On Sat, 9 Jun 2007 07:31:36 -0500, "Steve Barker"
wrote:

The reason for the step-down recommendation is because the aluminum flexes
and looses some pitch. Stainless does not.


flexes - I think that's generally accepted; but flexes to the point of loosing
2" of pitch? I find that hard to believe.

On this theory; I'm giong to be way under propped as I had a SS 19 and I went to
an aluminum 17; so on your theory; this will be like a 15 pitch SS....

It's not MY theory, and it's not theory. thanks for the input. I remember
now why I left this group 3 years ago.

--
Steve Barker

for the spam bots:






"Josh Assing" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 9 Jun 2007 07:31:36 -0500, "Steve Barker"

wrote:

The reason for the step-down recommendation is because the aluminum flexes
and looses some pitch. Stainless does not.


flexes - I think that's generally accepted; but flexes to the point of
loosing
2" of pitch? I find that hard to believe.

On this theory; I'm giong to be way under propped as I had a SS 19 and I
went to
an aluminum 17; so on your theory; this will be like a 15 pitch SS....

Steve Barker wrote:
It's not MY theory, and it's not theory. thanks for the input. I remember
now why I left this group 3 years ago.


Steve, it's not even not theory.

You're disseminating false information, that's all.

Rob

oh really? well take it or leave it then. why would a person put out false
information if they didn't work for the government?


--
Steve Barker

for the spam bots:






"trainfan1" wrote in message
...
Steve Barker wrote:
It's not MY theory, and it's not theory. thanks for the input. I
remember now why I left this group 3 years ago.


Steve, it's not even not theory.

You're disseminating false information, that's all.

Rob

On Sat, 9 Jun 2007 20:25:03 -0500, "Steve Barker"
wrote:

It's not MY theory, and it's not theory. thanks for the input. I remember
now why I left this group 3 years ago.

Dang you take things way too personally -- you're the one that brought up that
if flexes that much.

sorry to have gotten your panties in a bunch

Why? Because you get your panties in a bunch when dissagreed with? It's
theory, and I have enough practical pratice (in the real water, not fixing
propellers) to dissagree.

All things being equel, you can drop a pitch when going from aluminum to SS,
because the SS blades are thinner and cut water better.

Perhaps aluminum flex works against fact that in some theoretical
high-horsepower environment - but not in day to day operation with normal
horsepower ranges.
-W

--
CC Marine

Lake Hartwell SC
"Where the fish are always biting, and the swimmers are always nervous!"


"Steve Barker" wrote in message
...
It's not MY theory, and it's not theory. thanks for the input. I
remember
now why I left this group 3 years ago.

--
Steve Barker

for the spam bots:






"Josh Assing" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 9 Jun 2007 07:31:36 -0500, "Steve Barker"

wrote:

The reason for the step-down recommendation is because the aluminum
flexes
and looses some pitch. Stainless does not.


flexes - I think that's generally accepted; but flexes to the point of
loosing
2" of pitch? I find that hard to believe.

On this theory; I'm giong to be way under propped as I had a SS 19 and I
went to
an aluminum 17; so on your theory; this will be like a 15 pitch SS....

Errrrr, I meant go UP a pitch. - not drop a pitch. sigh

--
CC Marine

Lake Hartwell SC
"Where the fish are always biting, and the swimmers are always nervous!"


"Clams Canino" wrote in message
news
All things being equel, you can drop a pitch when going from aluminum to
SS,
because the SS blades are thinner and cut water better.