JohnH wrote:

On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 19:35:10 -0500, Dan
wrote:


basskisser wrote:


Dan wrote:


basskisser wrote:



Calif Bill wrote:



"Don White" wrote in message
...



JohnH wrote:



On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 20:09:43 GMT, Don White
wrote:





basskisser wrote:




JohnH wrote:





On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:55:14 -0500, Harry Krause

wrote:






On 12/21/2006 7:12 AM, JohnH wrote:





On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:44:27 -0500, animal
wrote:







Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension problem......insisting
that
schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey requires being
aged
in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never comprehend.

Same as last time, animal. Please don't agitate basskisser.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*


Facilitating again, eh?

Perhaps you can explain how a request to stop agitating is facilitating
anything other than the cessation of basskisser agitation.
--
****Happy Chanuka****

John H


Perhaps if YOU'd STFU.


better yet... he should directly take the offenders to task in a
meaningful way... not a 'wink, wink, nudge nudge... leave the poor kid
alone' routine.


How would you have it done, Don? A simple request isn't good enough, I
take
it.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*

Talk to the Dans, the Calif Bills, the Jack Goffs etc like you talk to me,
Harry or Basskisser. That should do it.

You must have been one of those government employee's everybody talks about.
Incompetent. Can not even read. John does try to control me and the Dan's.
But we are semi-uncontrollable. Only SWBO can control.


BWAAAHAAAA!!!! And John just said that you guys don't "puppy dog" each
other!!!! Were you a government employee, Bill? What about THIS
sentence:
John does try to control me and the Dan's.


First - "BWAAAA!!" does nothing for your credibility - or anything else
you post with more than one exclamation point. It makes you appear like
a younger child than you are.

Second - The rest of your paragraph is a disaster. Are you so wound up
that you can't control yourself long enough to get your point across in
two different statements?



Awe.....how cute! I apparently got my point across quite well, Ms.
Grammer.


Sad, but typical response.


Dan, have I asked you nicely to please stop agitating basskisser? It would
please almost everyone in the group to no end.

Thanks!
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*

Give it a rest, John. Since you already know "basskisser" is the
problem, respond to him.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 19:39:44 -0500, Dan
wrote:



Give it a rest, John. Since you already know "basskisser" is the
problem, respond to him.

It takes two, Dan.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*

On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 22:52:21 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

On 12/25/2006 10:19 PM, JohnH wrote:
On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 19:39:44 -0500, Dan
wrote:


Give it a rest, John. Since you already know "basskisser" is the
problem, respond to him.

It takes two, Dan.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*

four or more. You and Reggie are part of this particular problem.
All birds of a feather.

Wrong again, Harry!

You've not been having good days lately. Your assumptions are wrong, and
your name-calling is reflecting a crappy disposition. Next year you should
try getting into the Christmas spirit.

Hope you have a great New Year!
--
John

Dan wrote:
JohnH wrote:

On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 19:35:10 -0500, Dan
wrote:


basskisser wrote:


Dan wrote:


basskisser wrote:



Calif Bill wrote:



"Don White" wrote in message
...



JohnH wrote:



On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 20:09:43 GMT, Don White
wrote:





basskisser wrote:




JohnH wrote:





On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:55:14 -0500, Harry Krause

wrote:






On 12/21/2006 7:12 AM, JohnH wrote:





On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:44:27 -0500, animal
wrote:







Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension problem......insisting
that
schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey requires being
aged
in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never comprehend.

Same as last time, animal. Please don't agitate basskisser.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*


Facilitating again, eh?

Perhaps you can explain how a request to stop agitating is facilitating
anything other than the cessation of basskisser agitation.
--
****Happy Chanuka****

John H


Perhaps if YOU'd STFU.


better yet... he should directly take the offenders to task in a
meaningful way... not a 'wink, wink, nudge nudge... leave the poor kid
alone' routine.


How would you have it done, Don? A simple request isn't good enough, I
take
it.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*

Talk to the Dans, the Calif Bills, the Jack Goffs etc like you talk to me,
Harry or Basskisser. That should do it.

You must have been one of those government employee's everybody talks about.
Incompetent. Can not even read. John does try to control me and the Dan's.
But we are semi-uncontrollable. Only SWBO can control.


BWAAAHAAAA!!!! And John just said that you guys don't "puppy dog" each
other!!!! Were you a government employee, Bill? What about THIS
sentence:
John does try to control me and the Dan's.


First - "BWAAAA!!" does nothing for your credibility - or anything else
you post with more than one exclamation point. It makes you appear like
a younger child than you are.

Second - The rest of your paragraph is a disaster. Are you so wound up
that you can't control yourself long enough to get your point across in
two different statements?



Awe.....how cute! I apparently got my point across quite well, Ms.
Grammer.


Sad, but typical response.


Dan, have I asked you nicely to please stop agitating basskisser? It would
please almost everyone in the group to no end.

Thanks!
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*

Give it a rest, John. Since you already know "basskisser" is the
problem, respond to him.

--
I'm the problem? You follow me like a little school girl to every post
and reply I make, and that's MY fault???

Infatuation.......
Infatuation......
It's driving Dan crazy......
It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY......

basskisser wrote:

Dan wrote:

JohnH wrote:


On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 19:35:10 -0500, Dan
wrote:



basskisser wrote:



Dan wrote:



basskisser wrote:




Calif Bill wrote:




"Don White" wrote in message
...




JohnH wrote:




On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 20:09:43 GMT, Don White
wrote:






basskisser wrote:





JohnH wrote:






On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:55:14 -0500, Harry Krause

wrote:







On 12/21/2006 7:12 AM, JohnH wrote:






On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:44:27 -0500, animal
wrote:








Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension problem......insisting
that
schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey requires being
aged
in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never comprehend.

Same as last time, animal. Please don't agitate basskisser.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*


Facilitating again, eh?

Perhaps you can explain how a request to stop agitating is facilitating
anything other than the cessation of basskisser agitation.
--
****Happy Chanuka****

John H


Perhaps if YOU'd STFU.


better yet... he should directly take the offenders to task in a
meaningful way... not a 'wink, wink, nudge nudge... leave the poor kid
alone' routine.


How would you have it done, Don? A simple request isn't good enough, I
take
it.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*

Talk to the Dans, the Calif Bills, the Jack Goffs etc like you talk to me,
Harry or Basskisser. That should do it.

You must have been one of those government employee's everybody talks about.
Incompetent. Can not even read. John does try to control me and the Dan's.
But we are semi-uncontrollable. Only SWBO can control.


BWAAAHAAAA!!!! And John just said that you guys don't "puppy dog" each
other!!!! Were you a government employee, Bill? What about THIS
sentence:
John does try to control me and the Dan's.


First - "BWAAAA!!" does nothing for your credibility - or anything else
you post with more than one exclamation point. It makes you appear like
a younger child than you are.

Second - The rest of your paragraph is a disaster. Are you so wound up
that you can't control yourself long enough to get your point across in
two different statements?



Awe.....how cute! I apparently got my point across quite well, Ms.
Grammer.


Sad, but typical response.


Dan, have I asked you nicely to please stop agitating basskisser? It would
please almost everyone in the group to no end.

Thanks!
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*

Give it a rest, John. Since you already know "basskisser" is the
problem, respond to him.

--

I'm the problem? You follow me like a little school girl to every post
and reply I make, and that's MY fault???

Infatuation.......
Infatuation......
It's driving Dan crazy......
It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY......


I don't "follow" you anywhere, nutjob. And "every" post? Where did you
go to school? Did they teach you the meaning of the word "every"?
Guess not or you missed that day. Keep trolling, boy.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

JohnH wrote:

On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 19:39:44 -0500, Dan
wrote:



Give it a rest, John. Since you already know "basskisser" is the
problem, respond to him.


It takes two, Dan.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*

No, John, it takes one lunatic and a half dozen people who are trolled
by the lunatic with attacks approaching libel.

Consider your "neat guy" replies to Harry. How is that any different?

It's not. Just a different lunatic and, coincidentally, they are
newsgroup buddies!

Get it now?

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

"Dan" wrote in message
.. .
JohnH wrote:

On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 19:39:44 -0500, Dan
wrote:



Give it a rest, John. Since you already know "basskisser" is the
problem, respond to him.


It takes two, Dan.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*

No, John, it takes one lunatic and a half dozen people who are trolled by
the lunatic with attacks approaching libel.

Consider your "neat guy" replies to Harry. How is that any different?

It's not.

Dan, it is just another of our sheriffs doing the 'do as I say, not as I do'
routine.

Dan wrote:

basskisser wrote:

Dan wrote:

JohnH wrote:


On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 19:35:10 -0500, Dan
wrote:



basskisser wrote:



Dan wrote:



basskisser wrote:




Calif Bill wrote:




"Don White" wrote in message
...




JohnH wrote:




On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 20:09:43 GMT, Don White

wrote:






basskisser wrote:





JohnH wrote:






On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:55:14 -0500, Harry Krause

wrote:







On 12/21/2006 7:12 AM, JohnH wrote:






On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:44:27 -0500, animal

wrote:








Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension
problem......insisting
that
schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey
requires being
aged
in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never
comprehend.


Same as last time, animal. Please don't agitate basskisser.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*



Facilitating again, eh?


Perhaps you can explain how a request to stop agitating is
facilitating
anything other than the cessation of basskisser agitation.
--
****Happy Chanuka****

John H



Perhaps if YOU'd STFU.


better yet... he should directly take the offenders to task
in a
meaningful way... not a 'wink, wink, nudge nudge... leave
the poor kid
alone' routine.



How would you have it done, Don? A simple request isn't good
enough, I
take
it.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*


Talk to the Dans, the Calif Bills, the Jack Goffs etc like you
talk to me,
Harry or Basskisser. That should do it.


You must have been one of those government employee's everybody
talks about.
Incompetent. Can not even read. John does try to control me
and the Dan's.
But we are semi-uncontrollable. Only SWBO can control.



BWAAAHAAAA!!!! And John just said that you guys don't "puppy
dog" each
other!!!! Were you a government employee, Bill? What about THIS
sentence:
John does try to control me and the Dan's.


First - "BWAAAA!!" does nothing for your credibility - or
anything else
you post with more than one exclamation point. It makes you
appear like
a younger child than you are.

Second - The rest of your paragraph is a disaster. Are you so
wound up
that you can't control yourself long enough to get your point
across in
two different statements?



Awe.....how cute! I apparently got my point across quite well, Ms.
Grammer.


Sad, but typical response.



Dan, have I asked you nicely to please stop agitating basskisser? It
would
please almost everyone in the group to no end.

Thanks!
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*


Give it a rest, John. Since you already know "basskisser" is the
problem, respond to him.

--


I'm the problem? You follow me like a little school girl to every post
and reply I make, and that's MY fault???

Infatuation.......
Infatuation......
It's driving Dan crazy......
It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY......


I don't "follow" you anywhere, nutjob. And "every" post? Where did you
go to school?

Where ever the short bus took him.

Did they teach you the meaning of the word "every"?

They were too busy trying to teach him not to lick the windows.

Guess
not or you missed that day. Keep trolling, boy.

Dan wrote:
basskisser wrote:

Dan wrote:

JohnH wrote:


On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 19:35:10 -0500, Dan
wrote:



basskisser wrote:



Dan wrote:



basskisser wrote:




Calif Bill wrote:




"Don White" wrote in message
...




JohnH wrote:




On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 20:09:43 GMT, Don White
wrote:






basskisser wrote:





JohnH wrote:






On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:55:14 -0500, Harry Krause

wrote:







On 12/21/2006 7:12 AM, JohnH wrote:






On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:44:27 -0500, animal
wrote:








Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension problem......insisting
that
schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey requires being
aged
in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never comprehend.

Same as last time, animal. Please don't agitate basskisser.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*


Facilitating again, eh?

Perhaps you can explain how a request to stop agitating is facilitating
anything other than the cessation of basskisser agitation.
--
****Happy Chanuka****

John H


Perhaps if YOU'd STFU.


better yet... he should directly take the offenders to task in a
meaningful way... not a 'wink, wink, nudge nudge... leave the poor kid
alone' routine.


How would you have it done, Don? A simple request isn't good enough, I
take
it.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*

Talk to the Dans, the Calif Bills, the Jack Goffs etc like you talk to me,
Harry or Basskisser. That should do it.

You must have been one of those government employee's everybody talks about.
Incompetent. Can not even read. John does try to control me and the Dan's.
But we are semi-uncontrollable. Only SWBO can control.


BWAAAHAAAA!!!! And John just said that you guys don't "puppy dog" each
other!!!! Were you a government employee, Bill? What about THIS
sentence:
John does try to control me and the Dan's.


First - "BWAAAA!!" does nothing for your credibility - or anything else
you post with more than one exclamation point. It makes you appear like
a younger child than you are.

Second - The rest of your paragraph is a disaster. Are you so wound up
that you can't control yourself long enough to get your point across in
two different statements?



Awe.....how cute! I apparently got my point across quite well, Ms.
Grammer.


Sad, but typical response.


Dan, have I asked you nicely to please stop agitating basskisser? It would
please almost everyone in the group to no end.

Thanks!
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*

Give it a rest, John. Since you already know "basskisser" is the
problem, respond to him.

--

I'm the problem? You follow me like a little school girl to every post
and reply I make, and that's MY fault???

Infatuation.......
Infatuation......
It's driving Dan crazy......
It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY......


I don't "follow" you anywhere, nutjob. And "every" post? Where did you
go to school? Did they teach you the meaning of the word "every"?
Guess not or you missed that day. Keep trolling, boy.

Awe, your once again resorting to childish and petty name calling, how
cute!

Show me one thread in the last month that you haven't followed me to.

Infatuation......
Infatuation.....
It's driving Dan crazy....
It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY....

Dan wrote:
JohnH wrote:

On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 19:39:44 -0500, Dan
wrote:



Give it a rest, John. Since you already know "basskisser" is the
problem, respond to him.


It takes two, Dan.
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*

No, John, it takes one lunatic and a half dozen people who are trolled
by the lunatic with attacks approaching libel.

Cite?

Consider your "neat guy" replies to Harry. How is that any different?

It's not. Just a different lunatic and, coincidentally, they are
newsgroup buddies!

Get it now?

*I* get it, and have for some time. You are a stalker, and your
infatuation with me DOES border on lunacy.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com