On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 11:15:08 -0500, RJSmithers
wrote:

Tom Francis wrote:
On 9 Mar 2007 07:49:20 -0800, "Chuck Gould"
wrote:

In effect, issuing a warning - a misdemeanor - for potentially
violating a law is not accepted law enforcement practice. o put it
another way, the officer in question is issuing warnings for
potentially violating a law when he has no knowledge that the law will
be broken. He can only issue a warning at his discretion if the law
HAS been broken.
And if a boat is operating in Florida without a registration from
either Florida or some other state, a law has been broken.

Well, we ain't gonna change each other's minds on this. :)

Let's agree to disagree.

I totally disagree with your suggestion to "agree to disagree".

Ah well, then we will have to disagree about our agreement to agree to
diagree about the disagreement.

Agreed?

Tom Francis wrote:
On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 11:15:08 -0500, RJSmithers
wrote:

Tom Francis wrote:
On 9 Mar 2007 07:49:20 -0800, "Chuck Gould"
wrote:

In effect, issuing a warning - a misdemeanor - for potentially
violating a law is not accepted law enforcement practice. o put it
another way, the officer in question is issuing warnings for
potentially violating a law when he has no knowledge that the law will
be broken. He can only issue a warning at his discretion if the law
HAS been broken.
And if a boat is operating in Florida without a registration from
either Florida or some other state, a law has been broken.
Well, we ain't gonna change each other's minds on this. :)

Let's agree to disagree.
I totally disagree with your suggestion to "agree to disagree".

Ah well, then we will have to disagree about our agreement to agree to
diagree about the disagreement.

Agreed?

My people will get with your people concerning this matter.

On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 11:48:04 -0500, RJSmithers
wrote:

Tom Francis wrote:
On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 11:15:08 -0500, RJSmithers
wrote:

Tom Francis wrote:
On 9 Mar 2007 07:49:20 -0800, "Chuck Gould"
wrote:

In effect, issuing a warning - a misdemeanor - for potentially
violating a law is not accepted law enforcement practice. o put it
another way, the officer in question is issuing warnings for
potentially violating a law when he has no knowledge that the law will
be broken. He can only issue a warning at his discretion if the law
HAS been broken.
And if a boat is operating in Florida without a registration from
either Florida or some other state, a law has been broken.
Well, we ain't gonna change each other's minds on this. :)

Let's agree to disagree.
I totally disagree with your suggestion to "agree to disagree".

Ah well, then we will have to disagree about our agreement to agree to
diagree about the disagreement.

Agreed?

My people will get with your people concerning this matter.

And I'll have my people disagree with your peoples that we can have an
excuse to do lunch. :)