Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12 Mar 2007 14:34:02 -0700, "Chuck Gould"
wrote: The prices at which boats are actually selling determine the true market value. Exactly. And I guarentee you they aren't selling at $10/12000. |
#12
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 12, 3:10?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On 12 Mar 2007 14:34:02 -0700, "Chuck Gould" wrote: The prices at which boats are actually selling determine the true market value. Exactly. And I guarentee you they aren't selling at $10/12000. That's odd- the original poster in this thread just reported paying $10,000 for one of these. (And an examination of 64 different boat ads discloses that $10,000 is a common offering price for this model, with some examples a few thousand higher and some examples a few thousand less). Did he overpay by 66% because NADA says he did, or did he shop around and decide to pay that price based on comparable offerings? That's the focus of the question. |
#13
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12 Mar 2007 16:33:10 -0700, "Chuck Gould"
wrote: On Mar 12, 3:10?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On 12 Mar 2007 14:34:02 -0700, "Chuck Gould" wrote: The prices at which boats are actually selling determine the true market value. Exactly. And I guarentee you they aren't selling at $10/12000. That's odd- the original poster in this thread just reported paying $10,000 for one of these. (And an examination of 64 different boat ads discloses that $10,000 is a common offering price for this model, with some examples a few thousand higher and some examples a few thousand less). Did he overpay by 66% because NADA says he did, or did he shop around and decide to pay that price based on comparable offerings? That's the focus of the question. You obviously know more than anybody here about the subject. I bow to your expertise. |
#14
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 12, 6:13 pm, Gene Kearns
89 Bayliners make excellent submarines. and reefs Why do you think they're called "Bay-liners?" |
#15
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
also easy to clean the cabin after the deck pops off.
JR Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute wrote: In message ups.com, brian sprach forth the following: 89 Bayliners make excellent submarines. -- -------------------------------------------------------------- Home Page: http://www.seanet.com/~jasonrnorth If |
#16
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 21:00:28 -0400, Gene Kearns
wrote: On 12 Mar 2007 16:33:10 -0700, Chuck Gould penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: On Mar 12, 3:10?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On 12 Mar 2007 14:34:02 -0700, "Chuck Gould" wrote: The prices at which boats are actually selling determine the true market value. Exactly. And I guarentee you they aren't selling at $10/12000. That's odd- the original poster in this thread just reported paying $10,000 for one of these. (And an examination of 64 different boat ads discloses that $10,000 is a common offering price for this model, with some examples a few thousand higher and some examples a few thousand less). Did he overpay by 66% because NADA says he did, or did he shop around and decide to pay that price based on comparable offerings? That's the focus of the question. Jeeze, Chuck..... an "offering price" is nearly always a *reality check* for these price point boats. Based on local selling/buying he most likely got stung. His market might be *really different,* but I don't know why..... No, let's not beat up Chuck - he has a lot of experience in this area and I for one will take his word that NADA is not used by boat dealers of any good repute. I'm sure that all those Bayliner owners will sell their boats for well north of the listed NADA price. I'll take Chuck at his word. |
#17
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12 Mar 2007 18:03:51 -0700, "Tim" wrote:
On Mar 12, 6:13 pm, Gene Kearns 89 Bayliners make excellent submarines. and reefs Why do you think they're called "Bay-liners?" Ok - that was funny. :) |
#18
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 12, 6:00?pm, Gene Kearns
wrote: On 12 Mar 2007 16:33:10 -0700, Chuck Gould penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: On Mar 12, 3:10?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On 12 Mar 2007 14:34:02 -0700, "Chuck Gould" wrote: The prices at which boats are actually selling determine the true market value. Exactly. And I guarentee you they aren't selling at $10/12000. That's odd- the original poster in this thread just reported paying $10,000 for one of these. (And an examination of 64 different boat ads discloses that $10,000 is a common offering price for this model, with some examples a few thousand higher and some examples a few thousand less). Did he overpay by 66% because NADA says he did, or did he shop around and decide to pay that price based on comparable offerings? That's the focus of the question. Jeeze, Chuck..... an "offering price" is nearly always a *reality check* for these price point boats. Based on local selling/buying he most likely got stung. His market might be *really different,* but I don't know why..... It's tough to craft a convincing argument that there is no resale market for the most popular selling boat new boat in the world. I haven't seen the guy's boat. It could be a real Turdship, or not. I wouldn't begin to say what the boat is worth without seeing it, nor should others. Unless a market is locally depressed for a particular model (as you say yours is for all Bayliners), there is going to be reslae activity at a general price level. The skeptic pipes up and says, "But how do you know that those 40 some out of 60 people advertising their boats for 40-100% (and more) above the NADA are getting those prices?" Obviously, we don't. However, we do have a general indicator. People with a boat on the market always tend to start high. Human nature. When a boat goes unsold for week after week, the advertised price starts getting a little softer. In most cases, the price drops at a slow but steady pace until the phone starts to ring. Joila! That's the price that will lkely attract a buyer in the local market. The fact that very, very few of the Bayliners similar to the one the original poster just bought are priced down even close to the "high retail" in NADA is a pretty good indicator that the street price is a lot higher than the NADA fantasy figure. The boats are being sold and disappear from the market before the sellers have to get down to such a low number. No serious marine lenders in our region use NADA for anything boating related. A couple of credit unions do- but only because their loan underwriting guidelines require them to do so. I'll never forget a go-around I had with a local credit union one time. A guy came in and put money on a boat, and said he was going to arrange his own financing. Fine. As I remember, he made better than just an "OK" deal on about a 35-foot boat. He called me two days later, mad as heck. He'd stopped payment on his deposit check, and accused me of trying to rip him off. "My credit union showed me the NADA," he said. "Even with all the options figured in, you were charging me over $30,000 too much for the boat!" (The transaction price was about $150,000). I sent him copies of the reported sales prices for the same boat in our region. I sent him copies of the advertised asking prices for the same boat in our region. I reminded him that he had been shopping and comparing for several months before he made the offer on the boat. He said, "The only people I can count on to be on my side in this whole deal is my credit union. They're telling me that you're trying to rip me off, and that's the end of the story as far as we're concerned." Finally I called the credit union. "Sorry," said the loan officer. "We adhere stricly to the NADA guidelines." "So how many boat loans do you write?" I asked. "Almost none. Everybody comes in with a deal that's so far over book we're not allowed to make the loan." In other words, "the rest of the army is out of step". I ran into the same customer several months later. I asked him what sort of boat he finally ended up with. "Oh, we haven't bought a boat yet. We can't find anybody honest enough to sell us one for what NADA and the credit union says we should pay." |
#19
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 12, 9:52�pm, "Chuck Gould" wrote:
On Mar 12, 6:00?pm, Gene Kearns wrote: On 12 Mar 2007 16:33:10 -0700, Chuck Gould penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: On Mar 12, 3:10?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On 12 Mar 2007 14:34:02 -0700, "Chuck Gould" wrote: The prices at which boats are actually selling determine the true market value. Exactly. And I guarentee you they aren't selling at $10/12000. That's odd- the original poster in this thread just reported paying $10,000 for one of these. (And an examination of 64 different boat ads discloses that $10,000 is a common offering price for this model, with some examples a few thousand higher and some examples a few thousand less). Did he overpay by 66% because NADA says he did, or did he shop around and decide to pay that price based on comparable offerings? That's the focus of the question. Jeeze, Chuck..... an "offering price" is nearly always a *reality check* for these price point boats. Based on local selling/buying he most likely got stung. His market might be *really different,* but I don't know why..... It's tough to craft a convincing argument that there is no resale market for the most popular selling boat new boat in the world. I haven't seen the guy's boat. It could be a real Turdship, or not. I wouldn't begin to say what the boat is worth without seeing it, nor should others. Unless a market is locally depressed for a particular model (as you say yours is for all Bayliners), there is going to be reslae activity at a general price level. The skeptic pipes up and says, "But how do you know that those 40 some out of 60 people advertising their boats for 40-100% (and more) above the NADA are getting those prices?" *Obviously, we don't. However, we do have a general indicator. People with a boat on the market always tend to start high. Human nature. When a boat goes unsold for week after week, the advertised price starts getting a little softer. In most cases, the price drops at a slow but steady pace until the phone starts to ring. Joila! That's the price that will lkely attract a buyer in the local market. The fact that very, very few of the Bayliners similar to the one the original poster just bought are priced down even close to the "high retail" in NADA is a pretty good indicator that the street price is a lot higher than the NADA fantasy figure. The boats are being sold and disappear from the market before the sellers have to get down to such a low number. No serious marine lenders in our region use NADA for anything boating related. A couple of credit unions do- but only because their loan underwriting guidelines require them to do so. I'll never forget a go-around I had with a local credit union one time. A guy came in and put money on a boat, and said he was going to arrange his own financing. Fine. As I remember, he made better than just an "OK" deal on about a 35-foot boat. He called me two days later, mad as heck. He'd stopped payment on his deposit check, and accused me of trying to rip him off. "My credit union showed me the NADA," he said. "Even with all the options figured in, you were charging me over $30,000 too much for the boat!" (The transaction price was about $150,000). I sent him copies of the reported sales prices for the same boat in our region. I sent him copies of the advertised asking prices for the same boat in our region. I reminded him that he had been shopping and comparing for several months before he made the offer on the boat. *He said, "The only people I can count on to be on my side in this whole deal is my credit union. They're telling me that you're trying to rip me off, and that's the end of the story as far as we're concerned." Finally I called the credit union. "Sorry," said the loan officer. "We adhere stricly to the NADA guidelines." "So how many boat loans do you write?" I asked. "Almost none. Everybody comes in with a deal that's so far over book we're not allowed to make the loan." In other words, "the rest of the army is out of step". I ran into the same customer several months later. I asked him what sort of boat he finally ended up with. "Oh, we haven't bought a boat yet. We can't find anybody honest enough to sell us one for what NADA and the credit union says we should pay."- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Pretty interesting, Chuck. |
#20
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I haven't followed this thread, but I am wondering why NADA is used. Years ago I bought the BUC books and, if I recall correctly, their boat value estimates are based on actual sales by region and by condition. Eisboch |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A Bayliner thread | General | |||
Where online to get manual for 1990, 2651 bayliner ciera sunbridge?? Help plz | General | |||
towing a bayliner ciera 2655 with a volvo xc90 2.5T AWD? | General | |||
Prop Size 1990 Bayliner 22.55 Ciera Sunbridge | General | |||
FS: 1989 29ft Bayliner 2995 Avanti in Kingston, Ontario, Canada | Marketplace |