|
Wanted: Large Boat
Calif Bill wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message oups.com... Calif Bill wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message oups.com... Calif Bill wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message ups.com... Calif Bill wrote: If you are into Karate, you have taken at least a thousand too many blows to the brain. Or you took on a NYC taxi driver, who replied to your Karate stance with a NYC taxi driver tire iron response. Myth Busters wants a cheap hull. Why pay pay, when you can get one free, or almost free. All those abandoned hulls in the Sac Delta, are not floating. None of them? And none can be made to float? I see that you realize that you are wrong, as usual. So predictable, when found, as usual, that you are wrong, you instantly start your childish and petty insults. It would cost more to float them than buying a floating boat, and most are not 1990 and newer models. Every boat on the Delta, which is "littered" with boats? None of them float? None of them are capable of floating without a lot of work? NONE? How do you know this? Have you surveyed every single abandoned boat on the Delta that is "littered" with them? Most are sunk, or in the tules aground. If they are easy to remove the county contractor has removed them. The others take more work, there for cost more, so they are still there. This is the last comment on the subject, as you just like to argue, and nothing good comes from wrestling with a pig in mud. But you didn't say "most" above. So, are you saying, without a doubt, that every scuttled boat in the whole Delta couldn't be made to float without extensive work? Are you also saying that you have really surveyed every single boat to know that it won't float without extensive work? You get stupider everyday! Smoking more pot? There you go!!! I KNEW when you figured out how stupid your post was that every single boat that is scuttled in the delta won't float or can not be made to float cheaply, that you'd resort to your childish and idiotic insults!! How predictable. Now, why won't you answer my above questions, Bill? YOU are the one stating such! Also, please show what evidence you have that I have EVER smoked pot? OR, are you just once again, posting in pure ignorance? |
Wanted: Large Boat
"basskisser" wrote in message ps.com... So, there you go Bill.....thanks for playing. I know, I know, you've once again been proven dead wrong, so you'll resort to childish name calling, then low life comments about me, my wife and my kids..... You have a wife and kids? I'd pay money to see that family portrait. LOL! |
Wanted: Large Boat
Sam wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message ps.com... So, there you go Bill.....thanks for playing. I know, I know, you've once again been proven dead wrong, so you'll resort to childish name calling, then low life comments about me, my wife and my kids..... You have a wife and kids? I'd pay money to see that family portrait. How much? I've got a lovely wife and two lovely kids. Why would you think any different? Or are you STILL posting in ignorance? |
Wanted: Large Boat
"basskisser" wrote in message oups.com... Mike wrote: What about those who persist in arguing with him? *That* I don't get at all! --Mike Oh, man!!!! Don't get a single sentence, yet has th audacity to call ME a moron... This is PRICELESS!!!!! Moron- 1. a person who is notably stupid or lacking in good judgment. 2. Psychology. a person of borderline intelligence in a former classification of mental retardation, having an intelligence quotient of 50 to 69. Seems to fit you like a glove. LOL! |
Wanted: Large Boat
Sam wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message oups.com... Mike wrote: What about those who persist in arguing with him? *That* I don't get at all! --Mike Oh, man!!!! Don't get a single sentence, yet has th audacity to call ME a moron... This is PRICELESS!!!!! Moron- 1. a person who is notably stupid or lacking in good judgment. 2. Psychology. a person of borderline intelligence in a former classification of mental retardation, having an intelligence quotient of 50 to 69. Seems to fit you like a glove. LOL! Well, let's see, please, tell the group how you know any of the above? Please provide all evidence. When did you give me an IQ test? Where did you get your psychology degree? Where are you licensed to practice? License information, please. OR are you STILL posting in ignorance? ig·no·rance /ˈɪgnərəns/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[ig-ner-uhns] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation –noun the state or fact of being ignorant; lack of knowledge, learning, information, etc. |
Wanted: Large Boat
"basskisser" wrote in message ps.com... Sam wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message ps.com... So, there you go Bill.....thanks for playing. I know, I know, you've once again been proven dead wrong, so you'll resort to childish name calling, then low life comments about me, my wife and my kids..... You have a wife and kids? I'd pay money to see that family portrait. How much? I've got a lovely wife and two lovely kids. Why would you think any different? Or are you STILL posting in ignorance? An a/c return line is warmer than ambient? Now that's ignorant. LOL! |
Wanted: Large Boat
Sam wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message ps.com... Sam wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message ps.com... So, there you go Bill.....thanks for playing. I know, I know, you've once again been proven dead wrong, so you'll resort to childish name calling, then low life comments about me, my wife and my kids..... You have a wife and kids? I'd pay money to see that family portrait. How much? I've got a lovely wife and two lovely kids. Why would you think any different? Or are you STILL posting in ignorance? An a/c return line is warmer than ambient? Now that's ignorant. LOL! Care to answer my questions, or are you too scared? |
Wanted: Large Boat
"basskisser" wrote in message ups.com... Sam wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message ps.com... Sam wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message ps.com... So, there you go Bill.....thanks for playing. I know, I know, you've once again been proven dead wrong, so you'll resort to childish name calling, then low life comments about me, my wife and my kids..... You have a wife and kids? I'd pay money to see that family portrait. How much? I've got a lovely wife and two lovely kids. Why would you think any different? Or are you STILL posting in ignorance? An a/c return line is warmer than ambient? Now that's ignorant. LOL! Care to answer my questions, or are you too scared? Of course I am- you know Karate. LOL! |
Wanted: Large Boat
Sam wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message ups.com... Sam wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message ps.com... Sam wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message ps.com... So, there you go Bill.....thanks for playing. I know, I know, you've once again been proven dead wrong, so you'll resort to childish name calling, then low life comments about me, my wife and my kids..... You have a wife and kids? I'd pay money to see that family portrait. How much? I've got a lovely wife and two lovely kids. Why would you think any different? Or are you STILL posting in ignorance? An a/c return line is warmer than ambient? Now that's ignorant. LOL! Care to answer my questions, or are you too scared? Of course I am- you know Karate. As suspected. I'm just wondering how low you can go.... "The condenser is a long tube that goes back and forth through a multitude of cooling fins, quite similar to the evaporator in structure. The condenser is mounted in front of the radiator to take advantage of the forced air provided by the fan and the motion of the car. As the highly pressurized refrigerant (vapor) flows into the condenser, it gives off heat and warms the condenser. This causes the condenser to be hotter than the forced air coming through the condenser. The condenser hands its heat off to the forced air and turns the refrigerant back into cool liquid in the expansion valve, where it heads back to the evaporator." |
Wanted: Large Boat
"basskisser" wrote in message ups.com... Sam wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message ups.com... Sam wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message ps.com... Sam wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message ps.com... So, there you go Bill.....thanks for playing. I know, I know, you've once again been proven dead wrong, so you'll resort to childish name calling, then low life comments about me, my wife and my kids..... You have a wife and kids? I'd pay money to see that family portrait. How much? I've got a lovely wife and two lovely kids. Why would you think any different? Or are you STILL posting in ignorance? An a/c return line is warmer than ambient? Now that's ignorant. LOL! Care to answer my questions, or are you too scared? Of course I am- you know Karate. As suspected. I'm just wondering how low you can go.... "The condenser is a long tube that goes back and forth through a multitude of cooling fins, quite similar to the evaporator in structure. The condenser is mounted in front of the radiator to take advantage of the forced air provided by the fan and the motion of the car. As the highly pressurized refrigerant (vapor) flows into the condenser, it gives off heat and warms the condenser. This causes the condenser to be hotter than the forced air coming through the condenser. The condenser hands its heat off to the forced air and turns the refrigerant back into cool liquid in the expansion valve, where it heads back to the evaporator." You think the above backs your argument that the return line is warmer than ambient? You can't be that ignorant, can you? |
Wanted: Large Boat
Sam wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message ups.com... Sam wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message ups.com... Sam wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message ps.com... Sam wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message ps.com... So, there you go Bill.....thanks for playing. I know, I know, you've once again been proven dead wrong, so you'll resort to childish name calling, then low life comments about me, my wife and my kids..... You have a wife and kids? I'd pay money to see that family portrait. How much? I've got a lovely wife and two lovely kids. Why would you think any different? Or are you STILL posting in ignorance? An a/c return line is warmer than ambient? Now that's ignorant. LOL! Care to answer my questions, or are you too scared? Of course I am- you know Karate. As suspected. I'm just wondering how low you can go.... "The condenser is a long tube that goes back and forth through a multitude of cooling fins, quite similar to the evaporator in structure. The condenser is mounted in front of the radiator to take advantage of the forced air provided by the fan and the motion of the car. As the highly pressurized refrigerant (vapor) flows into the condenser, it gives off heat and warms the condenser. This causes the condenser to be hotter than the forced air coming through the condenser. The condenser hands its heat off to the forced air and turns the refrigerant back into cool liquid in the expansion valve, where it heads back to the evaporator." You think the above backs your argument that the return line is warmer than ambient? You can't be that ignorant, can you? prove it wrong. I've asked you to do so several times...... still waiting........ |
Wanted: Large Boat
basskisser wrote:
Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Mike wrote: *That* I don't get at all! LOL! Ambiguity in the typewritten word. In case some folks didn't understand the above. It did not mean thatI didn't get (understand) John H's post, in fact I agree with it. It means, that I don't get why people continue to argue with a rockpile like asskisser. Your childish name calling and petty insults shows that you have no credibility, and further more shows that you were indeed not able to "get it", and to cover your tracks, resort to such. Nice try at a big sentence. Didn't work so try again. -- Infatuation....... Infatuation...... It's driving Dan crazy...... It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY....... That's not even a good spin. That's moronic repetition expected of a child. -- Infatuation....... Infatuation...... It's driving Dan crazy...... It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY...... Very sad. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Wanted: Large Boat
basskisser wrote:
Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan wrote: Sure you did. If that's true and your "friend" read your posts, he is as pathetic as you. Seriously. Pathetic because we shared a huge laugh at your expense? Infatuation...... Infatuation..... It's driving Dan crazy.... It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY....... Uhhhh...yeah. That would be extremly pathetic to any reasonable person. -- I guess you are right. Anybody that would give a mentally ill stalker like you a second glance would be pathetic. Read it again - slower this time. Have an adult help you and you might get it. Then again... -- Every single post I make, there you are, my cute little stalker...... Infatuation...... Infatuation...... Please define "every" in your sentence and be as specific as possible. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Wanted: Large Boat
Sam wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message ps.com... Sam wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message roups.com... So, there you go Bill.....thanks for playing. I know, I know, you've once again been proven dead wrong, so you'll resort to childish name calling, then low life comments about me, my wife and my kids..... You have a wife and kids? I'd pay money to see that family portrait. How much? I've got a lovely wife and two lovely kids. Why would you think any different? Or are you STILL posting in ignorance? An a/c return line is warmer than ambient? Now that's ignorant. LOL! Schnapps = whiskey, that is ignorant "Cow Down" that is ignorant "What to hell" that is ignorant. |
Wanted: Large Boat
Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan wrote: Sure you did. If that's true and your "friend" read your posts, he is as pathetic as you. Seriously. Pathetic because we shared a huge laugh at your expense? Infatuation...... Infatuation..... It's driving Dan crazy.... It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY....... Uhhhh...yeah. That would be extremly pathetic to any reasonable person. -- I guess you are right. Anybody that would give a mentally ill stalker like you a second glance would be pathetic. Read it again - slower this time. Have an adult help you and you might get it. Then again... -- Every single post I make, there you are, my cute little stalker...... Infatuation...... Infatuation...... Please define "every" in your sentence and be as specific as possible. eve·ry /ˈɛvri/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[ev-ree] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation –adjective 1. being one of a group or series taken collectively; each: We go there every day. 2. all possible; the greatest possible degree of: every prospect of success. —Idioms3. every bit, in every respect; completely: This is every bit as good as she says it is. 4. every now and then, on occasion; from time to time: She bakes her own bread every now and then. Also, every once in a while, every so often. 5. every other, every second; every alternate: milk deliveries every other day. 6. every which way, in all directions; in disorganized fashion: I brushed against the table, and the cards fell every which way. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [Origin: 1125–75; ME every, everich, OE ǣfre ǣlc ever each] —Synonyms 1. See each. Infatuation....... Infatuation....... It's driving Dan crazy....... It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY....... |
Wanted: Large Boat
Duke Nukem wrote: On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 07:28:56 -0500, animal wrote: Schnapps = whiskey, I was always under the impression that schnapps is the generic term for clear brandies distilled from fermented fruits. Brandy is made from grape wine and some is made from the fermented juices of fruits other than grapes. It's a post fermentation process. Single malt whiskey is made from malted barley, with no other grain products or other fermentables. Blended whiskeys are self explanatory. So with that in mind, how is schnapps whiskey? Or am I late to the party? Late, Tom. I've already told and shown the nitwits why. |
Wanted: Large Boat
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 12:52:08 GMT, Duke Nukem
wrote: On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 07:28:56 -0500, animal wrote: Schnapps = whiskey, I was always under the impression that schnapps is the generic term for clear brandies distilled from fermented fruits. Brandy is made from grape wine and some is made from the fermented juices of fruits other than grapes. It's a post fermentation process. Single malt whiskey is made from malted barley, with no other grain products or other fermentables. Blended whiskeys are self explanatory. So with that in mind, how is schnapps whiskey? Or am I late to the party? Yes, very. This was a discussion between basskisser and a few others many months ago. You don't want to start it up again! |
Wanted: Large Boat
"basskisser" wrote in message ups.com... Sam wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message ups.com... Sam wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message ups.com... Sam wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message ps.com... Sam wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message ps.com... So, there you go Bill.....thanks for playing. I know, I know, you've once again been proven dead wrong, so you'll resort to childish name calling, then low life comments about me, my wife and my kids..... You have a wife and kids? I'd pay money to see that family portrait. How much? I've got a lovely wife and two lovely kids. Why would you think any different? Or are you STILL posting in ignorance? An a/c return line is warmer than ambient? Now that's ignorant. LOL! Care to answer my questions, or are you too scared? Of course I am- you know Karate. As suspected. I'm just wondering how low you can go.... "The condenser is a long tube that goes back and forth through a multitude of cooling fins, quite similar to the evaporator in structure. The condenser is mounted in front of the radiator to take advantage of the forced air provided by the fan and the motion of the car. As the highly pressurized refrigerant (vapor) flows into the condenser, it gives off heat and warms the condenser. This causes the condenser to be hotter than the forced air coming through the condenser. The condenser hands its heat off to the forced air and turns the refrigerant back into cool liquid in the expansion valve, where it heads back to the evaporator." You think the above backs your argument that the return line is warmer than ambient? You can't be that ignorant, can you? prove it wrong. I've asked you to do so several times...... still waiting........ Ok, we'll start off easy. Question #1 (Yes or No only) The return line of an A/C system is the lower pressure side of the system. |
Wanted: Large Boat
"Duke Nukem" wrote in message ... On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 07:28:56 -0500, animal wrote: Schnapps = whiskey, I was always under the impression that schnapps is the generic term for clear brandies distilled from fermented fruits. Schnapps usually gives me the schnitts. -W |
Wanted: Large Boat
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 11:11:31 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: On 12/20/2006 10:59 AM, Clams Canino wrote: "Duke Nukem" wrote in message ... On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 07:28:56 -0500, animal wrote: Schnapps = whiskey, I was always under the impression that schnapps is the generic term for clear brandies distilled from fermented fruits. Schnapps usually gives me the schnitts. When I lived in Jax, I used to go fishing with a bunch of guys, several of whom would drop shot glasses of schnapps into mugs of beer. Those guys were usually out cold before we got 10 miles from shore. My maternal Grandfather had this afternoon routine which, in retrospect, probably kept him alive and vital. When he got home from the foundry, he stopped at the bar down the street from his house and ordered a Pabst Blue Ribbon. He'd drink that talking with his bar buddies, then would order another with a double shot of Jameson Irish which he would promptly pour into the glass of beer, drink that, then go home. He did that everyday of his working and retired life. He lived to be 101. :) Sounds like a combination of moderation and commaderie kept him going. I wish I could enjoy 2 or 3 beers, but I just get too sleepy after one beer to really enjoy it. |
Wanted: Large Boat
"Sam" wrote in message news:xGcih.2598$Jb6.2333@trnddc03... prove it wrong. I've asked you to do so several times...... still waiting........ Ok, we'll start off easy. Question #1 (Yes or No only) The return line of an A/C system is the lower pressure side of the system. Is this question too complicated for you? |
Wanted: Large Boat
basskisser wrote:
Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan wrote: Sure you did. If that's true and your "friend" read your posts, he is as pathetic as you. Seriously. Pathetic because we shared a huge laugh at your expense? Infatuation...... Infatuation..... It's driving Dan crazy.... It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY....... Uhhhh...yeah. That would be extremly pathetic to any reasonable person. -- I guess you are right. Anybody that would give a mentally ill stalker like you a second glance would be pathetic. Read it again - slower this time. Have an adult help you and you might get it. Then again... -- Every single post I make, there you are, my cute little stalker...... Infatuation...... Infatuation...... Please define "every" in your sentence and be as specific as possible. eve·ry /ˈɛvri/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[ev-ree] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation –adjective 1. being one of a group or series taken collectively; each: We go there every day. 2. all possible; the greatest possible degree of: every prospect of success. —Idioms3. every bit, in every respect; completely: This is every bit as good as she says it is. 4. every now and then, on occasion; from time to time: She bakes her own bread every now and then. Also, every once in a while, every so often. 5. every other, every second; every alternate: milk deliveries every other day. 6. every which way, in all directions; in disorganized fashion: I brushed against the table, and the cards fell every which way. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [Origin: 1125–75; ME every, everich, OE ǣfre ǣlc ever each] —Synonyms 1. See each. Infatuation....... Infatuation....... It's driving Dan crazy....... It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY....... That should work. Thanks. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Wanted: Large Boat
Duke Nukem wrote:
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 07:28:56 -0500, animal wrote: Schnapps = whiskey, I was always under the impression that schnapps is the generic term for clear brandies distilled from fermented fruits. Brandy is made from grape wine and some is made from the fermented juices of fruits other than grapes. It's a post fermentation process. Single malt whiskey is made from malted barley, with no other grain products or other fermentables. Blended whiskeys are self explanatory. So with that in mind, how is schnapps whiskey? Or am I late to the party? Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension problem......insisting that schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey requires being aged in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never comprehend. |
Wanted: Large Boat
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:44:27 -0500, animal wrote:
Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension problem......insisting that schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey requires being aged in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never comprehend. Same as last time, animal. Please don't agitate basskisser. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* |
Wanted: Large Boat
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:55:14 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: On 12/21/2006 7:12 AM, JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:44:27 -0500, animal wrote: Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension problem......insisting that schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey requires being aged in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never comprehend. Same as last time, animal. Please don't agitate basskisser. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Facilitating again, eh? Perhaps you can explain how a request to stop agitating is facilitating anything other than the cessation of basskisser agitation. -- ****Happy Chanuka**** John H |
Wanted: Large Boat
JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:55:14 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: On 12/21/2006 7:12 AM, JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:44:27 -0500, animal wrote: Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension problem......insisting that schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey requires being aged in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never comprehend. Same as last time, animal. Please don't agitate basskisser. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Facilitating again, eh? Perhaps you can explain how a request to stop agitating is facilitating anything other than the cessation of basskisser agitation. -- ****Happy Chanuka**** John H Perhaps if YOU'd STFU. |
Wanted: Large Boat
basskisser wrote:
JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:55:14 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: On 12/21/2006 7:12 AM, JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:44:27 -0500, animal wrote: Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension problem......insisting that schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey requires being aged in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never comprehend. Same as last time, animal. Please don't agitate basskisser. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Facilitating again, eh? Perhaps you can explain how a request to stop agitating is facilitating anything other than the cessation of basskisser agitation. -- ****Happy Chanuka**** John H Perhaps if YOU'd STFU. better yet... he should directly take the offenders to task in a meaningful way... not a 'wink, wink, nudge nudge... leave the poor kid alone' routine. |
Wanted: Large Boat
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 20:09:43 GMT, Don White wrote:
basskisser wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:55:14 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: On 12/21/2006 7:12 AM, JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:44:27 -0500, animal wrote: Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension problem......insisting that schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey requires being aged in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never comprehend. Same as last time, animal. Please don't agitate basskisser. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Facilitating again, eh? Perhaps you can explain how a request to stop agitating is facilitating anything other than the cessation of basskisser agitation. -- ****Happy Chanuka**** John H Perhaps if YOU'd STFU. better yet... he should directly take the offenders to task in a meaningful way... not a 'wink, wink, nudge nudge... leave the poor kid alone' routine. How would you have it done, Don? A simple request isn't good enough, I take it. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* |
Wanted: Large Boat
Don White wrote: basskisser wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:55:14 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: On 12/21/2006 7:12 AM, JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:44:27 -0500, animal wrote: Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension problem......insisting that schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey requires being aged in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never comprehend. Same as last time, animal. Please don't agitate basskisser. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Facilitating again, eh? Perhaps you can explain how a request to stop agitating is facilitating anything other than the cessation of basskisser agitation. -- ****Happy Chanuka**** John H Perhaps if YOU'd STFU. better yet... he should directly take the offenders to task in a meaningful way... not a 'wink, wink, nudge nudge... leave the poor kid alone' routine. He's stirring the pot, just trying to cause trouble, while ACTING like he is trying to better the newsgroup. Reggie = JohnH. |
Wanted: Large Boat
JohnH wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 20:09:43 GMT, Don White wrote: basskisser wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:55:14 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: On 12/21/2006 7:12 AM, JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:44:27 -0500, animal wrote: Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension problem......insisting that schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey requires being aged in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never comprehend. Same as last time, animal. Please don't agitate basskisser. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Facilitating again, eh? Perhaps you can explain how a request to stop agitating is facilitating anything other than the cessation of basskisser agitation. -- ****Happy Chanuka**** John H Perhaps if YOU'd STFU. better yet... he should directly take the offenders to task in a meaningful way... not a 'wink, wink, nudge nudge... leave the poor kid alone' routine. How would you have it done, Don? A simple request isn't good enough, I take it. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Talk to the Dans, the Calif Bills, the Jack Goffs etc like you talk to me, Harry or Basskisser. That should do it. |
Wanted: Large Boat
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 21:09:30 GMT, Don White wrote:
JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 20:09:43 GMT, Don White wrote: basskisser wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:55:14 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: On 12/21/2006 7:12 AM, JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:44:27 -0500, animal wrote: Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension problem......insisting that schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey requires being aged in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never comprehend. Same as last time, animal. Please don't agitate basskisser. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Facilitating again, eh? Perhaps you can explain how a request to stop agitating is facilitating anything other than the cessation of basskisser agitation. -- ****Happy Chanuka**** John H Perhaps if YOU'd STFU. better yet... he should directly take the offenders to task in a meaningful way... not a 'wink, wink, nudge nudge... leave the poor kid alone' routine. How would you have it done, Don? A simple request isn't good enough, I take it. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Talk to the Dans, the Calif Bills, the Jack Goffs etc like you talk to me, Harry or Basskisser. That should do it. The problem with that idea is that they haven't called me any names lately and they don't puppy-dog each other. But, if you'll provide me with an example, I'll do my best. Have I said something offensive to you or Harry lately? Gosh, I hope not. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* |
Wanted: Large Boat
"Don White" wrote in message ... JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 20:09:43 GMT, Don White wrote: basskisser wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:55:14 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: On 12/21/2006 7:12 AM, JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:44:27 -0500, animal wrote: Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension problem......insisting that schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey requires being aged in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never comprehend. Same as last time, animal. Please don't agitate basskisser. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Facilitating again, eh? Perhaps you can explain how a request to stop agitating is facilitating anything other than the cessation of basskisser agitation. -- ****Happy Chanuka**** John H Perhaps if YOU'd STFU. better yet... he should directly take the offenders to task in a meaningful way... not a 'wink, wink, nudge nudge... leave the poor kid alone' routine. How would you have it done, Don? A simple request isn't good enough, I take it. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Talk to the Dans, the Calif Bills, the Jack Goffs etc like you talk to me, Harry or Basskisser. That should do it. You must have been one of those government employee's everybody talks about. Incompetent. Can not even read. John does try to control me and the Dan's. But we are semi-uncontrollable. Only SWBO can control. |
Wanted: Large Boat
Calif Bill wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message ... JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 20:09:43 GMT, Don White wrote: basskisser wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:55:14 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: On 12/21/2006 7:12 AM, JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:44:27 -0500, animal wrote: Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension problem......insisting that schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey requires being aged in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never comprehend. Same as last time, animal. Please don't agitate basskisser. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Facilitating again, eh? Perhaps you can explain how a request to stop agitating is facilitating anything other than the cessation of basskisser agitation. -- ****Happy Chanuka**** John H Perhaps if YOU'd STFU. better yet... he should directly take the offenders to task in a meaningful way... not a 'wink, wink, nudge nudge... leave the poor kid alone' routine. How would you have it done, Don? A simple request isn't good enough, I take it. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Talk to the Dans, the Calif Bills, the Jack Goffs etc like you talk to me, Harry or Basskisser. That should do it. You must have been one of those government employee's everybody talks about. Incompetent. Can not even read. John does try to control me and the Dan's. But we are semi-uncontrollable. Only *SWBO* can control. This former 'Crown Corporation' employee would guess that you must mean *SWMBO*. You probably failed the qualification test for civil servant jobs. |
Wanted: Large Boat
"Don White" wrote in message ... Calif Bill wrote: "Don White" wrote in message ... JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 20:09:43 GMT, Don White wrote: basskisser wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:55:14 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: On 12/21/2006 7:12 AM, JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:44:27 -0500, animal wrote: Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension problem......insisting that schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey requires being aged in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never comprehend. Same as last time, animal. Please don't agitate basskisser. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Facilitating again, eh? Perhaps you can explain how a request to stop agitating is facilitating anything other than the cessation of basskisser agitation. -- ****Happy Chanuka**** John H Perhaps if YOU'd STFU. better yet... he should directly take the offenders to task in a meaningful way... not a 'wink, wink, nudge nudge... leave the poor kid alone' routine. How would you have it done, Don? A simple request isn't good enough, I take it. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Talk to the Dans, the Calif Bills, the Jack Goffs etc like you talk to me, Harry or Basskisser. That should do it. You must have been one of those government employee's everybody talks about. Incompetent. Can not even read. John does try to control me and the Dan's. But we are semi-uncontrollable. Only *SWBO* can control. This former 'Crown Corporation' employee would guess that you must mean *SWMBO*. You probably failed the qualification test for civil servant jobs. Never took the test. Went to work in the high tech computer world when I was 19, and company paid for my degree. Then spent a lot of years in the high paid Silicon Valley. So I get to have a nice truck, nice house, and nice boat. |
Wanted: Large Boat
Calif Bill wrote: "Don White" wrote in message ... JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 20:09:43 GMT, Don White wrote: basskisser wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:55:14 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: On 12/21/2006 7:12 AM, JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:44:27 -0500, animal wrote: Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension problem......insisting that schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey requires being aged in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never comprehend. Same as last time, animal. Please don't agitate basskisser. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Facilitating again, eh? Perhaps you can explain how a request to stop agitating is facilitating anything other than the cessation of basskisser agitation. -- ****Happy Chanuka**** John H Perhaps if YOU'd STFU. better yet... he should directly take the offenders to task in a meaningful way... not a 'wink, wink, nudge nudge... leave the poor kid alone' routine. How would you have it done, Don? A simple request isn't good enough, I take it. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Talk to the Dans, the Calif Bills, the Jack Goffs etc like you talk to me, Harry or Basskisser. That should do it. You must have been one of those government employee's everybody talks about. Incompetent. Can not even read. John does try to control me and the Dan's. But we are semi-uncontrollable. Only SWBO can control. BWAAAHAAAA!!!! And John just said that you guys don't "puppy dog" each other!!!! Were you a government employee, Bill? What about THIS sentence: John does try to control me and the Dan's. |
Wanted: Large Boat
basskisser wrote:
Calif Bill wrote: "Don White" wrote in message ... JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 20:09:43 GMT, Don White wrote: basskisser wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:55:14 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: On 12/21/2006 7:12 AM, JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:44:27 -0500, animal wrote: Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension problem......insisting that schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey requires being aged in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never comprehend. Same as last time, animal. Please don't agitate basskisser. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Facilitating again, eh? Perhaps you can explain how a request to stop agitating is facilitating anything other than the cessation of basskisser agitation. -- ****Happy Chanuka**** John H Perhaps if YOU'd STFU. better yet... he should directly take the offenders to task in a meaningful way... not a 'wink, wink, nudge nudge... leave the poor kid alone' routine. How would you have it done, Don? A simple request isn't good enough, I take it. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Talk to the Dans, the Calif Bills, the Jack Goffs etc like you talk to me, Harry or Basskisser. That should do it. You must have been one of those government employee's everybody talks about. Incompetent. Can not even read. John does try to control me and the Dan's. But we are semi-uncontrollable. Only SWBO can control. BWAAAHAAAA!!!! And John just said that you guys don't "puppy dog" each other!!!! Were you a government employee, Bill? What about THIS sentence: John does try to control me and the Dan's. First - "BWAAAA!!" does nothing for your credibility - or anything else you post with more than one exclamation point. It makes you appear like a younger child than you are. Second - The rest of your paragraph is a disaster. Are you so wound up that you can't control yourself long enough to get your point across in two different statements? -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Wanted: Large Boat
Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "Don White" wrote in message ... JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 20:09:43 GMT, Don White wrote: basskisser wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:55:14 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: On 12/21/2006 7:12 AM, JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:44:27 -0500, animal wrote: Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension problem......insisting that schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey requires being aged in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never comprehend. Same as last time, animal. Please don't agitate basskisser. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Facilitating again, eh? Perhaps you can explain how a request to stop agitating is facilitating anything other than the cessation of basskisser agitation. -- ****Happy Chanuka**** John H Perhaps if YOU'd STFU. better yet... he should directly take the offenders to task in a meaningful way... not a 'wink, wink, nudge nudge... leave the poor kid alone' routine. How would you have it done, Don? A simple request isn't good enough, I take it. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Talk to the Dans, the Calif Bills, the Jack Goffs etc like you talk to me, Harry or Basskisser. That should do it. You must have been one of those government employee's everybody talks about. Incompetent. Can not even read. John does try to control me and the Dan's. But we are semi-uncontrollable. Only SWBO can control. BWAAAHAAAA!!!! And John just said that you guys don't "puppy dog" each other!!!! Were you a government employee, Bill? What about THIS sentence: John does try to control me and the Dan's. First - "BWAAAA!!" does nothing for your credibility - or anything else you post with more than one exclamation point. It makes you appear like a younger child than you are. Second - The rest of your paragraph is a disaster. Are you so wound up that you can't control yourself long enough to get your point across in two different statements? Awe.....how cute! I apparently got my point across quite well, Ms. Grammer. |
Wanted: Large Boat
basskisser wrote:
Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "Don White" wrote in message ... JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 20:09:43 GMT, Don White wrote: basskisser wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:55:14 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: On 12/21/2006 7:12 AM, JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:44:27 -0500, animal wrote: Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension problem......insisting that schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey requires being aged in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never comprehend. Same as last time, animal. Please don't agitate basskisser. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Facilitating again, eh? Perhaps you can explain how a request to stop agitating is facilitating anything other than the cessation of basskisser agitation. -- ****Happy Chanuka**** John H Perhaps if YOU'd STFU. better yet... he should directly take the offenders to task in a meaningful way... not a 'wink, wink, nudge nudge... leave the poor kid alone' routine. How would you have it done, Don? A simple request isn't good enough, I take it. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Talk to the Dans, the Calif Bills, the Jack Goffs etc like you talk to me, Harry or Basskisser. That should do it. You must have been one of those government employee's everybody talks about. Incompetent. Can not even read. John does try to control me and the Dan's. But we are semi-uncontrollable. Only SWBO can control. BWAAAHAAAA!!!! And John just said that you guys don't "puppy dog" each other!!!! Were you a government employee, Bill? What about THIS sentence: John does try to control me and the Dan's. First - "BWAAAA!!" does nothing for your credibility - or anything else you post with more than one exclamation point. It makes you appear like a younger child than you are. Second - The rest of your paragraph is a disaster. Are you so wound up that you can't control yourself long enough to get your point across in two different statements? Awe.....how cute! I apparently got my point across quite well, Ms. Grammer. Sad, but typical response. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Wanted: Large Boat
Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "Don White" wrote in message ... JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 20:09:43 GMT, Don White wrote: basskisser wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:55:14 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: On 12/21/2006 7:12 AM, JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:44:27 -0500, animal wrote: Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension problem......insisting that schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey requires being aged in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never comprehend. Same as last time, animal. Please don't agitate basskisser. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Facilitating again, eh? Perhaps you can explain how a request to stop agitating is facilitating anything other than the cessation of basskisser agitation. -- ****Happy Chanuka**** John H Perhaps if YOU'd STFU. better yet... he should directly take the offenders to task in a meaningful way... not a 'wink, wink, nudge nudge... leave the poor kid alone' routine. How would you have it done, Don? A simple request isn't good enough, I take it. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Talk to the Dans, the Calif Bills, the Jack Goffs etc like you talk to me, Harry or Basskisser. That should do it. You must have been one of those government employee's everybody talks about. Incompetent. Can not even read. John does try to control me and the Dan's. But we are semi-uncontrollable. Only SWBO can control. BWAAAHAAAA!!!! And John just said that you guys don't "puppy dog" each other!!!! Were you a government employee, Bill? What about THIS sentence: John does try to control me and the Dan's. First - "BWAAAA!!" does nothing for your credibility - or anything else you post with more than one exclamation point. It makes you appear like a younger child than you are. Second - The rest of your paragraph is a disaster. Are you so wound up that you can't control yourself long enough to get your point across in two different statements? Awe.....how cute! I apparently got my point across quite well, Ms. Grammer. Sad, but typical response. Yes, I know it probably makes you sad that I won't give into your advances, stalker. |
Wanted: Large Boat
On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 19:35:10 -0500, Dan
wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan wrote: basskisser wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "Don White" wrote in message ... JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 20:09:43 GMT, Don White wrote: basskisser wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:55:14 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: On 12/21/2006 7:12 AM, JohnH wrote: On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:44:27 -0500, animal wrote: Yeah, Kevin has a reading comprehension problem......insisting that schnapps was whiskey despite the fact that whiskey requires being aged in oak barrels.....a simple fact kevin could never comprehend. Same as last time, animal. Please don't agitate basskisser. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Facilitating again, eh? Perhaps you can explain how a request to stop agitating is facilitating anything other than the cessation of basskisser agitation. -- ****Happy Chanuka**** John H Perhaps if YOU'd STFU. better yet... he should directly take the offenders to task in a meaningful way... not a 'wink, wink, nudge nudge... leave the poor kid alone' routine. How would you have it done, Don? A simple request isn't good enough, I take it. -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* Talk to the Dans, the Calif Bills, the Jack Goffs etc like you talk to me, Harry or Basskisser. That should do it. You must have been one of those government employee's everybody talks about. Incompetent. Can not even read. John does try to control me and the Dan's. But we are semi-uncontrollable. Only SWBO can control. BWAAAHAAAA!!!! And John just said that you guys don't "puppy dog" each other!!!! Were you a government employee, Bill? What about THIS sentence: John does try to control me and the Dan's. First - "BWAAAA!!" does nothing for your credibility - or anything else you post with more than one exclamation point. It makes you appear like a younger child than you are. Second - The rest of your paragraph is a disaster. Are you so wound up that you can't control yourself long enough to get your point across in two different statements? Awe.....how cute! I apparently got my point across quite well, Ms. Grammer. Sad, but typical response. Dan, have I asked you nicely to please stop agitating basskisser? It would please almost everyone in the group to no end. Thanks! -- John H *Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!* |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:33 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com