007 08:24:31 -0400, "RCE" wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wro The GB, on the other hand, would seem to me to be ideal for a slow-paced and relaxing cruise south on the ICW, stopping here and there to explore interesting sites and going "out" only in the critical areas. Plus, I could just about make it to St. Augustine, FL on one fill-up! (green, you know) Anyway, those are my current thoughts. Eisboch the GB is a beautiful boat...and the economics aint bad either! |
trawler or cruiser
On Sat, 7 Jul 2007 08:24:31 -0400, "RCE" wrote:
Anyway, those are my current thoughts. I don't know - maybe I just haven't found the right boat for "cruising". Of all the boats I've been on and seen over the past year or so, the Grand Banks interests me a lot. I just can't get past that whole 7 knot thing. Plus, I'm a fiddler - I like to play with the trim buttons, tinker with the controls, adjust this and that. Plus, going quickly (rather than flat out) keeps you on your toes and interested in what's going on. Putting my feet up and watching the shore line slide past isn't a concept that I readily accept. |
trawler or cruiser
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sat, 7 Jul 2007 08:24:31 -0400, "RCE" wrote: Anyway, those are my current thoughts. I don't know - maybe I just haven't found the right boat for "cruising". Of all the boats I've been on and seen over the past year or so, the Grand Banks interests me a lot. I just can't get past that whole 7 knot thing. Plus, I'm a fiddler - I like to play with the trim buttons, tinker with the controls, adjust this and that. Plus, going quickly (rather than flat out) keeps you on your toes and interested in what's going on. Putting my feet up and watching the shore line slide past isn't a concept that I readily accept. One of the local wags describes it as "Comaboating." |
trawler or cruiser
Chuck Gould wrote:
On Jul 6, 5:14?pm, wrote: As far as "can't run the inlet", etc, comments further down the thread...pooh, pooh. One of the oldest maritime traditions is working *with* the winds and currents to get around. For a motorless sailboat or rowboat, absolutely. Glad to see you have a rationalization for every occasion! |
trawler or cruiser
HK wrote: One of the local wags describes it as "Comaboating." That's a good one, Harry. Never looked at it that way. |
trawler or cruiser
On Jul 7, 7:41?am, HK wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote: On Jul 6, 5:14?pm, wrote: As far as "can't run the inlet", etc, comments further down the thread...pooh, pooh. One of the oldest maritime traditions is working *with* the winds and currents to get around. For a motorless sailboat or rowboat, absolutely. Glad to see you have a rationalization for every occasion! My favorite local example of horsepower being substituted for brains and seamanship is a little waterway known as Deception Pass. (Due to the high volume of current, the orginal Spanish explorers charted the pass as a "river mouth". When Vancouver used the Spaish charts as a basis for his exploration of the NE Pacific he realized the flow was tidal current through a pass, not a river mouth, and so he named the pass "Deception" to acknowledge that it had fooled the Spanish). Anyway, Deception Pass is between the north end of Whidbey Island and the south end of Fidalgo Island. 8 knot currents are common during maximum ebb or flood. Large groups of boats, including all varieties of power boats and of course all sailboats gather at either end of the pass to wait for slack water to transit through. Those waiting for slack will include boaters with 1400 HP boats capable of doing 20-30 kt or more. An 8 knot current certainly wouldn't impede a 20-knot boat, but there are some *extremely* good reasons why the sea savvy either wait for slack or skillfully time their arrival at the pass during slack water. The pass is narrow, (hence the velocity of flow), and peppered with rocks along each edge. When the pass is running, random whirlpools form without much warning and can collapse just as quickly. A boat with any draft at all can easily be diverted from what needs to be a reasonably precise course. Our local waters are notorious for drift and deadheads, so deadfall and logging debris are swept through the pass at nearly every flood or ebb. It gets very interesting when a 20- foot length of phone pole diameter drift wood gets sucked under by a whirlpool, carried along the stream until the vortex collapses, and then comes shooting back up through the surface like some wooden missle launched from a submarine- it renews a person's respect for the awesome power of the sea. Nobody builds a pleasure boat that would be immune to damage from a vertically launched battering ram. Drift that isn't sucked under to come shooting back through the surface 50 or 100 yards downstream can run at any position through the pass, including "sideways", and that could leave very little room for a vessel to dodge aroudn the end of the log and the edge of the rocks. A tiny percentage of people will run the pass at any current state. They often boast about their stupidity. I once heard one remark, "I've got enough power to run 20 knots, so I can still make 8-10 knots through the pass!" I wonder who he thinks is "steering" that oncoming 40-foot phone pole spinning through the whirlpools at 8 knots? |
trawler or cruiser
On Jul 7, 3:30?am, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 20:46:10 -0700, Chuck Gould wrote: If you're in all that much of a darn hurry get in your car and drive. :-) I'll try that next time I want to head out to the Canyons for swordfishing. :) So how did people get out to the Canyons or go swordfishing before 20-30 kt offshore fishing boats were available? |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:10 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com