Bert Robbins wrote:

Don White wrote:

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..

Harry Krause wrote:

On 1/14/2007 1:56 PM, wrote:

On 13 Jan 2007 17:26:30 -0800, "Tim" wrote:

Could do like the religious snake oil salesman, "reverend Ike" did
back
in the late 70's.

he had a $30,000 a year salary and an unlimited expense acct.


That is the trick with owning a business. You always drive a company
vehicle, with a company gas card. You have a lot of business meals and
business trips. At a certain point you don't need much salary to live
fairly well.


Yep. Welfare for the wealthy.

If all you want to do a punch a clock 9-5 M-F then all you should
expect is a paycheck.


If only it were that simple.
Anyone in the civil service can tell you that cutback after cutback
has left most departments streatched to the limit with more & more
demands being placed on the '9-5 worker'.
At least that's the way it has evolved up here since the 80s.


It is that simple.

If you don't like what your employer pays your or demands of you then
you can quit and go work somewhere else or start your own business. If
you are not willing to change your situation then all you are doing is
punching a clock 9-5 M-F and you get what you get not what you want.



You are asking a socialist to understand personal responsibility????

"Animal05" wrote in message
...

You are asking a socialist to understand personal responsibility????


I challange you to accept personal responsibility to be an on topic poster
here and not a liability to the newsgroup.

Don White wrote:
"Animal05" wrote in message
...
You are asking a socialist to understand personal responsibility????


I challange you to accept personal responsibility to be an on topic poster
here and not a liability to the newsgroup.


HERE HERE. Excellent suggestion. I am glad to see you will not be
trolling for Off Topic fights. I am glad you have finally seen the light.

Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Don White wrote:

"Animal05" wrote in message
...

You are asking a socialist to understand personal responsibility????



I challange you to accept personal responsibility to be an on topic
poster here and not a liability to the newsgroup.

HERE HERE. Excellent suggestion. I am glad to see you will not be
trolling for Off Topic fights. I am glad you have finally seen the light.

Donnie whining about others doing what he is guilty of.

So predictable.

Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Don White wrote:
"Animal05" wrote in message
...
You are asking a socialist to understand personal responsibility????


I challange you to accept personal responsibility to be an on topic poster
here and not a liability to the newsgroup.


HERE HERE. Excellent suggestion. I am glad to see you will not be
trolling for Off Topic fights. I am glad you have finally seen the light.

Fantastic. But will you and your buddy also be committed to that
change by stopping your smarmy comments and trolls or are you both
exempt from the suggestion?

Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Don White wrote:
"Animal05" wrote in message
...
You are asking a socialist to understand personal responsibility????


I challange you to accept personal responsibility to be an on topic poster
here and not a liability to the newsgroup.


HERE HERE. Excellent suggestion. I am glad to see you will not be
trolling for Off Topic fights. I am glad you have finally seen the light.

I challenge you to accept personal responsibility to be an on topic
poster here and not a leability to the newsgroup.

basskisser wrote:
I challenge you to accept personal responsibility to be an on topic
poster here and not a leability to the newsgroup.

Yes, I imagine being a "leability" could be a bad thing.

Tim wrote:
basskisser wrote:
I challenge you to accept personal responsibility to be an on topic
poster here and not a leability to the newsgroup.

Yes, I imagine being a "leability" could be a bad thing.

Awe, how cute! Would you like me to point out each and every one of
your typos, too? You should really consider acting like an adult.

basskisser wrote:
Tim wrote:
basskisser wrote:
I challenge you to accept personal responsibility to be an on topic
poster here and not a leability to the newsgroup.

Yes, I imagine being a "leability" could be a bad thing.

Awe, how cute! Would you like me to point out each and every one of
your typos, too?

Many times you do. you accused me of not knowing how to type. Remember?
Maybe not.
But when typing "liability" the "I" is quite a ways away for "e"


You should really consider acting like an adult.

Take your own advice.

"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Tim wrote:
basskisser wrote:
I challenge you to accept personal responsibility to be an on topic
poster here and not a leability to the newsgroup.

Yes, I imagine being a "leability" could be a bad thing.

Awe, how cute! Would you like me to point out each and every one of
your typos, too? You should really consider acting like an adult.


Didn't you recently jump on someone here for their misspelling of a word?
If I recall the letter "'e" was used instead of the letter "u". When the
person claimed it was a typo you jumped on him saying that it wasn't as the
keys were not next to or near each other.

Last I checked the "e" and the "i" are separated by 4 other letters....even
more apart then "e" and "u".

So is yours a typo but the other guys was not one?

Just curious.