wrote in message
oups.com...
On Jun 1, 10:15 pm, wrote:
On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 12:44:07 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:
This is the problem with having liberal activist judges on the bench:
http://www.boattest.com/nmma.aspx

of course, conservatives have done away with such inconveniences as
habeus corpus, and the right to a fair trial...

annoyances, you see...

A fair trial. humph... Guess it depends on how much money you have.
Now that more and more are financially fit, the financially fit are
being targeted too and you just don' t like the level playing field do
you? Your comment is little more than a cliche', Please tell me how
your constitutional rights have been infringed on by Bush. Please name
anyone who's have by Bush's policy. It's really just a talking point
like the years the libs cried about the rules allowing FBI to check
into someones library reading. Crying for years when in fact as of
last fall, the FBI had asked for exactly zero library records, none,
nada. no ones constitutional rights have been slammed. You talk as if
this is some across the country sweep. Of course the only time my
constitutional rights were stomped on by dirty establisnment was
during the Carter adminstration. Your talking points have no basis in
fact, they just make you sound silly and uninformed.


Exactly zero library records? You may want to check your facts. You
probably won't, though. You may also want to ponder why it's difficult to
check these facts. Do you know why?