Chuck Gould wrote:
On Mar 26, 7:41?am, Harry Krause wrote:
Jim wrote:
Harry,
Was that an actual word count, or were you just guestimating? How do you
know it was whining bull****?
Chuckie's loyal supporter,
Florida Jim
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
. ..
Chuck Gould wrote:
...another 300 words of whining b.s. :
Whine, whine, whine. You hang up a politically oriented cut 'n paste
and then moan how your free speech is infringed upon. Here's a flash,
Tom- you've got to say something to be speaking- not just dredging up
some crap that you hope will serve your admitted purpose; fostering
"chaos" in the newsgroup.
It was a guesstimate. I'm pretty good at guesstimating the number of
words in a paragraph. Been doing it for 40 years.

How do I know it was whining B.S.? Easy. It was one of Chuck's
overwrought, overwritten tomes posted in response to one of his
netcopping tirades. Whenever Chuck plays netcop, he's overwrought and
whining, and his posts are too long.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Then don't read them, Krause.

Oh, wait----- your entire purpose for participating in this group is
to make nasty personal remarks in response to various people. I guess
if you filtered everybody you rail against here you'd have nothing to
do. :-)


Not to worry, Chuck. I usually do not read more than a couple of words
of your netcopping posts, and rarely more than a couple of sentences of
your pimping for boat manufacturers' purple prose posts.

On Mar 26, 9:36?am, Harry Krause wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:
On Mar 26, 7:41?am, Harry Krause wrote:
Jim wrote:
Harry,
Was that an actual word count, or were you just guestimating? How do you
know it was whining bull****?
Chuckie's loyal supporter,
Florida Jim
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
om...
Chuck Gould wrote:
...another 300 words of whining b.s. :
Whine, whine, whine. You hang up a politically oriented cut 'n paste
and then moan how your free speech is infringed upon. Here's a flash,
Tom- you've got to say something to be speaking- not just dredging up
some crap that you hope will serve your admitted purpose; fostering
"chaos" in the newsgroup.
It was a guesstimate. I'm pretty good at guesstimating the number of
words in a paragraph. Been doing it for 40 years.

How do I know it was whining B.S.? Easy. It was one of Chuck's
overwrought, overwritten tomes posted in response to one of his
netcopping tirades. Whenever Chuck plays netcop, he's overwrought and
whining, and his posts are too long.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Then don't read them, Krause.

Oh, wait----- your entire purpose for participating in this group is
to make nasty personal remarks in response to various people. I guess
if you filtered everybody you rail against here you'd have nothing to
do. :-)

Not to worry, Chuck. I usually do not read more than a couple of words
of your netcopping posts, and rarely more than a couple of sentences of
your pimping for boat manufacturers' purple prose posts.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

So your scathing commentaries are based on reading either a "couple of
words" or a "couple of sentences"? I'm not surprised. Once again, you
don't really know what you're going on and on about. It's true that I
don't write incredibly well, and have never claimed that I do. But if
you hope to have your criticisms respected you shouldn't admit to
firing off your negative stink bombs without actually reading the
material upon which you're remarking.

Of course you won't reply to this, you'll stop reading after "So
your." :-)

Chuck Gould wrote:

Not to worry, Chuck. I usually do not read more than a couple of words
of your netcopping posts, and rarely more than a couple of sentences of
your pimping for boat manufacturers' purple prose posts.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

So your scathing commentaries are based on reading either a "couple of
words" or a "couple of sentences"? I'm not surprised. Once again, you
don't really know what you're going on and on about. It's true that I
don't write incredibly well, and have never claimed that I do. But if
you hope to have your criticisms respected you shouldn't admit to
firing off your negative stink bombs without actually reading the
material upon which you're remarking.

Of course you won't reply to this, you'll stop reading after "So
your." :-)


Not to worry, Chuck. I've been editing copy for a long time. I can tell
after reading a sentence or three whether what follows is going to be
wheat or chaff. Most of your posts are chaff.