Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2007
Posts: 125
Default Insurance co survey shows boaters are willing to pay higher fuelprices.....

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On 10 Apr 2007 19:09:52 -0700, "Chuck Gould"
wrote:

On Apr 10, 5:07?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On 10 Apr 2007 16:36:15 -0700, "Chuck Gould"

wrote:
ower boaters and bass boaters say gas prices would have to reach
$3.26 and $3.17 respectively before they would use their boats less
often. That's 50 cents more per gallon than they said last year.
Horse feathers.

I'm already hearing bass tournement types saying they are cutting back
on the number of tourneys they will be attending this year and will
only be doing local and state tourneys rather than out of state
tourneys.

And my club is starting a share a ride program for fishing this year
becaue of fuel prices.


Everybody will have a different individual perspective. I thought
perhaps the survey results would stir up discussion, and they
have. :-)

I don't have an enormous fuel bill, primarily because I only burn
about 2 gph.
As we begin considering options for our "retirement" boat (purchase is
still several years away) I have been wrestling with the prospect of
perhaps burning a lot more fuel at a future price of a lot more per
gallon.

I keep coming back around to this line of reasoning, (and I don't know
whether it makes any sense to people who are burning a lot of fuel-
because I can't say I've been there, done that):

When you've got maybe $100k- $150k invested in a walkaround fishboat
and outboard, or perhaps $200k -$1mm or more invested in a somewhat
larger cruising boat- would the fact that fuel costs increased from
(for example) $2500 for a summer to (for example) $5000 be sufficient
reason to curtail the use of the boat?

The old adage, "Fuel is the least expensive thing you will ever put
into a boat" may not be as true as it once was, but when all of the
other costs associated with boating are factored in it doesn't seem
like it should be a deal breaker in a lot of cases.


I understand your point and to an extent, agree with it. For those
who own boats of that class, it's probably true to some extent.

For the average schmuck, that just isn't true. It's a little tougher
to drop $150 bucks of gas in the family runabout on a weekend when it
costs you $150 bucks a week in gas to get the parents to work.

Maybe I'm over estimating, or under estimating, the ability of the
average boating consumer, but from what I'm hearing from my club
members and other sources, the average joe just ain't gonna use his
boat all that much.



Fortunately, I have three buddies who like to go fishing almost every
week, and are more than willing to kick in $20 each for gasoline. At 10
gallons an hour at cruising speed, that helps defray the fuel costs
considerably. Anyone who claims high fuel prices aren't going to put a
crimp in boating is smoking dope.
  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Tim Tim is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,107
Default Insurance co survey shows boaters are willing to pay higher fuel prices.....

On Apr 11, 7:05 am, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On 10 Apr 2007 19:09:52 -0700, "Chuck Gould"





wrote:
On Apr 10, 5:07?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On 10 Apr 2007 16:36:15 -0700, "Chuck Gould"


wrote:
ower boaters and bass boaters say gas prices would have to reach
$3.26 and $3.17 respectively before they would use their boats less
often. That's 50 cents more per gallon than they said last year.


Horse feathers.


I'm already hearing bass tournement types saying they are cutting back
on the number of tourneys they will be attending this year and will
only be doing local and state tourneys rather than out of state
tourneys.


And my club is starting a share a ride program for fishing this year
becaue of fuel prices.


Everybody will have a different individual perspective. I thought
perhaps the survey results would stir up discussion, and they
have. :-)


I don't have an enormous fuel bill, primarily because I only burn
about 2 gph.
As we begin considering options for our "retirement" boat (purchase is
still several years away) I have been wrestling with the prospect of
perhaps burning a lot more fuel at a future price of a lot more per
gallon.


I keep coming back around to this line of reasoning, (and I don't know
whether it makes any sense to people who are burning a lot of fuel-
because I can't say I've been there, done that):


When you've got maybe $100k- $150k invested in a walkaround fishboat
and outboard, or perhaps $200k -$1mm or more invested in a somewhat
larger cruising boat- would the fact that fuel costs increased from
(for example) $2500 for a summer to (for example) $5000 be sufficient
reason to curtail the use of the boat?


The old adage, "Fuel is the least expensive thing you will ever put
into a boat" may not be as true as it once was, but when all of the
other costs associated with boating are factored in it doesn't seem
like it should be a deal breaker in a lot of cases.


I understand your point and to an extent, agree with it. For those
who own boats of that class, it's probably true to some extent.

For the average schmuck, that just isn't true. It's a little tougher
to drop $150 bucks of gas in the family runabout on a weekend when it
costs you $150 bucks a week in gas to get the parents to work.

Maybe I'm over estimating, or under estimating, the ability of the
average boating consumer, but from what I'm hearing from my club
members and other sources, the average joe just ain't gonna use his
boat all that much.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Yes, I know some people that have to commute some distances to work
and their fuel bill is enormous compared to ours. The wife works 7
mi. away from our home, and I work a 4 mi. distance.

Granted We're not avid boaters, but we went out at least 10 times
last year, which for our scheduling, was a goodly amount, and we'll
probably do the same this year.

If it looks like the big boat is going to take too much of a gulp out
of the wallet, well, there's always the little one to fall back on.

  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,727
Default Insurance co survey shows boaters are willing to pay higher fuel prices.....


"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On 10 Apr 2007 19:09:52 -0700, "Chuck Gould"
wrote:

On Apr 10, 5:07?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On 10 Apr 2007 16:36:15 -0700, "Chuck Gould"

wrote:
ower boaters and bass boaters say gas prices would have to reach
$3.26 and $3.17 respectively before they would use their boats less
often. That's 50 cents more per gallon than they said last year.

Horse feathers.

I'm already hearing bass tournement types saying they are cutting back
on the number of tourneys they will be attending this year and will
only be doing local and state tourneys rather than out of state
tourneys.

And my club is starting a share a ride program for fishing this year
becaue of fuel prices.



Everybody will have a different individual perspective. I thought
perhaps the survey results would stir up discussion, and they
have. :-)

I don't have an enormous fuel bill, primarily because I only burn
about 2 gph.
As we begin considering options for our "retirement" boat (purchase is
still several years away) I have been wrestling with the prospect of
perhaps burning a lot more fuel at a future price of a lot more per
gallon.

I keep coming back around to this line of reasoning, (and I don't know
whether it makes any sense to people who are burning a lot of fuel-
because I can't say I've been there, done that):

When you've got maybe $100k- $150k invested in a walkaround fishboat
and outboard, or perhaps $200k -$1mm or more invested in a somewhat
larger cruising boat- would the fact that fuel costs increased from
(for example) $2500 for a summer to (for example) $5000 be sufficient
reason to curtail the use of the boat?

The old adage, "Fuel is the least expensive thing you will ever put
into a boat" may not be as true as it once was, but when all of the
other costs associated with boating are factored in it doesn't seem
like it should be a deal breaker in a lot of cases.


I understand your point and to an extent, agree with it. For those
who own boats of that class, it's probably true to some extent.

For the average schmuck, that just isn't true. It's a little tougher
to drop $150 bucks of gas in the family runabout on a weekend when it
costs you $150 bucks a week in gas to get the parents to work.

Maybe I'm over estimating, or under estimating, the ability of the
average boating consumer, but from what I'm hearing from my club
members and other sources, the average joe just ain't gonna use his
boat all that much.


Unless they have to tow a long ways, I doubt if the weekend trips are much
less for most people. They may use the boat a lot less at the lake while
burning gas, but lots here camp at the lake, and so they will do less skiing
and more anchored up drinking and swimming. But most of the people in the
San Francisco metro area, are not that far from lots of lakes.


  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,117
Default Insurance co survey shows boaters are willing to pay higher fuel prices.....

On Apr 10, 5:07?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On 10 Apr 2007 16:36:15 -0700, "Chuck Gould"

wrote:
ower boaters and bass boaters say gas prices would have to reach
$3.26 and $3.17 respectively before they would use their boats less
often. That's 50 cents more per gallon than they said last year.


Horse feathers.

I'm already hearing bass tournement types saying they are cutting back
on the number of tourneys they will be attending this year and will
only be doing local and state tourneys rather than out of state
tourneys.

And my club is starting a share a ride program for fishing this year
becaue of fuel prices.



Don't some of the bass competitions include some portion of the event
that is dependent upon speed? Something like everybody begins at a
single staring point and then races to get to the hot spots faster
than the competition? This might not be the case, but it's my
impression.

Perhaps if the contest rules were modified to eliminate that 40 knot
sprint the sport would be more affordable? (Just thinking out loud)

  #5   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 10,492
Default Insurance co survey shows boaters are willing to pay higher fuel prices.....

On 10 Apr 2007 19:13:36 -0700, "Chuck Gould"
wrote:

Perhaps if the contest rules were modified to eliminate that 40 knot
sprint the sport would be more affordable?


40 knots?

Those are the slow ones at the back of the pack.



  #6   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,649
Default Insurance co survey shows boaters are willing to pay higher fuel prices.....

On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 22:44:00 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On 10 Apr 2007 19:13:36 -0700, "Chuck Gould"
wrote:

Perhaps if the contest rules were modified to eliminate that 40 knot
sprint the sport would be more affordable?


40 knots?

Those are the slow ones at the back of the pack.


ROTFL!!!

Got that right.
  #7   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,543
Default Insurance co survey shows boaters are willing to pay higher fuel prices.....

On 10 Apr 2007 19:13:36 -0700, "Chuck Gould"
wrote:

On Apr 10, 5:07?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On 10 Apr 2007 16:36:15 -0700, "Chuck Gould"

wrote:
ower boaters and bass boaters say gas prices would have to reach
$3.26 and $3.17 respectively before they would use their boats less
often. That's 50 cents more per gallon than they said last year.


Horse feathers.

I'm already hearing bass tournement types saying they are cutting back
on the number of tourneys they will be attending this year and will
only be doing local and state tourneys rather than out of state
tourneys.

And my club is starting a share a ride program for fishing this year
becaue of fuel prices.



Don't some of the bass competitions include some portion of the event
that is dependent upon speed? Something like everybody begins at a
single staring point and then races to get to the hot spots faster
than the competition? This might not be the case, but it's my
impression.

Perhaps if the contest rules were modified to eliminate that 40 knot
sprint the sport would be more affordable? (Just thinking out loud)


Plus, they have to be back at a certain time for the weigh in. They cut the
time back as short as possible to get that 'last' fish.
--
*****Have a Spectacular Day!*****

John H
  #8   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2007
Posts: 983
Default Insurance co survey shows boaters are willing to pay higher fuel prices.....


"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
ups.com...
Fuel Prices Won't Put a Damper on Vacation Season
Nationwide Insurance survey shows nearly 70 percent of RV, travel
trailer, boat and motorcycle owners willing to "pay to play"




Higher fuel prices will not put a dent in our boating, although (as others
have suggested) they most likely will for those with larger boats.

We are also proceeding with plans for our road trip this fall to Baltimore,
NYC, Boston and Maine.

BTW: If you are planning a long road trip AAA has a great on line fuel cost
calculator with a data base of current pump prices and fuel economies of
various vehicles:

http://www.fuelcostcalculator.com/TripGasprice.aspx



  #9   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,543
Default Insurance co survey shows boaters are willing to pay higher fuel prices.....

On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 17:41:44 -0400, "JimH" wrote:


"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
oups.com...
Fuel Prices Won't Put a Damper on Vacation Season
Nationwide Insurance survey shows nearly 70 percent of RV, travel
trailer, boat and motorcycle owners willing to "pay to play"




Higher fuel prices will not put a dent in our boating, although (as others
have suggested) they most likely will for those with larger boats.

We are also proceeding with plans for our road trip this fall to Baltimore,
NYC, Boston and Maine.

BTW: If you are planning a long road trip AAA has a great on line fuel cost
calculator with a data base of current pump prices and fuel economies of
various vehicles:

http://www.fuelcostcalculator.com/TripGasprice.aspx



Is that for those who can't multiply or divide?
--
*****Have a Spectacular Day!*****

John H
  #10   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,995
Default Insurance co survey shows boaters are willing to pay higher fuel prices.....


"John H." wrote in message
...

Is that for those who can't multiply or divide?
--
*****Have a Spectacular Day!*****

John H



Was that what you'd consider a 'cheap shot' John?




Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gasoline prices.............. JimH General 137 January 23rd 07 09:14 AM
Canada's Health Care Crisis - update Scott Weiser General 53 July 3rd 05 11:09 PM
Shady Billing Practices of IMIS Insurance Geoff Schultz Cruising 46 July 6th 04 04:44 PM
Fuel saving tips Gould 0738 General 55 June 5th 04 11:54 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017