On Feb 4, 11:19 am, "Bill" wrote:
Jewish Organizations Behind Illegal Immigration Catastrophe

By Prof Kevin McDonald

2-2-7

As in the case of policy in the Middle East, it is no secret that
Jewish
organizations were at the forefront of the immigration policy shift
implemented by the 1965 Act. Consider the assessment of Vanderbilt
University historian Hugh Davis Graham in his book Collision Course:
The Strange Convergence of Affirmative Action and Immigration Policy
in America

"Most important for the content of immigration reform, the driving
force at the core of the movement, reaching back to the 1920s, were
Jewish organizations long active in opposing racial and ethnic quotas
Following the shock of the Holocaust, Jewish leaders had been
especially active in Washington in furthering immigration reform. To
the public, the most visible evidence of the immigration reform drive
was played by Jewish legislative leaders, such as Representative
Celler and Senator Jacob Javits of New York. Less visible, but equally
important, were the efforts of key advisers on presidential and agency
staffs. These included senior policy advisers such as Julius Edelson
and Harry Rosenfield in the Truman administration, Maxwell Rabb in the
Eisenhower White House, and presidential aide Myer Feldman, assistant
secretary of state Abba Schwartz, and deputy attorney general Norbert
Schlei in the Kennedy-Johnson administration."(pp. 56-57)

In the past year, there has been much discussion of illegal
immigration. It tapped into a very large reservoir of public anger
about the lack of control of our borders and, I think, the
transformations that immigration is unleashing. The fact that illegal
immigration is, after all, illegal made it difficult to keep off the
public radar (What part of illegal don't you understand??).

But this contrasts with almost no discussion at all in the Mainstream
Media of the question of the 1,000,000 or so legal immigrants that
come to the U.S. every year-no discussion of their effect on the
economy, social services, crime and competition at elite universities;
no discussion of their effect on the long term ethnic composition of
the U.S. and the displacement of native populations in various sectors
of the economy; and no discussion of whether most Americans really
want all of this. (They don't.) The fact that large scale legal
immigration causes exactly the same difficulties as large scale
illegal inflow is a non-subject.

Those who question the power and influence of the Israel Lobby are
quickly labeled anti-Semites. The terms of choice for anyone who
thinks the U.S. should have any restrictions at all on immigration are
" racist" and "nativist" .

It is exactly the same routine: Media self-censorship, pressure on the
media and politicians who stray from official orthodoxy, and
intimidation via labeling, anathematizing , and ultimately loss of
livelihood.

Of course, there are other issues that fall into the same category of
"not fit for public discussion". Perhaps the main one is the role of
genetic influences on intelligence and behavior.

But the two issues of Israel and immigration relaxation (in the U.S.)
have in common a deep and straightforward Jewish commitment to
particular policies. My contention is that both policies have been
construed by Jewish leaders as being helpful to the security and
political influence of their community.

In the case of Israel, this is self-evident. In the case of
immigration policy, there ample documentation [PDF] of a consistent
interest by the Jewish community, both in America and in Europe, in
ending the hegemony of the host community amongst whom they live. The
measures taken to enforce their chosen objectives suggest there is
indeed an element of truth in what Foxman dismisses as "the old canard
and conspiracy theory of Jewish control of the media, Congress, and
the U.S. government".

I have presented the facts about Jewish influence in both reative
immigration and the Middle East elsewhere. This has been extremely
unwelcome. And it is not at all surprising that the Jewish community
would strenuously resist these conclusions.

Nevertheless, on foreign policy matters what is going on has obviously
become increasingly apparent to a lot of smart people with
intellectual integrity.

As the incoming 110th Congress starts up, a crucial question will be
if this new comprehension will dawn in an area in which, I believe, it
is even more critical: America's post-1965

Kevin MacDonald ] is Professor of Psychology at
California State University-Long Beach. For his website, go tohttp://www.csulb.edu/~kmacd/

Excerpted from Mr. MacDonald's essay Immigration Policy: Is The Other
Boot About To Drop?

http://www.rense.com/general75/imm.htm


Why, oh why, does organized Jewry continue to push anti-White agendas
that will eventually consume their tribe?
gregory

thats funny I heard the same exact argument from jews who were against
immigration. There are real conspiracies in the world by the way, and thats
where we different. Other religions who use their own religion to justify
hate and killings. Thats the point at which the world gets messed up

When people subscribe to drugs,
religious and racial inferiority or superiority to the point of constant
blame or refusing to accept others not like them by promoting hate and
killing and conspiracies , refusing to act loving as parents, and
rational as reasoning people, and constantly choose the same mistakes. Thats
the REAL CONSPIRACIES in the world


wrote in message
ups.com...
On Feb 4, 11:19 am, "Bill" wrote:
Jewish Organizations Behind Illegal Immigration Catastrophe

By Prof Kevin McDonald

2-2-7

As in the case of policy in the Middle East, it is no secret that
Jewish
organizations were at the forefront of the immigration policy shift
implemented by the 1965 Act. Consider the assessment of Vanderbilt
University historian Hugh Davis Graham in his book Collision Course:
The Strange Convergence of Affirmative Action and Immigration Policy
in America

"Most important for the content of immigration reform, the driving
force at the core of the movement, reaching back to the 1920s, were
Jewish organizations long active in opposing racial and ethnic quotas
Following the shock of the Holocaust, Jewish leaders had been
especially active in Washington in furthering immigration reform. To
the public, the most visible evidence of the immigration reform drive
was played by Jewish legislative leaders, such as Representative
Celler and Senator Jacob Javits of New York. Less visible, but equally
important, were the efforts of key advisers on presidential and agency
staffs. These included senior policy advisers such as Julius Edelson
and Harry Rosenfield in the Truman administration, Maxwell Rabb in the
Eisenhower White House, and presidential aide Myer Feldman, assistant
secretary of state Abba Schwartz, and deputy attorney general Norbert
Schlei in the Kennedy-Johnson administration."(pp. 56-57)

In the past year, there has been much discussion of illegal
immigration. It tapped into a very large reservoir of public anger
about the lack of control of our borders and, I think, the
transformations that immigration is unleashing. The fact that illegal
immigration is, after all, illegal made it difficult to keep off the
public radar (What part of illegal don't you understand??).

But this contrasts with almost no discussion at all in the Mainstream
Media of the question of the 1,000,000 or so legal immigrants that
come to the U.S. every year-no discussion of their effect on the
economy, social services, crime and competition at elite universities;
no discussion of their effect on the long term ethnic composition of
the U.S. and the displacement of native populations in various sectors
of the economy; and no discussion of whether most Americans really
want all of this. (They don't.) The fact that large scale legal
immigration causes exactly the same difficulties as large scale
illegal inflow is a non-subject.

Those who question the power and influence of the Israel Lobby are
quickly labeled anti-Semites. The terms of choice for anyone who
thinks the U.S. should have any restrictions at all on immigration are
" racist" and "nativist" .

It is exactly the same routine: Media self-censorship, pressure on the
media and politicians who stray from official orthodoxy, and
intimidation via labeling, anathematizing , and ultimately loss of
livelihood.

Of course, there are other issues that fall into the same category of
"not fit for public discussion". Perhaps the main one is the role of
genetic influences on intelligence and behavior.

But the two issues of Israel and immigration relaxation (in the U.S.)
have in common a deep and straightforward Jewish commitment to
particular policies. My contention is that both policies have been
construed by Jewish leaders as being helpful to the security and
political influence of their community.

In the case of Israel, this is self-evident. In the case of
immigration policy, there ample documentation [PDF] of a consistent
interest by the Jewish community, both in America and in Europe, in
ending the hegemony of the host community amongst whom they live. The
measures taken to enforce their chosen objectives suggest there is
indeed an element of truth in what Foxman dismisses as "the old canard
and conspiracy theory of Jewish control of the media, Congress, and
the U.S. government".

I have presented the facts about Jewish influence in both reative
immigration and the Middle East elsewhere. This has been extremely
unwelcome. And it is not at all surprising that the Jewish community
would strenuously resist these conclusions.

Nevertheless, on foreign policy matters what is going on has obviously
become increasingly apparent to a lot of smart people with
intellectual integrity.

As the incoming 110th Congress starts up, a crucial question will be
if this new comprehension will dawn in an area in which, I believe, it
is even more critical: America's post-1965

Kevin MacDonald ] is Professor of Psychology at
California State University-Long Beach. For his website, go
tohttp://www.csulb.edu/~kmacd/

Excerpted from Mr. MacDonald's essay Immigration Policy: Is The Other
Boot About To Drop?

http://www.rense.com/general75/imm.htm


Why, oh why, does organized Jewry continue to push anti-White agendas
that will eventually consume their tribe?
gregory

Mustang is offering a pretty slick throwable device. It looks like one
of those old German grenades, with a long handle, and it inflates when
it hits the water.

They say it can be thrown farther and more accurately than a ring or
most other throwable devices

Unfortunately, the throw stick is now USCG approved, so if you carry
one you would still need to carry an "approved" device as well.

On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 00:06:24 GMT, "mcs" wrote:

Please cite names of Jewish organizations of influence who are opposed
to illegal immigration. Also name Jews of influence of the same
opinion.

Max


thats funny I heard the same exact argument from jews who were against
immigration. There are real conspiracies in the world by the way, and thats
where we different. Other religions who use their own religion to justify
hate and killings. Thats the point at which the world gets messed up

When people subscribe to drugs,
religious and racial inferiority or superiority to the point of constant
blame or refusing to accept others not like them by promoting hate and
killing and conspiracies , refusing to act loving as parents, and
rational as reasoning people, and constantly choose the same mistakes. Thats
the REAL CONSPIRACIES in the world


wrote in message
oups.com...
On Feb 4, 11:19 am, "Bill" wrote:
Jewish Organizations Behind Illegal Immigration Catastrophe

By Prof Kevin McDonald

2-2-7

As in the case of policy in the Middle East, it is no secret that
Jewish
organizations were at the forefront of the immigration policy shift
implemented by the 1965 Act. Consider the assessment of Vanderbilt
University historian Hugh Davis Graham in his book Collision Course:
The Strange Convergence of Affirmative Action and Immigration Policy
in America

"Most important for the content of immigration reform, the driving
force at the core of the movement, reaching back to the 1920s, were
Jewish organizations long active in opposing racial and ethnic quotas
Following the shock of the Holocaust, Jewish leaders had been
especially active in Washington in furthering immigration reform. To
the public, the most visible evidence of the immigration reform drive
was played by Jewish legislative leaders, such as Representative
Celler and Senator Jacob Javits of New York. Less visible, but equally
important, were the efforts of key advisers on presidential and agency
staffs. These included senior policy advisers such as Julius Edelson
and Harry Rosenfield in the Truman administration, Maxwell Rabb in the
Eisenhower White House, and presidential aide Myer Feldman, assistant
secretary of state Abba Schwartz, and deputy attorney general Norbert
Schlei in the Kennedy-Johnson administration."(pp. 56-57)

In the past year, there has been much discussion of illegal
immigration. It tapped into a very large reservoir of public anger
about the lack of control of our borders and, I think, the
transformations that immigration is unleashing. The fact that illegal
immigration is, after all, illegal made it difficult to keep off the
public radar (What part of illegal don't you understand??).

But this contrasts with almost no discussion at all in the Mainstream
Media of the question of the 1,000,000 or so legal immigrants that
come to the U.S. every year-no discussion of their effect on the
economy, social services, crime and competition at elite universities;
no discussion of their effect on the long term ethnic composition of
the U.S. and the displacement of native populations in various sectors
of the economy; and no discussion of whether most Americans really
want all of this. (They don't.) The fact that large scale legal
immigration causes exactly the same difficulties as large scale
illegal inflow is a non-subject.

Those who question the power and influence of the Israel Lobby are
quickly labeled anti-Semites. The terms of choice for anyone who
thinks the U.S. should have any restrictions at all on immigration are
" racist" and "nativist" .

It is exactly the same routine: Media self-censorship, pressure on the
media and politicians who stray from official orthodoxy, and
intimidation via labeling, anathematizing , and ultimately loss of
livelihood.

Of course, there are other issues that fall into the same category of
"not fit for public discussion". Perhaps the main one is the role of
genetic influences on intelligence and behavior.

But the two issues of Israel and immigration relaxation (in the U.S.)
have in common a deep and straightforward Jewish commitment to
particular policies. My contention is that both policies have been
construed by Jewish leaders as being helpful to the security and
political influence of their community.

In the case of Israel, this is self-evident. In the case of
immigration policy, there ample documentation [PDF] of a consistent
interest by the Jewish community, both in America and in Europe, in
ending the hegemony of the host community amongst whom they live. The
measures taken to enforce their chosen objectives suggest there is
indeed an element of truth in what Foxman dismisses as "the old canard
and conspiracy theory of Jewish control of the media, Congress, and
the U.S. government".

I have presented the facts about Jewish influence in both reative
immigration and the Middle East elsewhere. This has been extremely
unwelcome. And it is not at all surprising that the Jewish community
would strenuously resist these conclusions.

Nevertheless, on foreign policy matters what is going on has obviously
become increasingly apparent to a lot of smart people with
intellectual integrity.

As the incoming 110th Congress starts up, a crucial question will be
if this new comprehension will dawn in an area in which, I believe, it
is even more critical: America's post-1965

Kevin MacDonald ] is Professor of Psychology at
California State University-Long Beach. For his website, go
tohttp://www.csulb.edu/~kmacd/

Excerpted from Mr. MacDonald's essay Immigration Policy: Is The Other
Boot About To Drop?

http://www.rense.com/general75/imm.htm


Why, oh why, does organized Jewry continue to push anti-White agendas
that will eventually consume their tribe?
gregory

On Feb 4, 11:39 pm, "Chuck Gould" wrote:
Mustang is offering a pretty slick throwable device. It looks like one
of those old German grenades, with a long handle, and it inflates when
it hits the water.

How does it trigger to inflate?

"Tim" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Feb 4, 11:39 pm, "Chuck Gould" wrote:
Mustang is offering a pretty slick throwable device. It looks like one
of those old German grenades, with a long handle, and it inflates when
it hits the water.

How does it trigger to inflate?


Probably a water soluble pellet like the auto inflatable PFD.

On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 05:43:54 -0700, wrote:

On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 00:06:24 GMT, "mcs" wrote:

Please cite names of Jewish organizations of influence who are opposed
to illegal immigration. Also name Jews of influence of the same
opinion.

Please cite the Jews who are bosses at top American
industries. Why do I ask this? BECAUSE IT'S THOSE PEOPLE WHO WANT
ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION FOR THE PURPOSES OF DRIVING DOWN WAGE STANDARDS
YOU ****ING IDIOT.


Max


thats funny I heard the same exact argument from jews who were against
immigration. There are real conspiracies in the world by the way, and thats
where we different. Other religions who use their own religion to justify
hate and killings. Thats the point at which the world gets messed up

When people subscribe to drugs,
religious and racial inferiority or superiority to the point of constant
blame or refusing to accept others not like them by promoting hate and
killing and conspiracies , refusing to act loving as parents, and
rational as reasoning people, and constantly choose the same mistakes. Thats
the REAL CONSPIRACIES in the world


wrote in message
roups.com...
On Feb 4, 11:19 am, "Bill" wrote:
Jewish Organizations Behind Illegal Immigration Catastrophe

By Prof Kevin McDonald

2-2-7

As in the case of policy in the Middle East, it is no secret that
Jewish
organizations were at the forefront of the immigration policy shift
implemented by the 1965 Act. Consider the assessment of Vanderbilt
University historian Hugh Davis Graham in his book Collision Course:
The Strange Convergence of Affirmative Action and Immigration Policy
in America

"Most important for the content of immigration reform, the driving
force at the core of the movement, reaching back to the 1920s, were
Jewish organizations long active in opposing racial and ethnic quotas
Following the shock of the Holocaust, Jewish leaders had been
especially active in Washington in furthering immigration reform. To
the public, the most visible evidence of the immigration reform drive
was played by Jewish legislative leaders, such as Representative
Celler and Senator Jacob Javits of New York. Less visible, but equally
important, were the efforts of key advisers on presidential and agency
staffs. These included senior policy advisers such as Julius Edelson
and Harry Rosenfield in the Truman administration, Maxwell Rabb in the
Eisenhower White House, and presidential aide Myer Feldman, assistant
secretary of state Abba Schwartz, and deputy attorney general Norbert
Schlei in the Kennedy-Johnson administration."(pp. 56-57)

In the past year, there has been much discussion of illegal
immigration. It tapped into a very large reservoir of public anger
about the lack of control of our borders and, I think, the
transformations that immigration is unleashing. The fact that illegal
immigration is, after all, illegal made it difficult to keep off the
public radar (What part of illegal don't you understand??).

But this contrasts with almost no discussion at all in the Mainstream
Media of the question of the 1,000,000 or so legal immigrants that
come to the U.S. every year-no discussion of their effect on the
economy, social services, crime and competition at elite universities;
no discussion of their effect on the long term ethnic composition of
the U.S. and the displacement of native populations in various sectors
of the economy; and no discussion of whether most Americans really
want all of this. (They don't.) The fact that large scale legal
immigration causes exactly the same difficulties as large scale
illegal inflow is a non-subject.

Those who question the power and influence of the Israel Lobby are
quickly labeled anti-Semites. The terms of choice for anyone who
thinks the U.S. should have any restrictions at all on immigration are
" racist" and "nativist" .

It is exactly the same routine: Media self-censorship, pressure on the
media and politicians who stray from official orthodoxy, and
intimidation via labeling, anathematizing , and ultimately loss of
livelihood.

Of course, there are other issues that fall into the same category of
"not fit for public discussion". Perhaps the main one is the role of
genetic influences on intelligence and behavior.

But the two issues of Israel and immigration relaxation (in the U.S.)
have in common a deep and straightforward Jewish commitment to
particular policies. My contention is that both policies have been
construed by Jewish leaders as being helpful to the security and
political influence of their community.

In the case of Israel, this is self-evident. In the case of
immigration policy, there ample documentation [PDF] of a consistent
interest by the Jewish community, both in America and in Europe, in
ending the hegemony of the host community amongst whom they live. The
measures taken to enforce their chosen objectives suggest there is
indeed an element of truth in what Foxman dismisses as "the old canard
and conspiracy theory of Jewish control of the media, Congress, and
the U.S. government".

I have presented the facts about Jewish influence in both reative
immigration and the Middle East elsewhere. This has been extremely
unwelcome. And it is not at all surprising that the Jewish community
would strenuously resist these conclusions.

Nevertheless, on foreign policy matters what is going on has obviously
become increasingly apparent to a lot of smart people with
intellectual integrity.

As the incoming 110th Congress starts up, a crucial question will be
if this new comprehension will dawn in an area in which, I believe, it
is even more critical: America's post-1965

Kevin MacDonald ] is Professor of Psychology at
California State University-Long Beach. For his website, go
tohttp://www.csulb.edu/~kmacd/

Excerpted from Mr. MacDonald's essay Immigration Policy: Is The Other
Boot About To Drop?

http://www.rense.com/general75/imm.htm


Why, oh why, does organized Jewry continue to push anti-White agendas
that will eventually consume their tribe?
gregory

I wonder how many people don't know that buying the cheapest, single
ply TP you can find is often the exact same roll of stuff that you can
buy at the local marine supply store for about $3 a roll?

There's no plant that manufactures "marine toilet paper", but a bunch
of guys who repackage single ply and sell it at some incredible prices.

On Feb 6, 5:53?pm, Harry Krause wrote:
On 2/6/2007 8:50 PM, Chuck Gould wrote:

I wonder how many people don't know that buying the cheapest, single
ply TP you can find is often the exact same roll of stuff that you can
buy at the local marine supply store for about $3 a roll?

There's no plant that manufactures "marine toilet paper", but a bunch
of guys who repackage single ply and sell it at some incredible prices.

You don't use dry leaves?
Wussie.

Good grief, Harry. This is the Pacific NW. Who ever heard of a "dry"
leaf?