"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 8 Jun 2007 17:17:17 -0400, "JimH" wrote:


"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
groups.com...


Charlie Morgan's post has nothing to do with my sainted mother, and
very little to do with me, but does one heck of a lot to define who he
is and how whatever it is he substitutes for a mind attempts to work.
Obviously the poor guy needs some professional help- in fact he may
well have computer privileges in some institution where they are
already attempting to do whatever might be possible for him. In my
opinion, somebody that ill deserves our concern, and when appropriate
even perhaps prayers for his speedy and full recovery. How could any
decent person be mad at a guy so obviously unable to control himself?
It would be like yelling at a six month old baby for soiling a diaper.

JimH doesn't deserve to be tarred with the same brush. He's behaving
like a gentleman, and he ought to be treated with appropriate respect.
(The heaviest thing anybody will ever carry is a grudge).

Normally, when somebody doesn't like me it simply indicates that they
are an astute judge of character. :-) Making obscene remarks about my
mother shows a really sick and twisted personality for what it
is.......and as I said earlier it's a compliment to be considered an a-
hole by his standards.



Thanks Chuck.

One using a 'handle' without revealing his/her actual identity, such as
'basskisser', is posting anonymously and would not normally say the things
if posting under his/her real name (Charlie Morgan may be an exception to
that). In actuality, there can be millions of 'basskissers' posting on
the
internet. How can you insult a fictional and anonymous character?

That is quite different than one posting with their real name/id,
especially
when someone decides to direct personal attacks and insults to that
person's
wife, mother or other family members.

The bottom line is that Charlie was way out of bounds and owes you an
apology.


Chuck_ the_ **** is doing what he does as a cry for attention. I'm merely
giving
him some attention he didn't figure on. Over time I've seen many folks try
to
reason with him, and politely ask him to stop his moronic and
counter-productive
crusade. Chuck has ignored them. He imagines he knows something that they
don't,
and so he continues. The way I see it, Chuck_the_ schmuck should be
apologizing
to me and everyone else he offends with his reposting of racist spam.

Chuck can stop his idiotic chuckie-dot crusade at any time, and then I
will no
longer have any reason to talk about his mother. Until then, I maintain
that she
does squat thrusts on fire hydrants.

CWM

Attack him all you want. Don't bring his mother or his other family members
into the mix as that is uncalled for.

You owe him an apology.

"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 8 Jun 2007 18:14:09 -0400, "JimH" wrote:


"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
. ..
On Fri, 8 Jun 2007 17:17:17 -0400, "JimH" wrote:


"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
legroups.com...


Charlie Morgan's post has nothing to do with my sainted mother, and
very little to do with me, but does one heck of a lot to define who he
is and how whatever it is he substitutes for a mind attempts to work.
Obviously the poor guy needs some professional help- in fact he may
well have computer privileges in some institution where they are
already attempting to do whatever might be possible for him. In my
opinion, somebody that ill deserves our concern, and when appropriate
even perhaps prayers for his speedy and full recovery. How could any
decent person be mad at a guy so obviously unable to control himself?
It would be like yelling at a six month old baby for soiling a diaper.

JimH doesn't deserve to be tarred with the same brush. He's behaving
like a gentleman, and he ought to be treated with appropriate respect.
(The heaviest thing anybody will ever carry is a grudge).

Normally, when somebody doesn't like me it simply indicates that they
are an astute judge of character. :-) Making obscene remarks about my
mother shows a really sick and twisted personality for what it
is.......and as I said earlier it's a compliment to be considered an
a-
hole by his standards.



Thanks Chuck.

One using a 'handle' without revealing his/her actual identity, such as
'basskisser', is posting anonymously and would not normally say the
things
if posting under his/her real name (Charlie Morgan may be an exception
to
that). In actuality, there can be millions of 'basskissers' posting on
the
internet. How can you insult a fictional and anonymous character?

That is quite different than one posting with their real name/id,
especially
when someone decides to direct personal attacks and insults to that
person's
wife, mother or other family members.

The bottom line is that Charlie was way out of bounds and owes you an
apology.


Chuck_ the_ **** is doing what he does as a cry for attention. I'm
merely
giving
him some attention he didn't figure on. Over time I've seen many folks
try
to
reason with him, and politely ask him to stop his moronic and
counter-productive
crusade. Chuck has ignored them. He imagines he knows something that
they
don't,
and so he continues. The way I see it, Chuck_the_ schmuck should be
apologizing
to me and everyone else he offends with his reposting of racist spam.

Chuck can stop his idiotic chuckie-dot crusade at any time, and then I
will no
longer have any reason to talk about his mother. Until then, I maintain
that she
does squat thrusts on fire hydrants.

CWM

Attack him all you want. Don't bring his mother or his other family
members
into the mix as that is uncalled for.

You owe him an apology.


Just like Chuck, I don't take polite, well meaning, or even reasonable,
advice.
He owes me an apology. His mother is a skanky crack whore. So is yours,
except
your mother does bestiality videos as a sideline. His mother was uglier
than the
pig, so they hired your mother, instead.

I'll provide this attention to anyone who requests it.

You're welcome.

CWM


You have now proved to the NG the extreme degree of your mentally
instability........your are indeed insane.

See ya Charlie! plonk

JimH wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Jun 8, 11:44?am, basskisser wrote:
On Jun 8, 11:26 am, Charlie Morgan wrote:





On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 08:18:34 -0700, Chuck Gould
wrote:
On Jun 8, 8:12?am, "Jim" wrote:
And if it bothers you so much, why not simply edit the title back
to
the original, racist thread. Is it because the KKK post is less
important to you than having something to bitch about?
Yes it is (Chucky dot)
At least you're more honest than your fellow critic in this thread..
Chuck's mother sucks wet green donkey dick. The video is circulating
all over the internet.
CWM
And here I thought JimH was the best here at saying nasty, crude and
untrue things about people and their families.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
Why try to expand this squabble to include an innocent bystander?

Charlie Morgan's post has nothing to do with my sainted mother, and
very little to do with me, but does one heck of a lot to define who he
is and how whatever it is he substitutes for a mind attempts to work.
Obviously the poor guy needs some professional help- in fact he may
well have computer privileges in some institution where they are
already attempting to do whatever might be possible for him. In my
opinion, somebody that ill deserves our concern, and when appropriate
even perhaps prayers for his speedy and full recovery. How could any
decent person be mad at a guy so obviously unable to control himself?
It would be like yelling at a six month old baby for soiling a diaper.

JimH doesn't deserve to be tarred with the same brush. He's behaving
like a gentleman, and he ought to be treated with appropriate respect.
(The heaviest thing anybody will ever carry is a grudge).

Normally, when somebody doesn't like me it simply indicates that they
are an astute judge of character. :-) Making obscene remarks about my
mother shows a really sick and twisted personality for what it
is.......and as I said earlier it's a compliment to be considered an a-
hole by his standards.



Thanks Chuck.

One using a 'handle' without revealing his/her actual identity, such as
'basskisser', is posting anonymously and would not normally say the things
if posting under his/her real name (Charlie Morgan may be an exception to
that). In actuality, there can be millions of 'basskissers' posting on the
internet. How can you insult a fictional and anonymous character?

That is quite different than one posting with their real name/id, especially
when someone decides to direct personal attacks and insults to that person's
wife, mother or other family members.

The bottom line is that Charlie was way out of bounds and owes you an
apology.




We have a number of dirtbags here who try to hide behind false ids so
they can dump their insults with impunity.

On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 21:59:48 GMT, Charlie Morgan wrote:


Chuck_ the_ **** is doing what he does as a cry for attention. I'm merely giving
him some attention he didn't figure on. Over time I've seen many folks try to
reason with him, and politely ask him to stop his moronic and counter-productive
crusade. Chuck has ignored them. He imagines he knows something that they don't,
and so he continues. The way I see it, Chuck_the_ schmuck should be apologizing
to me and everyone else he offends with his reposting of racist spam.

Chuck can stop his idiotic chuckie-dot crusade at any time, and then I will no
longer have any reason to talk about his mother. Until then, I maintain that she
does squat thrusts on fire hydrants.

CWM

You, Charlie, appear to be the one crying for attention. There are a couple
'Chuck antagonists' who probably think you're a pretty neat guy for doing
what you do.

Those with any sense see you for what you are.

Jim wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
oups.com...
Tell you what, Jim.....the next time I launch a thread titled "The
Cheney/Bush Lie continues to cost us some of our best and brightest",

Better check with Harry before you launch this one (Chucky dot)



**** Harry.

"John H." wrote in message
...
snip...
You, Charlie, appear to be the one crying for attention. There are a
couple
'Chuck antagonists' who probably think you're a pretty neat guy for doing
what you do.
snip...


You sure do talk stupid at times John.
There are probably a dozen posters who have been stung by Chuck's poison
pen, but I doubt any would encourage attacks against family members.
Why do you always try to facilitate trouble?

Don White wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
snip...
You, Charlie, appear to be the one crying for attention. There are a
couple
'Chuck antagonists' who probably think you're a pretty neat guy for doing
what you do.
snip...


You sure do talk stupid at times John.
There are probably a dozen posters who have been stung by Chuck's poison
pen, but I doubt any would encourage attacks against family members.
Why do you always try to facilitate trouble?



Review your contributions to this NG and get back to us, Donnie.

On Fri, 8 Jun 2007 22:49:50 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
.. .
snip...
You, Charlie, appear to be the one crying for attention. There are a
couple
'Chuck antagonists' who probably think you're a pretty neat guy for doing
what you do.
snip...


You sure do talk stupid at times John.
There are probably a dozen posters who have been stung by Chuck's poison
pen, but I doubt any would encourage attacks against family members.
Why do you always try to facilitate trouble?


Donnie, did you read the part you snipped?

You pick the category into which you fit.

"Dan" wrote in message
hlink.net...

Review your contributions to this NG and get back to us, Donnie.

........and speaking about trouble..... right on cue.....

"John H." wrote in message
...


Donnie, did you read the part you snipped?

You pick the category into which you fit.

Try fitting yourself into a catagory & we'll let you know how delusional
you are.