Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
According to an item in the Marine Business Journal, a legal decision
in a lawsuit pressed by a group called "Northwest Envionmental Advocates" has potential implications for every pleasure boater operating in US waters. In an effort to prohibit the discharge of ballast water from foreign vessels (and reduce the liklihood of introducing foreign plants and animals to local eco-systems) the Environmental Advocates sucessfully argued that any vessel discharging any liquid or material of any type must first obtain a permit from the state in which the discharge is going to take place. (As a condition of granting the permit, most states will demand the right to inspect the vessel, ensure that all available pollution controls are installed and properly maintained, and may even want to monitor the discharge- at the vessel's expense). One small oversight: Unlike previous versions of similar regulations, the legal ruling does not exempt pleasure vessels from the requirement to obtain a discharge permit. As a result, everything from cooling water cycling through an engine to water running off of a deck can be considered a "discharge" and is technically subject to state permit! The NMMA is lobbying congress for a revision of the law. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
So where is...................... | General | |||
Who Am I | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General |