Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I wouldn't dispute that a monohull should right it's self after a roll and
be survivable. I think it takes a whole lot more to roll a cat of similar length than it does a monohull though. After all a 40' sailing cat is usually between 30' and 40' wide as well. "sherwindu" wrote in message ... Not too long ago, there was some lengthy discussion about the safety of monohulls vs. multihulls. What I heard was a lot of hype about monohulls going to the bottom when the roll over. Well, here is a recent story of Ken Barnes 360 degree roll off the coast of Chile where his monohull did not sink. In fact, when he was eventually picked up, his boat was still floating high in the water. True, he lost both masts, but he was in a position to either call for help, or jury rig some sails to try and reach port. I think if this had happened to a multihull, he would still be out there upside down, and maybe by some miracle he would have been able to get his EPIRB going and kept from freezing to death. So much for the myth that monohulls go to the bottom when they roll. Sherwin D. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A sea story, a reminder, and a parable (CAUTION: LONG) | Cruising | |||
Titanic show reminder. | Cruising | |||
A Reminder: A Reasonable Proposal | General | |||
A Reminder: A Reasonable Proposal | General | |||
A Reminder: A Reasonable Proposal | General |