Gene Kearns wrote:
On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 11:40:05 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 11:11:14 -0400, Gene Kearns
wrote:

On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 10:57:00 -0500, John H.
wrote:

Chuck's dot was an attempt to keep trash posts out of the group. What's the
reason for your crap?
Let me suggest this to anybody wishing to stop trash posts:

1) If you must respond, it is counterproductive to repost the trash
post. If you don't want to see it, why copy it (again and again)?

1) If you must respond, it is extremely counterproductive to repost
the trash poster's links. If you don't want to see it, why copy it
(again and again)?
Why thanks, Gene. Any help is appreciated.

Maybe I should have added that the preferred method is to just add the
poster to your kill file and ignore them.

Then there is no angst over censorship, dots, or countless repetition
of what you didn't want to see, anyway.

Ahh, yes. Herring in the kill file. Yup. That's the ticket.

HK wrote:
Gene Kearns wrote:
On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 11:40:05 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 11:11:14 -0400, Gene Kearns
wrote:

On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 10:57:00 -0500, John H.
wrote:

Chuck's dot was an attempt to keep trash posts out of the group.
What's the
reason for your crap?
Let me suggest this to anybody wishing to stop trash posts:

1) If you must respond, it is counterproductive to repost the trash
post. If you don't want to see it, why copy it (again and again)?

1) If you must respond, it is extremely counterproductive to repost
the trash poster's links. If you don't want to see it, why copy it
(again and again)?
Why thanks, Gene. Any help is appreciated.

Maybe I should have added that the preferred method is to just add the
poster to your kill file and ignore them.

Then there is no angst over censorship, dots, or countless repetition
of what you didn't want to see, anyway.

Ahh, yes. Herring in the kill file. Yup. That's the ticket.
Harry,
If it wasn't for your comments about who you have in your kill filter,
you wouldn't have any thing to say.

"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Jun 8, 8:27?am, "Don White" wrote:


Thank you Gene. It's time someone explained how to 'keep the peace' to
the
local sheriff.

Oh, I'm sooooooo sorry Don.
I'll try to post some "The US Sucks!" posts- I'm kidding, but I'm sure
you would find that more to your taste and more consistent with your
typical contribution here.



Now why would you say that Chuck?
You're getting as paranoid as some of the other agitators here.

"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
ups.com...

Back when I was deleting the text of messages like this, a large
number of people all bitched about "censorship".

Munging the title leaves the hateful crap there for everybody to read.

That normally reduces bitching down to the Jim, Charlie Morgan, and
Don White (see below) contingency. Two of those three would complain
if I posted that Monday followed Sunday, and the third hasn't had a
positive thing to say to anybody in months.

There isn't a good way to do this that will make everybody happy.
In fact, it isn't about making anybody happy- it's about picking up
trash.


Yes..and you should really start in your own backyard Chuck.

"John H." wrote in message
news
On Fri, 8 Jun 2007 15:30:11 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
roups.com...
On Jun 8, 8:27?am, "Don White" wrote:


Thank you Gene. It's time someone explained how to 'keep the peace'
to
the
local sheriff.

Oh, I'm sooooooo sorry Don.
I'll try to post some "The US Sucks!" posts- I'm kidding, but I'm sure
you would find that more to your taste and more consistent with your
typical contribution here.



Now why would you say that Chuck?
You're getting as paranoid as some of the other agitators here.


Let's see, from Washington, I guess the back yard would be...Canada?

Huh??

On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 12:43:57 -0400, Gene Kearns
wrote:

On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 11:40:05 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 11:11:14 -0400, Gene Kearns
wrote:

On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 10:57:00 -0500, John H.
wrote:

Chuck's dot was an attempt to keep trash posts out of the group. What's the
reason for your crap?

Let me suggest this to anybody wishing to stop trash posts:

1) If you must respond, it is counterproductive to repost the trash
post. If you don't want to see it, why copy it (again and again)?

1) If you must respond, it is extremely counterproductive to repost
the trash poster's links. If you don't want to see it, why copy it
(again and again)?

Why thanks, Gene. Any help is appreciated.

Maybe I should have added that the preferred method is to just add the
poster to your kill file and ignore them.

Then there is no angst over censorship, dots, or countless repetition
of what you didn't want to see, anyway.

Well, I don't know all the KKK types out there, but generally that's a good
idea.

On Fri, 8 Jun 2007 15:30:11 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Jun 8, 8:27?am, "Don White" wrote:


Thank you Gene. It's time someone explained how to 'keep the peace' to
the
local sheriff.

Oh, I'm sooooooo sorry Don.
I'll try to post some "The US Sucks!" posts- I'm kidding, but I'm sure
you would find that more to your taste and more consistent with your
typical contribution here.



Now why would you say that Chuck?
You're getting as paranoid as some of the other agitators here.


Let's see, from Washington, I guess the back yard would be...Canada?

On Jun 8, 11:32?am, "Don White" wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message

ups.com...



Back when I was deleting the text of messages like this, a large
number of people all bitched about "censorship".

Munging the title leaves the hateful crap there for everybody to read.

That normally reduces bitching down to the Jim, Charlie Morgan, and
Don White (see below) contingency. Two of those three would complain
if I posted that Monday followed Sunday, and the third hasn't had a
positive thing to say to anybody in months.

There isn't a good way to do this that will make everybody happy.
In fact, it isn't about making anybody happy- it's about picking up
trash.

Yes..and you should really start in your own backyard Chuck.

I agree. Please come down on me like a load of bricks when I post
about "rapist negroes", etc. OK?

Chuck Gould wrote:
On Jun 8, 11:32?am, "Don White" wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message

ups.com...



Back when I was deleting the text of messages like this, a large
number of people all bitched about "censorship".
Munging the title leaves the hateful crap there for everybody to read.
That normally reduces bitching down to the Jim, Charlie Morgan, and
Don White (see below) contingency. Two of those three would complain
if I posted that Monday followed Sunday, and the third hasn't had a
positive thing to say to anybody in months.
There isn't a good way to do this that will make everybody happy.
In fact, it isn't about making anybody happy- it's about picking up
trash.
Yes..and you should really start in your own backyard Chuck.

I agree. Please come down on me like a load of bricks when I post
about "rapist negroes", etc. OK?



The preferred plural of brick is...brick.

"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
oups.com...

I agree. Please come down on me like a load of bricks when I post
about "rapist negroes", etc. OK?


Who was talking about 'that subject' in this thread?
Maybe my newsreader filters all that 'US garbage' at the border. ;-)