Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On 10 Apr 2007 19:09:52 -0700, "Chuck Gould" wrote: On Apr 10, 5:07?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On 10 Apr 2007 16:36:15 -0700, "Chuck Gould" wrote: ower boaters and bass boaters say gas prices would have to reach $3.26 and $3.17 respectively before they would use their boats less often. That's 50 cents more per gallon than they said last year. Horse feathers. I'm already hearing bass tournement types saying they are cutting back on the number of tourneys they will be attending this year and will only be doing local and state tourneys rather than out of state tourneys. And my club is starting a share a ride program for fishing this year becaue of fuel prices. Everybody will have a different individual perspective. I thought perhaps the survey results would stir up discussion, and they have. :-) I don't have an enormous fuel bill, primarily because I only burn about 2 gph. As we begin considering options for our "retirement" boat (purchase is still several years away) I have been wrestling with the prospect of perhaps burning a lot more fuel at a future price of a lot more per gallon. I keep coming back around to this line of reasoning, (and I don't know whether it makes any sense to people who are burning a lot of fuel- because I can't say I've been there, done that): When you've got maybe $100k- $150k invested in a walkaround fishboat and outboard, or perhaps $200k -$1mm or more invested in a somewhat larger cruising boat- would the fact that fuel costs increased from (for example) $2500 for a summer to (for example) $5000 be sufficient reason to curtail the use of the boat? The old adage, "Fuel is the least expensive thing you will ever put into a boat" may not be as true as it once was, but when all of the other costs associated with boating are factored in it doesn't seem like it should be a deal breaker in a lot of cases. I understand your point and to an extent, agree with it. For those who own boats of that class, it's probably true to some extent. For the average schmuck, that just isn't true. It's a little tougher to drop $150 bucks of gas in the family runabout on a weekend when it costs you $150 bucks a week in gas to get the parents to work. Maybe I'm over estimating, or under estimating, the ability of the average boating consumer, but from what I'm hearing from my club members and other sources, the average joe just ain't gonna use his boat all that much. Fortunately, I have three buddies who like to go fishing almost every week, and are more than willing to kick in $20 each for gasoline. At 10 gallons an hour at cruising speed, that helps defray the fuel costs considerably. Anyone who claims high fuel prices aren't going to put a crimp in boating is smoking dope. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 11, 7:05 am, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On 10 Apr 2007 19:09:52 -0700, "Chuck Gould" wrote: On Apr 10, 5:07?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On 10 Apr 2007 16:36:15 -0700, "Chuck Gould" wrote: ower boaters and bass boaters say gas prices would have to reach $3.26 and $3.17 respectively before they would use their boats less often. That's 50 cents more per gallon than they said last year. Horse feathers. I'm already hearing bass tournement types saying they are cutting back on the number of tourneys they will be attending this year and will only be doing local and state tourneys rather than out of state tourneys. And my club is starting a share a ride program for fishing this year becaue of fuel prices. Everybody will have a different individual perspective. I thought perhaps the survey results would stir up discussion, and they have. :-) I don't have an enormous fuel bill, primarily because I only burn about 2 gph. As we begin considering options for our "retirement" boat (purchase is still several years away) I have been wrestling with the prospect of perhaps burning a lot more fuel at a future price of a lot more per gallon. I keep coming back around to this line of reasoning, (and I don't know whether it makes any sense to people who are burning a lot of fuel- because I can't say I've been there, done that): When you've got maybe $100k- $150k invested in a walkaround fishboat and outboard, or perhaps $200k -$1mm or more invested in a somewhat larger cruising boat- would the fact that fuel costs increased from (for example) $2500 for a summer to (for example) $5000 be sufficient reason to curtail the use of the boat? The old adage, "Fuel is the least expensive thing you will ever put into a boat" may not be as true as it once was, but when all of the other costs associated with boating are factored in it doesn't seem like it should be a deal breaker in a lot of cases. I understand your point and to an extent, agree with it. For those who own boats of that class, it's probably true to some extent. For the average schmuck, that just isn't true. It's a little tougher to drop $150 bucks of gas in the family runabout on a weekend when it costs you $150 bucks a week in gas to get the parents to work. Maybe I'm over estimating, or under estimating, the ability of the average boating consumer, but from what I'm hearing from my club members and other sources, the average joe just ain't gonna use his boat all that much.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yes, I know some people that have to commute some distances to work and their fuel bill is enormous compared to ours. The wife works 7 mi. away from our home, and I work a 4 mi. distance. Granted We're not avid boaters, but we went out at least 10 times last year, which for our scheduling, was a goodly amount, and we'll probably do the same this year. If it looks like the big boat is going to take too much of a gulp out of the wallet, well, there's always the little one to fall back on. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On 10 Apr 2007 19:09:52 -0700, "Chuck Gould" wrote: On Apr 10, 5:07?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On 10 Apr 2007 16:36:15 -0700, "Chuck Gould" wrote: ower boaters and bass boaters say gas prices would have to reach $3.26 and $3.17 respectively before they would use their boats less often. That's 50 cents more per gallon than they said last year. Horse feathers. I'm already hearing bass tournement types saying they are cutting back on the number of tourneys they will be attending this year and will only be doing local and state tourneys rather than out of state tourneys. And my club is starting a share a ride program for fishing this year becaue of fuel prices. Everybody will have a different individual perspective. I thought perhaps the survey results would stir up discussion, and they have. :-) I don't have an enormous fuel bill, primarily because I only burn about 2 gph. As we begin considering options for our "retirement" boat (purchase is still several years away) I have been wrestling with the prospect of perhaps burning a lot more fuel at a future price of a lot more per gallon. I keep coming back around to this line of reasoning, (and I don't know whether it makes any sense to people who are burning a lot of fuel- because I can't say I've been there, done that): When you've got maybe $100k- $150k invested in a walkaround fishboat and outboard, or perhaps $200k -$1mm or more invested in a somewhat larger cruising boat- would the fact that fuel costs increased from (for example) $2500 for a summer to (for example) $5000 be sufficient reason to curtail the use of the boat? The old adage, "Fuel is the least expensive thing you will ever put into a boat" may not be as true as it once was, but when all of the other costs associated with boating are factored in it doesn't seem like it should be a deal breaker in a lot of cases. I understand your point and to an extent, agree with it. For those who own boats of that class, it's probably true to some extent. For the average schmuck, that just isn't true. It's a little tougher to drop $150 bucks of gas in the family runabout on a weekend when it costs you $150 bucks a week in gas to get the parents to work. Maybe I'm over estimating, or under estimating, the ability of the average boating consumer, but from what I'm hearing from my club members and other sources, the average joe just ain't gonna use his boat all that much. Unless they have to tow a long ways, I doubt if the weekend trips are much less for most people. They may use the boat a lot less at the lake while burning gas, but lots here camp at the lake, and so they will do less skiing and more anchored up drinking and swimming. But most of the people in the San Francisco metro area, are not that far from lots of lakes. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 10, 5:07?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On 10 Apr 2007 16:36:15 -0700, "Chuck Gould" wrote: ower boaters and bass boaters say gas prices would have to reach $3.26 and $3.17 respectively before they would use their boats less often. That's 50 cents more per gallon than they said last year. Horse feathers. I'm already hearing bass tournement types saying they are cutting back on the number of tourneys they will be attending this year and will only be doing local and state tourneys rather than out of state tourneys. And my club is starting a share a ride program for fishing this year becaue of fuel prices. Don't some of the bass competitions include some portion of the event that is dependent upon speed? Something like everybody begins at a single staring point and then races to get to the hot spots faster than the competition? This might not be the case, but it's my impression. Perhaps if the contest rules were modified to eliminate that 40 knot sprint the sport would be more affordable? (Just thinking out loud) |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10 Apr 2007 19:13:36 -0700, "Chuck Gould"
wrote: Perhaps if the contest rules were modified to eliminate that 40 knot sprint the sport would be more affordable? 40 knots? Those are the slow ones at the back of the pack. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 22:44:00 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote: On 10 Apr 2007 19:13:36 -0700, "Chuck Gould" wrote: Perhaps if the contest rules were modified to eliminate that 40 knot sprint the sport would be more affordable? 40 knots? Those are the slow ones at the back of the pack. ROTFL!!! Got that right. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10 Apr 2007 19:13:36 -0700, "Chuck Gould"
wrote: On Apr 10, 5:07?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On 10 Apr 2007 16:36:15 -0700, "Chuck Gould" wrote: ower boaters and bass boaters say gas prices would have to reach $3.26 and $3.17 respectively before they would use their boats less often. That's 50 cents more per gallon than they said last year. Horse feathers. I'm already hearing bass tournement types saying they are cutting back on the number of tourneys they will be attending this year and will only be doing local and state tourneys rather than out of state tourneys. And my club is starting a share a ride program for fishing this year becaue of fuel prices. Don't some of the bass competitions include some portion of the event that is dependent upon speed? Something like everybody begins at a single staring point and then races to get to the hot spots faster than the competition? This might not be the case, but it's my impression. Perhaps if the contest rules were modified to eliminate that 40 knot sprint the sport would be more affordable? (Just thinking out loud) Plus, they have to be back at a certain time for the weigh in. They cut the time back as short as possible to get that 'last' fish. -- *****Have a Spectacular Day!***** John H |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chuck Gould" wrote in message ups.com... Fuel Prices Won't Put a Damper on Vacation Season Nationwide Insurance survey shows nearly 70 percent of RV, travel trailer, boat and motorcycle owners willing to "pay to play" Higher fuel prices will not put a dent in our boating, although (as others have suggested) they most likely will for those with larger boats. We are also proceeding with plans for our road trip this fall to Baltimore, NYC, Boston and Maine. BTW: If you are planning a long road trip AAA has a great on line fuel cost calculator with a data base of current pump prices and fuel economies of various vehicles: http://www.fuelcostcalculator.com/TripGasprice.aspx |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 17:41:44 -0400, "JimH" wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message oups.com... Fuel Prices Won't Put a Damper on Vacation Season Nationwide Insurance survey shows nearly 70 percent of RV, travel trailer, boat and motorcycle owners willing to "pay to play" Higher fuel prices will not put a dent in our boating, although (as others have suggested) they most likely will for those with larger boats. We are also proceeding with plans for our road trip this fall to Baltimore, NYC, Boston and Maine. BTW: If you are planning a long road trip AAA has a great on line fuel cost calculator with a data base of current pump prices and fuel economies of various vehicles: http://www.fuelcostcalculator.com/TripGasprice.aspx Is that for those who can't multiply or divide? -- *****Have a Spectacular Day!***** John H |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John H." wrote in message ... Is that for those who can't multiply or divide? -- *****Have a Spectacular Day!***** John H Was that what you'd consider a 'cheap shot' John? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Gasoline prices.............. | General | |||
Canada's Health Care Crisis - update | General | |||
Shady Billing Practices of IMIS Insurance | Cruising | |||
Fuel saving tips | General |