http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:H.R.2550:


Every boater would be well advised to contact his or her US
Congressperson and express an opinion on this bill. (It is assumed
that most boaters would support itl)

On Jun 1, 11:09?am, "Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute"
wrote:
In ooglegroups.com,
Chuck Gould sprach forth the following:

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:H.R.2550:

Retard, didn't you just whine about someone posting something that had
already been posted?

Go back to writing reviews that slobber your rag's advertisers.

What, and miss all the high level intellectual banter with you?

I apologize for repostinng this, I didn't realize that you had posted
a link in the other thread. That's not entirely my fault. A lot of
people, self included, are reluctant to open your posts because they
are so commonly filled with the same nasty BS you responded with here.

It's natural for people to disagree. Actual adults normally manage to
do with without becoming personally disagreeable in the process.

Chuck Gould wrote:
On Jun 1, 11:09?am, "Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute"
wrote:
In ooglegroups.com,
Chuck Gould sprach forth the following:

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:H.R.2550:
Retard, didn't you just whine about someone posting something that had
already been posted?

Go back to writing reviews that slobber your rag's advertisers.

What, and miss all the high level intellectual banter with you?

I apologize for repostinng this, I didn't realize that you had posted
a link in the other thread. That's not entirely my fault. A lot of
people, self included, are reluctant to open your posts because they
are so commonly filled with the same nasty BS you responded with here.

It's natural for people to disagree. Actual adults normally manage to
do with without becoming personally disagreeable in the process.





Jesus, Chuck, why are you bothering with Foul-Mouthed Fred?

"John H." wrote in message
...
Most of us have stopped any conversation with basskisser for the reasons
you mention above. Some people just can't converse without name-calling.


Right you are...
examples... "neato" "hazeltones" etc.

On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 11:22:25 -0700, Chuck Gould
wrote:

On Jun 1, 11:09?am, "Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute"
wrote:
In ooglegroups.com,
Chuck Gould sprach forth the following:

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:H.R.2550:

Retard, didn't you just whine about someone posting something that had
already been posted?

Go back to writing reviews that slobber your rag's advertisers.

What, and miss all the high level intellectual banter with you?

I apologize for repostinng this, I didn't realize that you had posted
a link in the other thread. That's not entirely my fault. A lot of
people, self included, are reluctant to open your posts because they
are so commonly filled with the same nasty BS you responded with here.

It's natural for people to disagree. Actual adults normally manage to
do with without becoming personally disagreeable in the process.


Most of us have stopped any conversation with basskisser for the reasons
you mention above. Some people just can't converse without name-calling.

On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 17:44:05 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
.. .
Most of us have stopped any conversation with basskisser for the reasons
you mention above. Some people just can't converse without name-calling.


Right you are...
examples... "neato" "hazeltones" etc.


That's a group name! My gosh, you're all neat, and you've told us about
your hazel eyes. Surely you don't put 'Neato Hazeltones' in the same
category as 'asshole' and some of the other favorites around here.

On Jun 1, 6:01?pm, John H. wrote:
Surely you don't put 'Neato Hazeltones' in the same
category as 'asshole' and some of the other favorites around here.

And that's being mild!

On Jun 1, 2:09 pm, "Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute"
wrote:
In ooglegroups.com,
Chuck Gould sprach forth the following:

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:H.R.2550:

Retard, didn't you just whine about someone posting something that had
already been posted?

Go back to writing reviews that slobber your rag's advertisers.

You, who can't make a single point about anything without childish and
petty name calling, pathetic and silly insults, and outright third
grade like blather calls someone else a retard????

On Jun 1, 5:16 pm, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 11:22:25 -0700, Chuck Gould





wrote:
On Jun 1, 11:09?am, "Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute"
wrote:
In ooglegroups.com,
Chuck Gould sprach forth the following:

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:H.R.2550:

Retard, didn't you just whine about someone posting something that had
already been posted?

Go back to writing reviews that slobber your rag's advertisers.

What, and miss all the high level intellectual banter with you?

I apologize for repostinng this, I didn't realize that you had posted
a link in the other thread. That's not entirely my fault. A lot of
people, self included, are reluctant to open your posts because they
are so commonly filled with the same nasty BS you responded with here.

It's natural for people to disagree. Actual adults normally manage to
do with without becoming personally disagreeable in the process.

Most of us have stopped any conversation with basskisser for the reasons
you mention above. Some people just can't converse without name-calling.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Awe, how cute! You just can't forget me, can you, John?

"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Jun 1, 2:09 pm, "Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute"
wrote:
In ooglegroups.com,
Chuck Gould sprach forth the following:

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:H.R.2550:

Retard, didn't you just whine about someone posting something that had
already been posted?

Go back to writing reviews that slobber your rag's advertisers.

You, who can't make a single point about anything without childish and
petty name calling, pathetic and silly insults, and outright third
grade like blather calls someone else a retard????


Golly gosh gee you're a neat swell guy. :-)
-JohnH