Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
yea, but dino diesel is still much cheaper.
|
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Keith wrote: yea, but dino diesel is still much cheaper. Only if you measure "cost" strictly by the number of dollars you are hauling out of your wallet when you fill up. There are higher health, esthetic, and environmental "costs" associated with the use of fossil fuels than with renewable resources. I wouldn't want say that we have ever fought a "war for oil," but with worldwide demand for crude oil steadily increasing and the US currently importing the vast majority of the oil we need for daily consumption, that's a scenario that looms as a distinct possibiilty in the not-so-distant future. (Societies have fought wars over scarce resources for thousands of years). I'd hate to think that brave young men and women would ever have to die so that our country could secure a political or territorial foothold in one of the few remaining petroleum-rich nations. Transitioning to biodiesel and other renewable resources will forestall the day when I have to pump a couple of gallons of somebody's blood into my fuel tanks. Would I spend another $2 a gallon, for the rest of my life if I needed to, if I knew that my decision was "buying back" even a single life of even a total stranger that would otherwise be sacrificed? I'd like to think that I would. Would I spend another $3 a gallon, or $4, if I knew that such an expenditure would prevent thousands, tens of thousands, or hundreds of thousands of battlefield and collateral deaths? Once again, I'd like to think that I would. If we ever get to the point where we are spending 100's of billions of dollars on some future war fought primarily to secure a political or territorial foothold in an oil producing region, those costs would eventually have to be paid back to the federal treasury- by the first generation to come along with the nads to say "We will make sure that our government has adequate revenue to fund its spending" or the first generation to find itself so disastrously in debt to recently-Communist China that it has no choice. Taxes would need to be increased, (and that's a cash cost to everybody), or existing revenues increasingly diverted to debt service with a corresponding reduction in essential or useful services. If we ever got into a situation where we were fighting wars for oil, the defense costs would probably be several dollars per gallon of oil imported. Something to think about when considering the "cost" of diesel. I burn B20 in my boat. That's the only biodiesel blend available around here without schlepping the fuel down the dock in 5-gallon cans. Because I'm unwilling to run back and forth from the dock to a biodiesel producer with a couple of 5-gallon cans, I am in the same situation as most other people- doing a lot less than I potentially could to make the conversion to renewable resources. It's easier to talk the talk than to walk the walk, isn't it? (I would burn B50, B80, or maybe even B100 if it were available at the fuel dock). |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Just incase you missed it ie: Liberal news | ASA | |||
News from Lebanon | ASA | |||
Leave it to the Americans... | General | |||
Bush Resume | ASA | |||
(OT) And for the open minded clear thinkers | General |