On Tue, 29 May 2007 14:34:49 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"RG" wrote in message
om...

"thunder" wrote in message
news
On Mon, 28 May 2007 11:36:38 -0400, HK wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/2wxdg3

Was that picture taken in the east?

God only knows, given the source. But I can tell you the that photo in
question was taken over 3 years ago, on March 10th, 2004 at 0714. The
actual location of the shot and the name of the photographer has not been
disclosed, per usual. The ambiguity leaves the implication that the work
is of the original poster, but no such actual declaration has been made.
It's been an often repeated MO of the original poster over the years.


You watching Harry that close?? Pathetic!
Can't you find someone to con into buying an overpriced & un-needed
insurance policy?


Don, Harrie's the one who posts pictures, like his owls, pretending he took
them. Where have you been?

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Tue, 29 May 2007 14:34:49 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"RG" wrote in message
. com...

"thunder" wrote in message
news On Mon, 28 May 2007 11:36:38 -0400, HK wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/2wxdg3

Was that picture taken in the east?

God only knows, given the source. But I can tell you the that photo in
question was taken over 3 years ago, on March 10th, 2004 at 0714. The
actual location of the shot and the name of the photographer has not
been
disclosed, per usual. The ambiguity leaves the implication that the
work
is of the original poster, but no such actual declaration has been made.
It's been an often repeated MO of the original poster over the years.


You watching Harry that close?? Pathetic!
Can't you find someone to con into buying an overpriced & un-needed
insurance policy?


Don, Harrie's the one who posts pictures, like his owls, pretending he
took
them. Where have you been?


Can you prove that?

Don White wrote:
"RG" wrote in message
m...
"thunder" wrote in message
news
On Mon, 28 May 2007 11:36:38 -0400, HK wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/2wxdg3
Was that picture taken in the east?
God only knows, given the source. But I can tell you the that photo in
question was taken over 3 years ago, on March 10th, 2004 at 0714. The
actual location of the shot and the name of the photographer has not been
disclosed, per usual. The ambiguity leaves the implication that the work
is of the original poster, but no such actual declaration has been made.
It's been an often repeated MO of the original poster over the years.


You watching Harry that close?? Pathetic!
Can't you find someone to con into buying an overpriced & un-needed
insurance policy?



Watching out for Daddy? How...sad.

"HK" wrote in message
. ..
http://tinyurl.com/2wxdg3

You could feed some of the characters in here to that cat!
On second thought the SPCA would be on your case for cruelty to animals.

"HK" wrote in message
. ..
http://tinyurl.com/2wxdg3

I wonder if that kitty could be convinced to decimate the deer here, but
leave the kids alone.

"HK" wrote in message
. ..
http://tinyurl.com/2wxdg3

Holy crap!