On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 20:09:43 GMT, Don White wrote:

basskisser wrote:
JohnH wrote:

On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:55:14 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:


On 12/21/2006 7:12 AM, JohnH wrote:

On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:44:27 -0500, animal wrote:



Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension problem......insisting that
schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey requires being aged
in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never comprehend.

Same as last time, animal. Please don't agitate basskisser.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*


Facilitating again, eh?

Perhaps you can explain how a request to stop agitating is facilitating
anything other than the cessation of basskisser agitation.
--
****Happy Chanuka****

John H


Perhaps if YOU'd STFU.

better yet... he should directly take the offenders to task in a
meaningful way... not a 'wink, wink, nudge nudge... leave the poor kid
alone' routine.

How would you have it done, Don? A simple request isn't good enough, I take
it.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*

JohnH wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 20:09:43 GMT, Don White wrote:


basskisser wrote:

JohnH wrote:


On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:55:14 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:



On 12/21/2006 7:12 AM, JohnH wrote:


On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:44:27 -0500, animal wrote:




Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension problem......insisting that
schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey requires being aged
in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never comprehend.

Same as last time, animal. Please don't agitate basskisser.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*


Facilitating again, eh?

Perhaps you can explain how a request to stop agitating is facilitating
anything other than the cessation of basskisser agitation.
--
****Happy Chanuka****

John H


Perhaps if YOU'd STFU.


better yet... he should directly take the offenders to task in a
meaningful way... not a 'wink, wink, nudge nudge... leave the poor kid
alone' routine.


How would you have it done, Don? A simple request isn't good enough, I take
it.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*

Talk to the Dans, the Calif Bills, the Jack Goffs etc like you talk to
me, Harry or Basskisser. That should do it.

On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 21:09:30 GMT, Don White wrote:

JohnH wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 20:09:43 GMT, Don White wrote:


basskisser wrote:

JohnH wrote:


On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:55:14 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:



On 12/21/2006 7:12 AM, JohnH wrote:


On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:44:27 -0500, animal wrote:




Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension problem......insisting that
schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey requires being aged
in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never comprehend.

Same as last time, animal. Please don't agitate basskisser.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*


Facilitating again, eh?

Perhaps you can explain how a request to stop agitating is facilitating
anything other than the cessation of basskisser agitation.
--
****Happy Chanuka****

John H


Perhaps if YOU'd STFU.


better yet... he should directly take the offenders to task in a
meaningful way... not a 'wink, wink, nudge nudge... leave the poor kid
alone' routine.


How would you have it done, Don? A simple request isn't good enough, I take
it.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*

Talk to the Dans, the Calif Bills, the Jack Goffs etc like you talk to
me, Harry or Basskisser. That should do it.

The problem with that idea is that they haven't called me any names lately
and they don't puppy-dog each other.

But, if you'll provide me with an example, I'll do my best. Have I said
something offensive to you or Harry lately? Gosh, I hope not.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*

"Don White" wrote in message
...
JohnH wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 20:09:43 GMT, Don White
wrote:


basskisser wrote:

JohnH wrote:


On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:55:14 -0500, Harry Krause

wrote:



On 12/21/2006 7:12 AM, JohnH wrote:


On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:44:27 -0500, animal
wrote:




Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension problem......insisting
that
schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey requires being
aged
in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never comprehend.

Same as last time, animal. Please don't agitate basskisser.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*


Facilitating again, eh?

Perhaps you can explain how a request to stop agitating is facilitating
anything other than the cessation of basskisser agitation.
--
****Happy Chanuka****

John H


Perhaps if YOU'd STFU.


better yet... he should directly take the offenders to task in a
meaningful way... not a 'wink, wink, nudge nudge... leave the poor kid
alone' routine.


How would you have it done, Don? A simple request isn't good enough, I
take
it.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*

Talk to the Dans, the Calif Bills, the Jack Goffs etc like you talk to me,
Harry or Basskisser. That should do it.

You must have been one of those government employee's everybody talks about.
Incompetent. Can not even read. John does try to control me and the Dan's.
But we are semi-uncontrollable. Only SWBO can control.

Calif Bill wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message
...

JohnH wrote:

On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 20:09:43 GMT, Don White
wrote:



basskisser wrote:


JohnH wrote:



On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:55:14 -0500, Harry Krause

wrote:




On 12/21/2006 7:12 AM, JohnH wrote:



On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:44:27 -0500, animal
wrote:





Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension problem......insisting
that
schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey requires being
aged
in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never comprehend.

Same as last time, animal. Please don't agitate basskisser.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*


Facilitating again, eh?

Perhaps you can explain how a request to stop agitating is facilitating
anything other than the cessation of basskisser agitation.
--
****Happy Chanuka****

John H


Perhaps if YOU'd STFU.


better yet... he should directly take the offenders to task in a
meaningful way... not a 'wink, wink, nudge nudge... leave the poor kid
alone' routine.


How would you have it done, Don? A simple request isn't good enough, I
take
it.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*

Talk to the Dans, the Calif Bills, the Jack Goffs etc like you talk to me,
Harry or Basskisser. That should do it.


You must have been one of those government employee's everybody talks about.
Incompetent. Can not even read. John does try to control me and the Dan's.
But we are semi-uncontrollable. Only *SWBO* can control.


This former 'Crown Corporation' employee would guess that you must mean
*SWMBO*.
You probably failed the qualification test for civil servant jobs.

"Don White" wrote in message
...
Calif Bill wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message
...

JohnH wrote:

On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 20:09:43 GMT, Don White
wrote:



basskisser wrote:


JohnH wrote:



On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:55:14 -0500, Harry Krause

wrote:




On 12/21/2006 7:12 AM, JohnH wrote:



On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:44:27 -0500, animal
wrote:





Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension problem......insisting
that
schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey requires being
aged
in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never comprehend.

Same as last time, animal. Please don't agitate basskisser.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*


Facilitating again, eh?

Perhaps you can explain how a request to stop agitating is
facilitating
anything other than the cessation of basskisser agitation.
--
****Happy Chanuka****

John H


Perhaps if YOU'd STFU.


better yet... he should directly take the offenders to task in a
meaningful way... not a 'wink, wink, nudge nudge... leave the poor kid
alone' routine.


How would you have it done, Don? A simple request isn't good enough, I
take
it.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*

Talk to the Dans, the Calif Bills, the Jack Goffs etc like you talk to
me, Harry or Basskisser. That should do it.


You must have been one of those government employee's everybody talks
about. Incompetent. Can not even read. John does try to control me and
the Dan's. But we are semi-uncontrollable. Only *SWBO* can control.
This former 'Crown Corporation' employee would guess that you must mean
*SWMBO*.
You probably failed the qualification test for civil servant jobs.

Never took the test. Went to work in the high tech computer world when I
was 19, and company paid for my degree. Then spent a lot of years in the
high paid Silicon Valley. So I get to have a nice truck, nice house, and
nice boat.

Calif Bill wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message
...
JohnH wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 20:09:43 GMT, Don White
wrote:


basskisser wrote:

JohnH wrote:


On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:55:14 -0500, Harry Krause

wrote:



On 12/21/2006 7:12 AM, JohnH wrote:


On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:44:27 -0500, animal
wrote:




Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension problem......insisting
that
schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey requires being
aged
in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never comprehend.

Same as last time, animal. Please don't agitate basskisser.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*


Facilitating again, eh?

Perhaps you can explain how a request to stop agitating is facilitating
anything other than the cessation of basskisser agitation.
--
****Happy Chanuka****

John H


Perhaps if YOU'd STFU.


better yet... he should directly take the offenders to task in a
meaningful way... not a 'wink, wink, nudge nudge... leave the poor kid
alone' routine.


How would you have it done, Don? A simple request isn't good enough, I
take
it.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*

Talk to the Dans, the Calif Bills, the Jack Goffs etc like you talk to me,
Harry or Basskisser. That should do it.

You must have been one of those government employee's everybody talks about.
Incompetent. Can not even read. John does try to control me and the Dan's.
But we are semi-uncontrollable. Only SWBO can control.

BWAAAHAAAA!!!! And John just said that you guys don't "puppy dog" each
other!!!! Were you a government employee, Bill? What about THIS
sentence:
John does try to control me and the Dan's.

basskisser wrote:

Calif Bill wrote:

"Don White" wrote in message
...

JohnH wrote:

On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 20:09:43 GMT, Don White
wrote:



basskisser wrote:


JohnH wrote:



On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:55:14 -0500, Harry Krause

wrote:




On 12/21/2006 7:12 AM, JohnH wrote:



On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:44:27 -0500, animal
wrote:





Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension problem......insisting
that
schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey requires being
aged
in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never comprehend.

Same as last time, animal. Please don't agitate basskisser.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*


Facilitating again, eh?

Perhaps you can explain how a request to stop agitating is facilitating
anything other than the cessation of basskisser agitation.
--
****Happy Chanuka****

John H


Perhaps if YOU'd STFU.


better yet... he should directly take the offenders to task in a
meaningful way... not a 'wink, wink, nudge nudge... leave the poor kid
alone' routine.


How would you have it done, Don? A simple request isn't good enough, I
take
it.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*

Talk to the Dans, the Calif Bills, the Jack Goffs etc like you talk to me,
Harry or Basskisser. That should do it.

You must have been one of those government employee's everybody talks about.
Incompetent. Can not even read. John does try to control me and the Dan's.
But we are semi-uncontrollable. Only SWBO can control.


BWAAAHAAAA!!!! And John just said that you guys don't "puppy dog" each
other!!!! Were you a government employee, Bill? What about THIS
sentence:
John does try to control me and the Dan's.


First - "BWAAAA!!" does nothing for your credibility - or anything else
you post with more than one exclamation point. It makes you appear like
a younger child than you are.

Second - The rest of your paragraph is a disaster. Are you so wound up
that you can't control yourself long enough to get your point across in
two different statements?


--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Dan wrote:
basskisser wrote:

Calif Bill wrote:

"Don White" wrote in message
...

JohnH wrote:

On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 20:09:43 GMT, Don White
wrote:



basskisser wrote:


JohnH wrote:



On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:55:14 -0500, Harry Krause

wrote:




On 12/21/2006 7:12 AM, JohnH wrote:



On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:44:27 -0500, animal
wrote:





Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension problem......insisting
that
schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey requires being
aged
in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never comprehend.

Same as last time, animal. Please don't agitate basskisser.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*


Facilitating again, eh?

Perhaps you can explain how a request to stop agitating is facilitating
anything other than the cessation of basskisser agitation.
--
****Happy Chanuka****

John H


Perhaps if YOU'd STFU.


better yet... he should directly take the offenders to task in a
meaningful way... not a 'wink, wink, nudge nudge... leave the poor kid
alone' routine.


How would you have it done, Don? A simple request isn't good enough, I
take
it.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*

Talk to the Dans, the Calif Bills, the Jack Goffs etc like you talk to me,
Harry or Basskisser. That should do it.

You must have been one of those government employee's everybody talks about.
Incompetent. Can not even read. John does try to control me and the Dan's.
But we are semi-uncontrollable. Only SWBO can control.


BWAAAHAAAA!!!! And John just said that you guys don't "puppy dog" each
other!!!! Were you a government employee, Bill? What about THIS
sentence:
John does try to control me and the Dan's.


First - "BWAAAA!!" does nothing for your credibility - or anything else
you post with more than one exclamation point. It makes you appear like
a younger child than you are.

Second - The rest of your paragraph is a disaster. Are you so wound up
that you can't control yourself long enough to get your point across in
two different statements?


Awe.....how cute! I apparently got my point across quite well, Ms.
Grammer.

basskisser wrote:

Dan wrote:

basskisser wrote:


Calif Bill wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
...


JohnH wrote:


On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 20:09:43 GMT, Don White
wrote:




basskisser wrote:



JohnH wrote:




On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:55:14 -0500, Harry Krause

wrote:





On 12/21/2006 7:12 AM, JohnH wrote:




On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:44:27 -0500, animal
wrote:






Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension problem......insisting
that
schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey requires being
aged
in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never comprehend.

Same as last time, animal. Please don't agitate basskisser.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*


Facilitating again, eh?

Perhaps you can explain how a request to stop agitating is facilitating
anything other than the cessation of basskisser agitation.
--
****Happy Chanuka****

John H


Perhaps if YOU'd STFU.


better yet... he should directly take the offenders to task in a
meaningful way... not a 'wink, wink, nudge nudge... leave the poor kid
alone' routine.


How would you have it done, Don? A simple request isn't good enough, I
take
it.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*

Talk to the Dans, the Calif Bills, the Jack Goffs etc like you talk to me,
Harry or Basskisser. That should do it.

You must have been one of those government employee's everybody talks about.
Incompetent. Can not even read. John does try to control me and the Dan's.
But we are semi-uncontrollable. Only SWBO can control.


BWAAAHAAAA!!!! And John just said that you guys don't "puppy dog" each
other!!!! Were you a government employee, Bill? What about THIS
sentence:
John does try to control me and the Dan's.


First - "BWAAAA!!" does nothing for your credibility - or anything else
you post with more than one exclamation point. It makes you appear like
a younger child than you are.

Second - The rest of your paragraph is a disaster. Are you so wound up
that you can't control yourself long enough to get your point across in
two different statements?



Awe.....how cute! I apparently got my point across quite well, Ms.
Grammer.


Sad, but typical response.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com