"Sam" wrote in message news:xGcih.2598$Jb6.2333@trnddc03...


prove it wrong. I've asked you to do so several times......
still waiting........


Ok, we'll start off easy.

Question #1 (Yes or No only)

The return line of an A/C system is the lower pressure side of the system.


Is this question too complicated for you?

basskisser wrote:

Dan wrote:

basskisser wrote:


Dan wrote:


basskisser wrote:



Dan wrote:



basskisser wrote:




Dan wrote:





Sure you did. If that's true and your "friend" read your posts, he is
as pathetic as you. Seriously.


Pathetic because we shared a huge laugh at your expense?

Infatuation......
Infatuation.....
It's driving Dan crazy....
It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY.......



Uhhhh...yeah. That would be extremly pathetic to any reasonable person.

--

I guess you are right. Anybody that would give a mentally ill stalker
like you a second glance would be pathetic.


Read it again - slower this time. Have an adult help you and you might
get it. Then again...

--

Every single post I make, there you are, my cute little stalker......
Infatuation......
Infatuation......


Please define "every" in your sentence and be as specific as possible.


eve·ry /ˈɛvri/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled
Pronunciation[ev-ree] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–adjective 1. being one of a group or series taken collectively;
each: We go there every day.
2. all possible; the greatest possible degree of: every prospect of
success.
—Idioms3. every bit, in every respect; completely: This is every bit
as good as she says it is.
4. every now and then, on occasion; from time to time: She bakes her
own bread every now and then. Also, every once in a while, every so
often.
5. every other, every second; every alternate: milk deliveries every
other day.
6. every which way, in all directions; in disorganized fashion: I
brushed against the table, and the cards fell every which way.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Origin: 1125–75; ME every, everich, OE ǣfre ǣlc ever each]


—Synonyms 1. See each.

Infatuation.......
Infatuation.......
It's driving Dan crazy.......
It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY.......


That should work. Thanks.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Duke Nukem wrote:

On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 07:28:56 -0500, animal
wrote:


Schnapps = whiskey,


I was always under the impression that schnapps is the generic term
for clear brandies distilled from fermented fruits.

Brandy is made from grape wine and some is made from the fermented
juices of fruits other than grapes. It's a post fermentation process.

Single malt whiskey is made from malted barley, with no other grain
products or other fermentables. Blended whiskeys are self
explanatory.

So with that in mind, how is schnapps whiskey?

Or am I late to the party?

Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension problem......insisting that
schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey requires being aged
in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never comprehend.

On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:44:27 -0500, animal wrote:


Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension problem......insisting that
schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey requires being aged
in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never comprehend.

Same as last time, animal. Please don't agitate basskisser.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*

On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:55:14 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

On 12/21/2006 7:12 AM, JohnH wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:44:27 -0500, animal wrote:


Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension problem......insisting that
schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey requires being aged
in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never comprehend.

Same as last time, animal. Please don't agitate basskisser.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*


Facilitating again, eh?

Perhaps you can explain how a request to stop agitating is facilitating
anything other than the cessation of basskisser agitation.
--
****Happy Chanuka****

John H

JohnH wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:55:14 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

On 12/21/2006 7:12 AM, JohnH wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:44:27 -0500, animal wrote:


Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension problem......insisting that
schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey requires being aged
in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never comprehend.

Same as last time, animal. Please don't agitate basskisser.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*


Facilitating again, eh?

Perhaps you can explain how a request to stop agitating is facilitating
anything other than the cessation of basskisser agitation.
--
****Happy Chanuka****

John H

Perhaps if YOU'd STFU.

basskisser wrote:
JohnH wrote:

On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:55:14 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:


On 12/21/2006 7:12 AM, JohnH wrote:

On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:44:27 -0500, animal wrote:



Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension problem......insisting that
schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey requires being aged
in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never comprehend.

Same as last time, animal. Please don't agitate basskisser.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*


Facilitating again, eh?

Perhaps you can explain how a request to stop agitating is facilitating
anything other than the cessation of basskisser agitation.
--
****Happy Chanuka****

John H


Perhaps if YOU'd STFU.

better yet... he should directly take the offenders to task in a
meaningful way... not a 'wink, wink, nudge nudge... leave the poor kid
alone' routine.

On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 20:09:43 GMT, Don White wrote:

basskisser wrote:
JohnH wrote:

On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:55:14 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:


On 12/21/2006 7:12 AM, JohnH wrote:

On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:44:27 -0500, animal wrote:



Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension problem......insisting that
schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey requires being aged
in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never comprehend.

Same as last time, animal. Please don't agitate basskisser.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*


Facilitating again, eh?

Perhaps you can explain how a request to stop agitating is facilitating
anything other than the cessation of basskisser agitation.
--
****Happy Chanuka****

John H


Perhaps if YOU'd STFU.

better yet... he should directly take the offenders to task in a
meaningful way... not a 'wink, wink, nudge nudge... leave the poor kid
alone' routine.

How would you have it done, Don? A simple request isn't good enough, I take
it.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*

Don White wrote:
basskisser wrote:
JohnH wrote:

On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:55:14 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:


On 12/21/2006 7:12 AM, JohnH wrote:

On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:44:27 -0500, animal wrote:



Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension problem......insisting that
schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey requires being aged
in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never comprehend.

Same as last time, animal. Please don't agitate basskisser.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*


Facilitating again, eh?

Perhaps you can explain how a request to stop agitating is facilitating
anything other than the cessation of basskisser agitation.
--
****Happy Chanuka****

John H


Perhaps if YOU'd STFU.

better yet... he should directly take the offenders to task in a
meaningful way... not a 'wink, wink, nudge nudge... leave the poor kid
alone' routine.

He's stirring the pot, just trying to cause trouble, while ACTING like
he is trying to better the newsgroup. Reggie = JohnH.

JohnH wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 20:09:43 GMT, Don White wrote:


basskisser wrote:

JohnH wrote:


On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:55:14 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:



On 12/21/2006 7:12 AM, JohnH wrote:


On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:44:27 -0500, animal wrote:




Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension problem......insisting that
schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey requires being aged
in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never comprehend.

Same as last time, animal. Please don't agitate basskisser.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*


Facilitating again, eh?

Perhaps you can explain how a request to stop agitating is facilitating
anything other than the cessation of basskisser agitation.
--
****Happy Chanuka****

John H


Perhaps if YOU'd STFU.


better yet... he should directly take the offenders to task in a
meaningful way... not a 'wink, wink, nudge nudge... leave the poor kid
alone' routine.


How would you have it done, Don? A simple request isn't good enough, I take
it.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*

Talk to the Dans, the Calif Bills, the Jack Goffs etc like you talk to
me, Harry or Basskisser. That should do it.