|
Wanted: Large Boat
JohnH wrote:
On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 19:35:10 -0500, Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "Don White" wrote in message ... JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 20:09:43 GMT, Don White wrote: basskisser wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:55:14 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: On 12/21/2006 7:12 AM, JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:44:27 -0500, animal wrote: Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension problem......insisting that schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey requires being aged in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never comprehend. Same as last time, animal. Please don't agitate basskisser. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Facilitating again, eh? Perhaps you can explain how a request to stop agitating is facilitating anything other than the cessation of basskisser agitation. -- ****Happy Chanuka**** John H Perhaps if YOU'd STFU. better yet... he should directly take the offenders to task in a meaningful way... not a 'wink, wink, nudge nudge... leave the poor kid alone' routine. How would you have it done, Don? A simple request isn't good enough, I take it. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Talk to the Dans, the Calif Bills, the Jack Goffs etc like you talk to me, Harry or Basskisser. That should do it. You must have been one of those government employee's everybody talks about. Incompetent. Can not even read. John does try to control me and the Dan's. But we are semi-uncontrollable. Only SWBO can control. BWAAAHAAAA!!!! And John just said that you guys don't "puppy dog" each other!!!! Were you a government employee, Bill? What about THIS sentence: John does try to control me and the Dan's. First - "BWAAAA!!" does nothing for your credibility - or anything else you post with more than one exclamation point. It makes you appear like a younger child than you are. Second - The rest of your paragraph is a disaster. Are you so wound up that you can't control yourself long enough to get your point across in two different statements? Awe.....how cute! I apparently got my point across quite well, Ms. Grammer. Sad, but typical response. Dan, have I asked you nicely to please stop agitating basskisser? It would please almost everyone in the group to no end. Thanks! -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Give it a rest, John. Since you already know "basskisser" is the problem, respond to him. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Wanted: Large Boat
On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 19:39:44 -0500, Dan
wrote: Give it a rest, John. Since you already know "basskisser" is the problem, respond to him. It takes two, Dan. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* |
Wanted: Large Boat
On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 22:52:21 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: On 12/25/2006 10:19 PM, JohnH wrote: On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 19:39:44 -0500, Dan wrote: Give it a rest, John. Since you already know "basskisser" is the problem, respond to him. It takes two, Dan. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* four or more. You and Reggie are part of this particular problem. All birds of a feather. Wrong again, Harry! You've not been having good days lately. Your assumptions are wrong, and your name-calling is reflecting a crappy disposition. Next year you should try getting into the Christmas spirit. Hope you have a great New Year! -- John |
Wanted: Large Boat
Dan wrote: JohnH wrote: On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 19:35:10 -0500, Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "Don White" wrote in message ... JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 20:09:43 GMT, Don White wrote: basskisser wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:55:14 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: On 12/21/2006 7:12 AM, JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:44:27 -0500, animal wrote: Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension problem......insisting that schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey requires being aged in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never comprehend. Same as last time, animal. Please don't agitate basskisser. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Facilitating again, eh? Perhaps you can explain how a request to stop agitating is facilitating anything other than the cessation of basskisser agitation. -- ****Happy Chanuka**** John H Perhaps if YOU'd STFU. better yet... he should directly take the offenders to task in a meaningful way... not a 'wink, wink, nudge nudge... leave the poor kid alone' routine. How would you have it done, Don? A simple request isn't good enough, I take it. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Talk to the Dans, the Calif Bills, the Jack Goffs etc like you talk to me, Harry or Basskisser. That should do it. You must have been one of those government employee's everybody talks about. Incompetent. Can not even read. John does try to control me and the Dan's. But we are semi-uncontrollable. Only SWBO can control. BWAAAHAAAA!!!! And John just said that you guys don't "puppy dog" each other!!!! Were you a government employee, Bill? What about THIS sentence: John does try to control me and the Dan's. First - "BWAAAA!!" does nothing for your credibility - or anything else you post with more than one exclamation point. It makes you appear like a younger child than you are. Second - The rest of your paragraph is a disaster. Are you so wound up that you can't control yourself long enough to get your point across in two different statements? Awe.....how cute! I apparently got my point across quite well, Ms. Grammer. Sad, but typical response. Dan, have I asked you nicely to please stop agitating basskisser? It would please almost everyone in the group to no end. Thanks! -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Give it a rest, John. Since you already know "basskisser" is the problem, respond to him. -- I'm the problem? You follow me like a little school girl to every post and reply I make, and that's MY fault??? Infatuation....... Infatuation...... It's driving Dan crazy...... It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY...... |
Wanted: Large Boat
basskisser wrote:
Dan wrote: JohnH wrote: On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 19:35:10 -0500, Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "Don White" wrote in message ... JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 20:09:43 GMT, Don White wrote: basskisser wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:55:14 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: On 12/21/2006 7:12 AM, JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:44:27 -0500, animal wrote: Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension problem......insisting that schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey requires being aged in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never comprehend. Same as last time, animal. Please don't agitate basskisser. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Facilitating again, eh? Perhaps you can explain how a request to stop agitating is facilitating anything other than the cessation of basskisser agitation. -- ****Happy Chanuka**** John H Perhaps if YOU'd STFU. better yet... he should directly take the offenders to task in a meaningful way... not a 'wink, wink, nudge nudge... leave the poor kid alone' routine. How would you have it done, Don? A simple request isn't good enough, I take it. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Talk to the Dans, the Calif Bills, the Jack Goffs etc like you talk to me, Harry or Basskisser. That should do it. You must have been one of those government employee's everybody talks about. Incompetent. Can not even read. John does try to control me and the Dan's. But we are semi-uncontrollable. Only SWBO can control. BWAAAHAAAA!!!! And John just said that you guys don't "puppy dog" each other!!!! Were you a government employee, Bill? What about THIS sentence: John does try to control me and the Dan's. First - "BWAAAA!!" does nothing for your credibility - or anything else you post with more than one exclamation point. It makes you appear like a younger child than you are. Second - The rest of your paragraph is a disaster. Are you so wound up that you can't control yourself long enough to get your point across in two different statements? Awe.....how cute! I apparently got my point across quite well, Ms. Grammer. Sad, but typical response. Dan, have I asked you nicely to please stop agitating basskisser? It would please almost everyone in the group to no end. Thanks! -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Give it a rest, John. Since you already know "basskisser" is the problem, respond to him. -- I'm the problem? You follow me like a little school girl to every post and reply I make, and that's MY fault??? Infatuation....... Infatuation...... It's driving Dan crazy...... It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY...... I don't "follow" you anywhere, nutjob. And "every" post? Where did you go to school? Did they teach you the meaning of the word "every"? Guess not or you missed that day. Keep trolling, boy. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Wanted: Large Boat
JohnH wrote:
On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 19:39:44 -0500, Dan wrote: Give it a rest, John. Since you already know "basskisser" is the problem, respond to him. It takes two, Dan. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* No, John, it takes one lunatic and a half dozen people who are trolled by the lunatic with attacks approaching libel. Consider your "neat guy" replies to Harry. How is that any different? It's not. Just a different lunatic and, coincidentally, they are newsgroup buddies! Get it now? -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Wanted: Large Boat
"Dan" wrote in message .. . JohnH wrote: On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 19:39:44 -0500, Dan wrote: Give it a rest, John. Since you already know "basskisser" is the problem, respond to him. It takes two, Dan. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* No, John, it takes one lunatic and a half dozen people who are trolled by the lunatic with attacks approaching libel. Consider your "neat guy" replies to Harry. How is that any different? It's not. Dan, it is just another of our sheriffs doing the 'do as I say, not as I do' routine. |
Wanted: Large Boat
Dan wrote:
basskisser wrote: Dan wrote: JohnH wrote: On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 19:35:10 -0500, Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "Don White" wrote in message ... JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 20:09:43 GMT, Don White wrote: basskisser wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:55:14 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: On 12/21/2006 7:12 AM, JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:44:27 -0500, animal wrote: Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension problem......insisting that schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey requires being aged in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never comprehend. Same as last time, animal. Please don't agitate basskisser. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Facilitating again, eh? Perhaps you can explain how a request to stop agitating is facilitating anything other than the cessation of basskisser agitation. -- ****Happy Chanuka**** John H Perhaps if YOU'd STFU. better yet... he should directly take the offenders to task in a meaningful way... not a 'wink, wink, nudge nudge... leave the poor kid alone' routine. How would you have it done, Don? A simple request isn't good enough, I take it. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Talk to the Dans, the Calif Bills, the Jack Goffs etc like you talk to me, Harry or Basskisser. That should do it. You must have been one of those government employee's everybody talks about. Incompetent. Can not even read. John does try to control me and the Dan's. But we are semi-uncontrollable. Only SWBO can control. BWAAAHAAAA!!!! And John just said that you guys don't "puppy dog" each other!!!! Were you a government employee, Bill? What about THIS sentence: John does try to control me and the Dan's. First - "BWAAAA!!" does nothing for your credibility - or anything else you post with more than one exclamation point. It makes you appear like a younger child than you are. Second - The rest of your paragraph is a disaster. Are you so wound up that you can't control yourself long enough to get your point across in two different statements? Awe.....how cute! I apparently got my point across quite well, Ms. Grammer. Sad, but typical response. Dan, have I asked you nicely to please stop agitating basskisser? It would please almost everyone in the group to no end. Thanks! -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Give it a rest, John. Since you already know "basskisser" is the problem, respond to him. -- I'm the problem? You follow me like a little school girl to every post and reply I make, and that's MY fault??? Infatuation....... Infatuation...... It's driving Dan crazy...... It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY...... I don't "follow" you anywhere, nutjob. And "every" post? Where did you go to school? Where ever the short bus took him. Did they teach you the meaning of the word "every"? They were too busy trying to teach him not to lick the windows. Guess not or you missed that day. Keep trolling, boy. |
Wanted: Large Boat
Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan wrote: JohnH wrote: On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 19:35:10 -0500, Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "Don White" wrote in message ... JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 20:09:43 GMT, Don White wrote: basskisser wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:55:14 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: On 12/21/2006 7:12 AM, JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:44:27 -0500, animal wrote: Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension problem......insisting that schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey requires being aged in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never comprehend. Same as last time, animal. Please don't agitate basskisser. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Facilitating again, eh? Perhaps you can explain how a request to stop agitating is facilitating anything other than the cessation of basskisser agitation. -- ****Happy Chanuka**** John H Perhaps if YOU'd STFU. better yet... he should directly take the offenders to task in a meaningful way... not a 'wink, wink, nudge nudge... leave the poor kid alone' routine. How would you have it done, Don? A simple request isn't good enough, I take it. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Talk to the Dans, the Calif Bills, the Jack Goffs etc like you talk to me, Harry or Basskisser. That should do it. You must have been one of those government employee's everybody talks about. Incompetent. Can not even read. John does try to control me and the Dan's. But we are semi-uncontrollable. Only SWBO can control. BWAAAHAAAA!!!! And John just said that you guys don't "puppy dog" each other!!!! Were you a government employee, Bill? What about THIS sentence: John does try to control me and the Dan's. First - "BWAAAA!!" does nothing for your credibility - or anything else you post with more than one exclamation point. It makes you appear like a younger child than you are. Second - The rest of your paragraph is a disaster. Are you so wound up that you can't control yourself long enough to get your point across in two different statements? Awe.....how cute! I apparently got my point across quite well, Ms. Grammer. Sad, but typical response. Dan, have I asked you nicely to please stop agitating basskisser? It would please almost everyone in the group to no end. Thanks! -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Give it a rest, John. Since you already know "basskisser" is the problem, respond to him. -- I'm the problem? You follow me like a little school girl to every post and reply I make, and that's MY fault??? Infatuation....... Infatuation...... It's driving Dan crazy...... It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY...... I don't "follow" you anywhere, nutjob. And "every" post? Where did you go to school? Did they teach you the meaning of the word "every"? Guess not or you missed that day. Keep trolling, boy. Awe, your once again resorting to childish and petty name calling, how cute! Show me one thread in the last month that you haven't followed me to. Infatuation...... Infatuation..... It's driving Dan crazy.... It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY.... |
Wanted: Large Boat
Dan wrote: JohnH wrote: On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 19:39:44 -0500, Dan wrote: Give it a rest, John. Since you already know "basskisser" is the problem, respond to him. It takes two, Dan. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* No, John, it takes one lunatic and a half dozen people who are trolled by the lunatic with attacks approaching libel. Cite? Consider your "neat guy" replies to Harry. How is that any different? It's not. Just a different lunatic and, coincidentally, they are newsgroup buddies! Get it now? *I* get it, and have for some time. You are a stalker, and your infatuation with me DOES border on lunacy. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Wanted: Large Boat
JimH wrote: "Dan" wrote in message .. . JohnH wrote: On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 19:39:44 -0500, Dan wrote: Give it a rest, John. Since you already know "basskisser" is the problem, respond to him. It takes two, Dan. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* No, John, it takes one lunatic and a half dozen people who are trolled by the lunatic with attacks approaching libel. Consider your "neat guy" replies to Harry. How is that any different? It's not. Dan, it is just another of our sheriffs doing the 'do as I say, not as I do' routine. Jim, it's so good to see you back and doing NOTHING except stirring ****. You're certainly living up to your reputation as a complete ass. |
Wanted: Large Boat
basskisser wrote:
*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Talk to the Dans, the Calif Bills, the Jack Goffs etc like you talk to me, Harry or Basskisser. That should do it. You must have been one of those government employee's everybody talks about. Incompetent. Can not even read. John does try to control me and the Dan's. But we are semi-uncontrollable. Only SWBO can control. BWAAAHAAAA!!!! And John just said that you guys don't "puppy dog" each other!!!! Were you a government employee, Bill? What about THIS sentence: John does try to control me and the Dan's. First - "BWAAAA!!" does nothing for your credibility - or anything else you post with more than one exclamation point. It makes you appear like a younger child than you are. Second - The rest of your paragraph is a disaster. Are you so wound up that you can't control yourself long enough to get your point across in two different statements? Awe.....how cute! I apparently got my point across quite well, Ms. Grammer. Sad, but typical response. Dan, have I asked you nicely to please stop agitating basskisser? It would please almost everyone in the group to no end. Thanks! -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Give it a rest, John. Since you already know "basskisser" is the problem, respond to him. -- I'm the problem? You follow me like a little school girl to every post and reply I make, and that's MY fault??? Infatuation....... Infatuation...... It's driving Dan crazy...... It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY...... I don't "follow" you anywhere, nutjob. And "every" post? Where did you go to school? Did they teach you the meaning of the word "every"? Guess not or you missed that day. Keep trolling, boy. Awe, your once again resorting to childish and petty name calling, how cute! Show me one thread in the last month that you haven't followed me to. Infatuation...... Infatuation..... It's driving Dan crazy.... It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY.... Short memory, boy? I have nothing to prove to you and you continue to make this insane accusation. Post proof or retract. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Wanted: Large Boat
basskisser wrote:
JimH wrote: "Dan" wrote in message ... JohnH wrote: On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 19:39:44 -0500, Dan wrote: Give it a rest, John. Since you already know "basskisser" is the problem, respond to him. It takes two, Dan. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* No, John, it takes one lunatic and a half dozen people who are trolled by the lunatic with attacks approaching libel. Consider your "neat guy" replies to Harry. How is that any different? It's not. Dan, it is just another of our sheriffs doing the 'do as I say, not as I do' routine. Jim, it's so good to see you back and doing NOTHING except stirring ****. You're certainly living up to your reputation as a complete ass. This post was brought to you by the boy who has posted "Awe, your once again resorting to childish and petty name calling, how cute!" several times for your enjoyment. If he didn't miss all of those days at school while tending his crops, he would know that "your" and "you're" are two different words and he chose the wrong one. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Wanted: Large Boat
On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 20:05:56 -0500, Dan
wrote: basskisser wrote: JimH wrote: "Dan" wrote in message m... JohnH wrote: On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 19:39:44 -0500, Dan wrote: Give it a rest, John. Since you already know "basskisser" is the problem, respond to him. It takes two, Dan. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* No, John, it takes one lunatic and a half dozen people who are trolled by the lunatic with attacks approaching libel. Consider your "neat guy" replies to Harry. How is that any different? It's not. My 'neat' replies to Harry's name-calling do not go on, and on, and on. He calls someone an asshole, I pay him a compliment. End of thread. I have basskisser killfiled. Responding to him is not feasible, except through another, and I don't think agitating him is worthwhile. -- John |
Wanted: Large Boat
JohnH wrote:
On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 20:05:56 -0500, Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: JimH wrote: "Dan" wrote in message om... JohnH wrote: On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 19:39:44 -0500, Dan wrote: Give it a rest, John. Since you already know "basskisser" is the problem, respond to him. It takes two, Dan. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* No, John, it takes one lunatic and a half dozen people who are trolled by the lunatic with attacks approaching libel. Consider your "neat guy" replies to Harry. How is that any different? It's not. My 'neat' replies to Harry's name-calling do not go on, and on, and on. He calls someone an asshole, I pay him a compliment. End of thread. I have basskisser killfiled. Responding to him is not feasible, except through another, and I don't think agitating him is worthwhile. -- John If he badgered and libeled you it would continue, John - you know that. Why not add Harry to your killfile since your policy seems to be to remove the source, not the targets? -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Wanted: Large Boat
Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Talk to the Dans, the Calif Bills, the Jack Goffs etc like you talk to me, Harry or Basskisser. That should do it. You must have been one of those government employee's everybody talks about. Incompetent. Can not even read. John does try to control me and the Dan's. But we are semi-uncontrollable. Only SWBO can control. BWAAAHAAAA!!!! And John just said that you guys don't "puppy dog" each other!!!! Were you a government employee, Bill? What about THIS sentence: John does try to control me and the Dan's. First - "BWAAAA!!" does nothing for your credibility - or anything else you post with more than one exclamation point. It makes you appear like a younger child than you are. Second - The rest of your paragraph is a disaster. Are you so wound up that you can't control yourself long enough to get your point across in two different statements? Awe.....how cute! I apparently got my point across quite well, Ms. Grammer. Sad, but typical response. Dan, have I asked you nicely to please stop agitating basskisser? It would please almost everyone in the group to no end. Thanks! -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Give it a rest, John. Since you already know "basskisser" is the problem, respond to him. -- I'm the problem? You follow me like a little school girl to every post and reply I make, and that's MY fault??? Infatuation....... Infatuation...... It's driving Dan crazy...... It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY...... I don't "follow" you anywhere, nutjob. And "every" post? Where did you go to school? Did they teach you the meaning of the word "every"? Guess not or you missed that day. Keep trolling, boy. Awe, your once again resorting to childish and petty name calling, how cute! Show me one thread in the last month that you haven't followed me to. Infatuation...... Infatuation..... It's driving Dan crazy.... It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY.... Short memory, boy? I have nothing to prove to you and you continue to make this insane accusation. Post proof or retract. He rec.boats. |
Wanted: Large Boat
Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: JimH wrote: "Dan" wrote in message ... JohnH wrote: On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 19:39:44 -0500, Dan wrote: Give it a rest, John. Since you already know "basskisser" is the problem, respond to him. It takes two, Dan. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* No, John, it takes one lunatic and a half dozen people who are trolled by the lunatic with attacks approaching libel. Consider your "neat guy" replies to Harry. How is that any different? It's not. Dan, it is just another of our sheriffs doing the 'do as I say, not as I do' routine. Jim, it's so good to see you back and doing NOTHING except stirring ****. You're certainly living up to your reputation as a complete ass. This post was brought to you by the boy who has posted "Awe, your once again resorting to childish and petty name calling, how cute!" several times for your enjoyment. If he didn't miss all of those days at school while tending his crops, he would know that "your" and "you're" are two different words and he chose the wrong one. What crops? Be specific. How do you know that I have any "crops"? What are they? Where are they? How big? -- |
Wanted: Large Boat
Dan wrote: JohnH wrote: On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 20:05:56 -0500, Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: JimH wrote: "Dan" wrote in message om... JohnH wrote: On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 19:39:44 -0500, Dan wrote: Give it a rest, John. Since you already know "basskisser" is the problem, respond to him. It takes two, Dan. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* No, John, it takes one lunatic and a half dozen people who are trolled by the lunatic with attacks approaching libel. Consider your "neat guy" replies to Harry. How is that any different? It's not. My 'neat' replies to Harry's name-calling do not go on, and on, and on. He calls someone an asshole, I pay him a compliment. End of thread. I have basskisser killfiled. Responding to him is not feasible, except through another, and I don't think agitating him is worthwhile. -- John If he badgered and libeled you it would continue, John - you know that. Why not add Harry to your killfile since your policy seems to be to remove the source, not the targets? Damn that's funny!! You follow me to every post I make, accuse me of growing pot, accuse me of many, many other things, yet you feel "badgered and libeled"????? BWAAHAAA!!! |
Wanted: Large Boat
On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 20:42:14 -0500, Dan
wrote: JohnH wrote: On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 20:05:56 -0500, Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: JimH wrote: "Dan" wrote in message . com... JohnH wrote: On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 19:39:44 -0500, Dan wrote: Give it a rest, John. Since you already know "basskisser" is the problem, respond to him. It takes two, Dan. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* No, John, it takes one lunatic and a half dozen people who are trolled by the lunatic with attacks approaching libel. Consider your "neat guy" replies to Harry. How is that any different? It's not. My 'neat' replies to Harry's name-calling do not go on, and on, and on. He calls someone an asshole, I pay him a compliment. End of thread. I have basskisser killfiled. Responding to him is not feasible, except through another, and I don't think agitating him is worthwhile. -- John If he badgered and libeled you it would continue, John - you know that. Why not add Harry to your killfile since your policy seems to be to remove the source, not the targets? He badgers and libels you because you allow him to. As to the killfile, Harry and I do not go on, and on, and on, and on, saying the same thing to each other post after post and thread after thread and day after day and so on. He calls someone an asshole, I compliment him. End of thread. -- John |
Wanted: Large Boat
basskisser wrote:
Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Talk to the Dans, the Calif Bills, the Jack Goffs etc like you talk to me, Harry or Basskisser. That should do it. You must have been one of those government employee's everybody talks about. Incompetent. Can not even read. John does try to control me and the Dan's. But we are semi-uncontrollable. Only SWBO can control. BWAAAHAAAA!!!! And John just said that you guys don't "puppy dog" each other!!!! Were you a government employee, Bill? What about THIS sentence: John does try to control me and the Dan's. First - "BWAAAA!!" does nothing for your credibility - or anything else you post with more than one exclamation point. It makes you appear like a younger child than you are. Second - The rest of your paragraph is a disaster. Are you so wound up that you can't control yourself long enough to get your point across in two different statements? Awe.....how cute! I apparently got my point across quite well, Ms. Grammer. Sad, but typical response. Dan, have I asked you nicely to please stop agitating basskisser? It would please almost everyone in the group to no end. Thanks! -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Give it a rest, John. Since you already know "basskisser" is the problem, respond to him. -- I'm the problem? You follow me like a little school girl to every post and reply I make, and that's MY fault??? Infatuation....... Infatuation...... It's driving Dan crazy...... It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY...... I don't "follow" you anywhere, nutjob. And "every" post? Where did you go to school? Did they teach you the meaning of the word "every"? Guess not or you missed that day. Keep trolling, boy. Awe, your once again resorting to childish and petty name calling, how cute! Show me one thread in the last month that you haven't followed me to. Infatuation...... Infatuation..... It's driving Dan crazy.... It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY.... Short memory, boy? I have nothing to prove to you and you continue to make this insane accusation. Post proof or retract. He rec.boats. And that proves you to be a liar. Nothing new so no surprise. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Wanted: Large Boat
basskisser wrote:
Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: JimH wrote: "Dan" wrote in message om... JohnH wrote: On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 19:39:44 -0500, Dan wrote: Give it a rest, John. Since you already know "basskisser" is the problem, respond to him. It takes two, Dan. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* No, John, it takes one lunatic and a half dozen people who are trolled by the lunatic with attacks approaching libel. Consider your "neat guy" replies to Harry. How is that any different? It's not. Dan, it is just another of our sheriffs doing the 'do as I say, not as I do' routine. Jim, it's so good to see you back and doing NOTHING except stirring ****. You're certainly living up to your reputation as a complete ass. This post was brought to you by the boy who has posted "Awe, your once again resorting to childish and petty name calling, how cute!" several times for your enjoyment. If he didn't miss all of those days at school while tending his crops, he would know that "your" and "you're" are two different words and he chose the wrong one. What crops? Be specific. How do you know that I have any "crops"? What are they? Where are they? How big? -- This post was brought to you by the boy who has posted "Awe, your once again resorting to childish and petty name calling, how cute!" several times for your enjoyment. Vidalia onions and peaches? -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Wanted: Large Boat
basskisser wrote:
Dan wrote: JohnH wrote: On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 20:05:56 -0500, Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: JimH wrote: "Dan" wrote in message .com... JohnH wrote: On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 19:39:44 -0500, Dan wrote: Give it a rest, John. Since you already know "basskisser" is the problem, respond to him. It takes two, Dan. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* No, John, it takes one lunatic and a half dozen people who are trolled by the lunatic with attacks approaching libel. Consider your "neat guy" replies to Harry. How is that any different? It's not. My 'neat' replies to Harry's name-calling do not go on, and on, and on. He calls someone an asshole, I pay him a compliment. End of thread. I have basskisser killfiled. Responding to him is not feasible, except through another, and I don't think agitating him is worthwhile. -- John If he badgered and libeled you it would continue, John - you know that. Why not add Harry to your killfile since your policy seems to be to remove the source, not the targets? Damn that's funny!! You follow me to every post I make, accuse me of growing pot, accuse me of many, many other things, yet you feel "badgered and libeled"????? BWAAHAAA!!! Enjoy it while you can. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Wanted: Large Boat
JohnH wrote:
On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 20:42:14 -0500, Dan wrote: JohnH wrote: On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 20:05:56 -0500, Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: JimH wrote: "Dan" wrote in message .com... JohnH wrote: On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 19:39:44 -0500, Dan wrote: Give it a rest, John. Since you already know "basskisser" is the problem, respond to him. It takes two, Dan. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* No, John, it takes one lunatic and a half dozen people who are trolled by the lunatic with attacks approaching libel. Consider your "neat guy" replies to Harry. How is that any different? It's not. My 'neat' replies to Harry's name-calling do not go on, and on, and on. He calls someone an asshole, I pay him a compliment. End of thread. I have basskisser killfiled. Responding to him is not feasible, except through another, and I don't think agitating him is worthwhile. -- John If he badgered and libeled you it would continue, John - you know that. Why not add Harry to your killfile since your policy seems to be to remove the source, not the targets? He badgers and libels you because you allow him to. As to the killfile, Harry and I do not go on, and on, and on, and on, saying the same thing to each other post after post and thread after thread and day after day and so on. He calls someone an asshole, I compliment him. End of thread. -- John You missed the mark. Kevin is the king of the four-line response among his other catch phrases of the week. I, and others, are able to respond appropriately and with limited repetition. You modify your "neat guy" response but your point is always the same. You are welcome to do and post what you want, but don't ask the rest of us to not do the same. dan -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Wanted: Large Boat
On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:14:53 -0500, Dan
wrote: JohnH wrote: On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 20:42:14 -0500, Dan wrote: JohnH wrote: On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 20:05:56 -0500, Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: JimH wrote: "Dan" wrote in message s.com... JohnH wrote: On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 19:39:44 -0500, Dan wrote: Give it a rest, John. Since you already know "basskisser" is the problem, respond to him. It takes two, Dan. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* No, John, it takes one lunatic and a half dozen people who are trolled by the lunatic with attacks approaching libel. Consider your "neat guy" replies to Harry. How is that any different? It's not. My 'neat' replies to Harry's name-calling do not go on, and on, and on. He calls someone an asshole, I pay him a compliment. End of thread. I have basskisser killfiled. Responding to him is not feasible, except through another, and I don't think agitating him is worthwhile. -- John If he badgered and libeled you it would continue, John - you know that. Why not add Harry to your killfile since your policy seems to be to remove the source, not the targets? He badgers and libels you because you allow him to. As to the killfile, Harry and I do not go on, and on, and on, and on, saying the same thing to each other post after post and thread after thread and day after day and so on. He calls someone an asshole, I compliment him. End of thread. -- John You missed the mark. Kevin is the king of the four-line response among his other catch phrases of the week. I, and others, are able to respond appropriately and with limited repetition. You modify your "neat guy" response but your point is always the same. You are welcome to do and post what you want, but don't ask the rest of us to not do the same. dan You go, Dan. You've earned everyone's high esteem because you can argue with basskisser endlessly. -- John |
Wanted: Large Boat
Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Talk to the Dans, the Calif Bills, the Jack Goffs etc like you talk to me, Harry or Basskisser. That should do it. You must have been one of those government employee's everybody talks about. Incompetent. Can not even read. John does try to control me and the Dan's. But we are semi-uncontrollable. Only SWBO can control. BWAAAHAAAA!!!! And John just said that you guys don't "puppy dog" each other!!!! Were you a government employee, Bill? What about THIS sentence: John does try to control me and the Dan's. First - "BWAAAA!!" does nothing for your credibility - or anything else you post with more than one exclamation point. It makes you appear like a younger child than you are. Second - The rest of your paragraph is a disaster. Are you so wound up that you can't control yourself long enough to get your point across in two different statements? Awe.....how cute! I apparently got my point across quite well, Ms. Grammer. Sad, but typical response. Dan, have I asked you nicely to please stop agitating basskisser? It would please almost everyone in the group to no end. Thanks! -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Give it a rest, John. Since you already know "basskisser" is the problem, respond to him. -- I'm the problem? You follow me like a little school girl to every post and reply I make, and that's MY fault??? Infatuation....... Infatuation...... It's driving Dan crazy...... It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY...... I don't "follow" you anywhere, nutjob. And "every" post? Where did you go to school? Did they teach you the meaning of the word "every"? Guess not or you missed that day. Keep trolling, boy. Awe, your once again resorting to childish and petty name calling, how cute! Show me one thread in the last month that you haven't followed me to. Infatuation...... Infatuation..... It's driving Dan crazy.... It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY.... Short memory, boy? I have nothing to prove to you and you continue to make this insane accusation. Post proof or retract. He rec.boats. And that proves you to be a liar. Nothing new so no surprise. -- How, stalker? |
Wanted: Large Boat
basskisser wrote:
Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Talk to the Dans, the Calif Bills, the Jack Goffs etc like you talk to me, Harry or Basskisser. That should do it. You must have been one of those government employee's everybody talks about. Incompetent. Can not even read. John does try to control me and the Dan's. But we are semi-uncontrollable. Only SWBO can control. BWAAAHAAAA!!!! And John just said that you guys don't "puppy dog" each other!!!! Were you a government employee, Bill? What about THIS sentence: John does try to control me and the Dan's. First - "BWAAAA!!" does nothing for your credibility - or anything else you post with more than one exclamation point. It makes you appear like a younger child than you are. Second - The rest of your paragraph is a disaster. Are you so wound up that you can't control yourself long enough to get your point across in two different statements? Awe.....how cute! I apparently got my point across quite well, Ms. Grammer. Sad, but typical response. Dan, have I asked you nicely to please stop agitating basskisser? It would please almost everyone in the group to no end. Thanks! -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Give it a rest, John. Since you already know "basskisser" is the problem, respond to him. -- I'm the problem? You follow me like a little school girl to every post and reply I make, and that's MY fault??? Infatuation....... Infatuation...... It's driving Dan crazy...... It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY...... I don't "follow" you anywhere, nutjob. And "every" post? Where did you go to school? Did they teach you the meaning of the word "every"? Guess not or you missed that day. Keep trolling, boy. Awe, your once again resorting to childish and petty name calling, how cute! Show me one thread in the last month that you haven't followed me to. Infatuation...... Infatuation..... It's driving Dan crazy.... It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY.... Short memory, boy? I have nothing to prove to you and you continue to make this insane accusation. Post proof or retract. He rec.boats. And that proves you to be a liar. Nothing new so no surprise. -- How, stalker? I'm not clear on this. Are you calling me a stalker? Who am I stalking? Please be very specific. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Wanted: Large Boat
Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Talk to the Dans, the Calif Bills, the Jack Goffs etc like you talk to me, Harry or Basskisser. That should do it. You must have been one of those government employee's everybody talks about. Incompetent. Can not even read. John does try to control me and the Dan's. But we are semi-uncontrollable. Only SWBO can control. BWAAAHAAAA!!!! And John just said that you guys don't "puppy dog" each other!!!! Were you a government employee, Bill? What about THIS sentence: John does try to control me and the Dan's. First - "BWAAAA!!" does nothing for your credibility - or anything else you post with more than one exclamation point. It makes you appear like a younger child than you are. Second - The rest of your paragraph is a disaster. Are you so wound up that you can't control yourself long enough to get your point across in two different statements? Awe.....how cute! I apparently got my point across quite well, Ms. Grammer. Sad, but typical response. Dan, have I asked you nicely to please stop agitating basskisser? It would please almost everyone in the group to no end. Thanks! -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Give it a rest, John. Since you already know "basskisser" is the problem, respond to him. -- I'm the problem? You follow me like a little school girl to every post and reply I make, and that's MY fault??? Infatuation....... Infatuation...... It's driving Dan crazy...... It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY...... I don't "follow" you anywhere, nutjob. And "every" post? Where did you go to school? Did they teach you the meaning of the word "every"? Guess not or you missed that day. Keep trolling, boy. Awe, your once again resorting to childish and petty name calling, how cute! Show me one thread in the last month that you haven't followed me to. Infatuation...... Infatuation..... It's driving Dan crazy.... It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY.... Short memory, boy? I have nothing to prove to you and you continue to make this insane accusation. Post proof or retract. He rec.boats. And that proves you to be a liar. Nothing new so no surprise. -- How, stalker? I'm not clear on this. Are you calling me a stalker? Who am I stalking? Please be very specific. -- That's odd, you expect me to be "very specific" in answering your questions all the while avoiding mine. |
Wanted: Large Boat
basskisser wrote:
Dan wrote: Short memory, boy? I have nothing to prove to you and you continue to make this insane accusation. Post proof or retract. He rec.boats. And that proves you to be a liar. Nothing new so no surprise. -- How, stalker? I'm not clear on this. Are you calling me a stalker? Who am I stalking? Please be very specific. -- That's odd, you expect me to be "very specific" in answering your questions all the while avoiding mine. You aren't very smart, are you? A real man would be able to read and follow this thread. Do you give all of that pot to your sick friend, boy? IF you do then what's your excuse? -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Wanted: Large Boat
Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan wrote: Short memory, boy? I have nothing to prove to you and you continue to make this insane accusation. Post proof or retract. He rec.boats. And that proves you to be a liar. Nothing new so no surprise. -- How, stalker? I'm not clear on this. Are you calling me a stalker? Who am I stalking? Please be very specific. -- That's odd, you expect me to be "very specific" in answering your questions all the while avoiding mine. You aren't very smart, are you? A real man would be able to read and follow this thread. Do you give all of that pot to your sick friend, boy? IF you do then what's your excuse? -- This thread is *Wanted: Large Boat* What in hell does your above blather have to do with that? And why does your inability to answer my questions make you think that it's my fault for not following the thread, stalker? |
Wanted: Large Boat
An article on derelict boats in the Sac Delta.
http://www.insidebayarea.com/trivalleyherald/ci_4931714 |
Wanted: Large Boat
Calif Bill wrote: An article on derelict boats in the Sac Delta. http://www.insidebayarea.com/trivalleyherald/ci_4931714 Great, an article about homeless people ON those FLOATING derelict boats. Thanks for making my point! You said that there are no abandoned boats in the delta that are capable of floating or could be made to float cheaply. Now you are saying there are lots of floating structures that the homeless are using as housing!! Which is it? |
Wanted: Large Boat
"basskisser" wrote in message oups.com... Calif Bill wrote: An article on derelict boats in the Sac Delta. http://www.insidebayarea.com/trivalleyherald/ci_4931714 Great, an article about homeless people ON those FLOATING derelict boats. Thanks for making my point! You said that there are no abandoned boats in the delta that are capable of floating or could be made to float cheaply. Now you are saying there are lots of floating structures that the homeless are using as housing!! Which is it? There are wrecks barely floating and none that are 1992, was the year I think the TV show wanted, floating. |
Wanted: Large Boat
Calif Bill wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message oups.com... Calif Bill wrote: An article on derelict boats in the Sac Delta. http://www.insidebayarea.com/trivalleyherald/ci_4931714 Great, an article about homeless people ON those FLOATING derelict boats. Thanks for making my point! You said that there are no abandoned boats in the delta that are capable of floating or could be made to float cheaply. Now you are saying there are lots of floating structures that the homeless are using as housing!! Which is it? There are wrecks barely floating and none that are 1992, was the year I think the TV show wanted, floating. I watched a TV show last night about San Diago beach patrol, one of the things they mentioned was having a severe problem with people beaching and abandoning boats in the bay area |
Wanted: Large Boat
Calif Bill wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message oups.com... Calif Bill wrote: An article on derelict boats in the Sac Delta. http://www.insidebayarea.com/trivalleyherald/ci_4931714 Great, an article about homeless people ON those FLOATING derelict boats. Thanks for making my point! You said that there are no abandoned boats in the delta that are capable of floating or could be made to float cheaply. Now you are saying there are lots of floating structures that the homeless are using as housing!! Which is it? There are wrecks barely floating and none that are 1992, was the year I think the TV show wanted, floating. You know for a FACT that there are "none" that are 1992 in all of the delta? How do you know this? Oh, and of course, you are wrong about THAT! |
Wanted: Large Boat
"basskisser" wrote in message oups.com... Calif Bill wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message oups.com... Calif Bill wrote: An article on derelict boats in the Sac Delta. http://www.insidebayarea.com/trivalleyherald/ci_4931714 Great, an article about homeless people ON those FLOATING derelict boats. Thanks for making my point! You said that there are no abandoned boats in the delta that are capable of floating or could be made to float cheaply. Now you are saying there are lots of floating structures that the homeless are using as housing!! Which is it? There are wrecks barely floating and none that are 1992, was the year I think the TV show wanted, floating. You know for a FACT that there are "none" that are 1992 in all of the delta? How do you know this? Oh, and of course, you are wrong about THAT! OK I am wrong. You happy now? I bow to your perfectness, Mr. Schnapps. |
Wanted: Large Boat
"Calif Bill" wrote in message ink.net... "basskisser" wrote in message oups.com... Calif Bill wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message oups.com... Calif Bill wrote: An article on derelict boats in the Sac Delta. http://www.insidebayarea.com/trivalleyherald/ci_4931714 Great, an article about homeless people ON those FLOATING derelict boats. Thanks for making my point! You said that there are no abandoned boats in the delta that are capable of floating or could be made to float cheaply. Now you are saying there are lots of floating structures that the homeless are using as housing!! Which is it? There are wrecks barely floating and none that are 1992, was the year I think the TV show wanted, floating. You know for a FACT that there are "none" that are 1992 in all of the delta? How do you know this? Oh, and of course, you are wrong about THAT! OK I am wrong. You happy now? I bow to your perfectness, Mr. Schnapps. You bad! |
Wanted: Large Boat
Calif Bill wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message oups.com... Calif Bill wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message oups.com... Calif Bill wrote: An article on derelict boats in the Sac Delta. http://www.insidebayarea.com/trivalleyherald/ci_4931714 Great, an article about homeless people ON those FLOATING derelict boats. Thanks for making my point! You said that there are no abandoned boats in the delta that are capable of floating or could be made to float cheaply. Now you are saying there are lots of floating structures that the homeless are using as housing!! Which is it? There are wrecks barely floating and none that are 1992, was the year I think the TV show wanted, floating. You know for a FACT that there are "none" that are 1992 in all of the delta? How do you know this? Oh, and of course, you are wrong about THAT! OK I am wrong. You happy now? I bow to your perfectness, Mr. Schnapps. Good. You finally figured it out, or have just been trying to cover your tracks for weeks? |
Wanted: Large Boat
"basskisser" wrote in message ups.com... Calif Bill wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message oups.com... Calif Bill wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message oups.com... Calif Bill wrote: An article on derelict boats in the Sac Delta. http://www.insidebayarea.com/trivalleyherald/ci_4931714 Great, an article about homeless people ON those FLOATING derelict boats. Thanks for making my point! You said that there are no abandoned boats in the delta that are capable of floating or could be made to float cheaply. Now you are saying there are lots of floating structures that the homeless are using as housing!! Which is it? There are wrecks barely floating and none that are 1992, was the year I think the TV show wanted, floating. You know for a FACT that there are "none" that are 1992 in all of the delta? How do you know this? Oh, and of course, you are wrong about THAT! OK I am wrong. You happy now? I bow to your perfectness, Mr. Schnapps. Good. You finally figured it out, or have just been trying to cover your tracks for weeks? Ok, Mr. Schnapps. |
Wanted: Large Boat
Calif Bill wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message ups.com... Calif Bill wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message oups.com... Calif Bill wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message oups.com... Calif Bill wrote: An article on derelict boats in the Sac Delta. http://www.insidebayarea.com/trivalleyherald/ci_4931714 Great, an article about homeless people ON those FLOATING derelict boats. Thanks for making my point! You said that there are no abandoned boats in the delta that are capable of floating or could be made to float cheaply. Now you are saying there are lots of floating structures that the homeless are using as housing!! Which is it? There are wrecks barely floating and none that are 1992, was the year I think the TV show wanted, floating. You know for a FACT that there are "none" that are 1992 in all of the delta? How do you know this? Oh, and of course, you are wrong about THAT! OK I am wrong. You happy now? I bow to your perfectness, Mr. Schnapps. Good. You finally figured it out, or have just been trying to cover your tracks for weeks? Ok, Mr. Schnapps. Okay, Mr. 35hp Wankel Evinrude that would do 70 m.p.h. Okay, Mr. Every abandoned boat in the delta doesn't float, can't be made to float, and there aren't any that are 1992's. Okay Mr. The marinas just simply scuttle boats that fees are deliquent on. Okay, Mr. Jeeps have bad transmissions. Okay Mr. I tell lies about others as soon as I'm proven to be wrong again. |
Wanted: Large Boat
"basskisser" wrote in message ups.com... Calif Bill wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message ups.com... Calif Bill wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message oups.com... Calif Bill wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message oups.com... Calif Bill wrote: An article on derelict boats in the Sac Delta. http://www.insidebayarea.com/trivalleyherald/ci_4931714 Great, an article about homeless people ON those FLOATING derelict boats. Thanks for making my point! You said that there are no abandoned boats in the delta that are capable of floating or could be made to float cheaply. Now you are saying there are lots of floating structures that the homeless are using as housing!! Which is it? There are wrecks barely floating and none that are 1992, was the year I think the TV show wanted, floating. You know for a FACT that there are "none" that are 1992 in all of the delta? How do you know this? Oh, and of course, you are wrong about THAT! OK I am wrong. You happy now? I bow to your perfectness, Mr. Schnapps. Good. You finally figured it out, or have just been trying to cover your tracks for weeks? Ok, Mr. Schnapps. Okay, Mr. 35hp Wankel Evinrude that would do 70 m.p.h. Okay, Mr. Every abandoned boat in the delta doesn't float, can't be made to float, and there aren't any that are 1992's. Okay Mr. The marinas just simply scuttle boats that fees are deliquent on. Okay, Mr. Jeeps have bad transmissions. Okay Mr. I tell lies about others as soon as I'm proven to be wrong again. Wankel did do 35. Just because you are ignorant of most items and social skills, does not mean everybody else is. And jeeps cherokees were famous for bad tranny. Had 2 friends where the jeep spend more time wait for tranny repair than driving. And the marina did not scuttle. It sells the boat to a salvager if the owner fails to pay fees. Want me to explain it again. And I still doubt you are a registered PE! |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:31 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com