On Jun 8, 8:11?am, Gene Kearns
wrote:
On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 10:57:00 -0500, John H.
wrote:

Chuck's dot was an attempt to keep trash posts out of the group. What's the
reason for your crap?

Let me suggest this to anybody wishing to stop trash posts:

1) If you must respond, it is counterproductive to repost the trash
post. If you don't want to see it, why copy it (again and again)?

1) If you must respond, it is extremely counterproductive to repost
the trash poster's links. If you don't want to see it, why copy it
(again and again)?
--

Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC.

eMail


Homepagehttp://pamandgene.idleplay.net/

Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguidehttp://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats
-----------------www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com- *Completion*Retention*Speed*
Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road
-----------------

Back when I was deleting the text of messages like this, a large
number of people all bitched about "censorship".

Munging the title leaves the hateful crap there for everybody to read.

That normally reduces bitching down to the Jim, Charlie Morgan, and
Don White (see below) contingency. Two of those three would complain
if I posted that Monday followed Sunday, and the third hasn't had a
positive thing to say to anybody in months.

There isn't a good way to do this that will make everybody happy.
In fact, it isn't about making anybody happy- it's about picking up
trash.

"Chuck Gould" wrote in message

There isn't a good way to do this that will make everybody happy.
In fact, it isn't about making anybody happy- it's about picking up
trash.

Now we're getting to the real issue (Chuckie dot) You are not smart enough
or honest enough to be the keeper of the trash (Chuckie dot)
By the way, do you prefer Chuckie or Chucky? My spell checker likes Chucky.

"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
ups.com...

Back when I was deleting the text of messages like this, a large
number of people all bitched about "censorship".

Munging the title leaves the hateful crap there for everybody to read.

That normally reduces bitching down to the Jim, Charlie Morgan, and
Don White (see below) contingency. Two of those three would complain
if I posted that Monday followed Sunday, and the third hasn't had a
positive thing to say to anybody in months.

There isn't a good way to do this that will make everybody happy.
In fact, it isn't about making anybody happy- it's about picking up
trash.


Yes..and you should really start in your own backyard Chuck.

On Jun 8, 11:32?am, "Don White" wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message

ups.com...



Back when I was deleting the text of messages like this, a large
number of people all bitched about "censorship".

Munging the title leaves the hateful crap there for everybody to read.

That normally reduces bitching down to the Jim, Charlie Morgan, and
Don White (see below) contingency. Two of those three would complain
if I posted that Monday followed Sunday, and the third hasn't had a
positive thing to say to anybody in months.

There isn't a good way to do this that will make everybody happy.
In fact, it isn't about making anybody happy- it's about picking up
trash.

Yes..and you should really start in your own backyard Chuck.

I agree. Please come down on me like a load of bricks when I post
about "rapist negroes", etc. OK?

Chuck Gould wrote:
On Jun 8, 11:32?am, "Don White" wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message

ups.com...



Back when I was deleting the text of messages like this, a large
number of people all bitched about "censorship".
Munging the title leaves the hateful crap there for everybody to read.
That normally reduces bitching down to the Jim, Charlie Morgan, and
Don White (see below) contingency. Two of those three would complain
if I posted that Monday followed Sunday, and the third hasn't had a
positive thing to say to anybody in months.
There isn't a good way to do this that will make everybody happy.
In fact, it isn't about making anybody happy- it's about picking up
trash.
Yes..and you should really start in your own backyard Chuck.

I agree. Please come down on me like a load of bricks when I post
about "rapist negroes", etc. OK?



The preferred plural of brick is...brick.

On Jun 8, 1:31?pm, HK wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:
On Jun 8, 11:32?am, "Don White" wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message

roups.com...

Back when I was deleting the text of messages like this, a large
number of people all bitched about "censorship".
Munging the title leaves the hateful crap there for everybody to read.
That normally reduces bitching down to the Jim, Charlie Morgan, and
Don White (see below) contingency. Two of those three would complain
if I posted that Monday followed Sunday, and the third hasn't had a
positive thing to say to anybody in months.
There isn't a good way to do this that will make everybody happy.
In fact, it isn't about making anybody happy- it's about picking up
trash.
Yes..and you should really start in your own backyard Chuck.

I agree. Please come down on me like a load of bricks when I post
about "rapist negroes", etc. OK?

The preferred plural of brick is...brick.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

With your experience in the masonry trade, you would know. Thanks for
the tip.

"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
oups.com...

I agree. Please come down on me like a load of bricks when I post
about "rapist negroes", etc. OK?


Who was talking about 'that subject' in this thread?
Maybe my newsreader filters all that 'US garbage' at the border. ;-)