"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Sam wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Uh, where did I EVER say that? Are you having reading comprehension
problems?

Here is again-

" So, you do realize that that water, in order to cool with any
noticeable
amount, would be quite warm, usually warmer than the ambient air
temperature, don't you?"


I'd STILL like to know, however, how, if you are flowing equal amounts
of water at equal temps., how the ice chest will make it more
effective.

Who said that?

You did. I said that it would make no difference whether the ice was in
an ice chest or in a cardboard box.


*I* said it makes a difference while the ice/water is below ambient and
makes no difference at ambient.
*You* said it makes no difference regardless of ice/water temp.

You said I was wrong.

You are.

LOL!

Sam wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Sam wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Uh, where did I EVER say that? Are you having reading comprehension
problems?

Here is again-

" So, you do realize that that water, in order to cool with any
noticeable
amount, would be quite warm, usually warmer than the ambient air
temperature, don't you?"


I'd STILL like to know, however, how, if you are flowing equal amounts
of water at equal temps., how the ice chest will make it more
effective.

Who said that?

You did. I said that it would make no difference whether the ice was in
an ice chest or in a cardboard box.


*I* said it makes a difference while the ice/water is below ambient and
makes no difference at ambient.
*You* said it makes no difference regardless of ice/water temp.

You said I was wrong.

You are.

LOL!

Holy ****! Are you really that bad at reading comprehension???
Okay, here's an easy one. Show me one bit of proof that the machine
would be more effective with the ice in a chest as opposed to a
cardboard box.

"basskisser" wrote in message
ps.com...

Sam wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Sam wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Uh, where did I EVER say that? Are you having reading comprehension
problems?

Here is again-

" So, you do realize that that water, in order to cool with any
noticeable
amount, would be quite warm, usually warmer than the ambient air
temperature, don't you?"


I'd STILL like to know, however, how, if you are flowing equal
amounts
of water at equal temps., how the ice chest will make it more
effective.

Who said that?

You did. I said that it would make no difference whether the ice was in
an ice chest or in a cardboard box.


*I* said it makes a difference while the ice/water is below ambient and
makes no difference at ambient.
*You* said it makes no difference regardless of ice/water temp.

You said I was wrong.

You are.

LOL!

Holy ****! Are you really that bad at reading comprehension???
Okay, here's an easy one. Show me one bit of proof that the machine
would be more effective with the ice in a chest as opposed to a
cardboard box.


LOL!

basskisser wrote:
Sam wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...
Sam wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Uh, where did I EVER say that? Are you having reading comprehension
problems?
Here is again-

" So, you do realize that that water, in order to cool with any
noticeable
amount, would be quite warm, usually warmer than the ambient air
temperature, don't you?"


I'd STILL like to know, however, how, if you are flowing equal amounts
of water at equal temps., how the ice chest will make it more
effective.
Who said that?
You did. I said that it would make no difference whether the ice was in
an ice chest or in a cardboard box.

*I* said it makes a difference while the ice/water is below ambient and
makes no difference at ambient.
*You* said it makes no difference regardless of ice/water temp.

You said I was wrong.
You are.

LOL!

Holy ****! Are you really that bad at reading comprehension???
Okay, here's an easy one. Show me one bit of proof that the machine
would be more effective with the ice in a chest as opposed to a
cardboard box.

Bassy,
Have you ever noticed that everyone you debate has reading comprehension
skills? That everyone you debate are as ignorant as can be? I don't
believe anyone in rec.boats has ever been able to follow one of your
arguments, and I really can't remember anyone saying, "You know Bassy, I
think you are correct in this matter". I know there are many people who
agree with you on certain issues, but no one ever supported you in any
of your diatribes. Why is that?

Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Sam wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...
Sam wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Uh, where did I EVER say that? Are you having reading comprehension
problems?
Here is again-

" So, you do realize that that water, in order to cool with any
noticeable
amount, would be quite warm, usually warmer than the ambient air
temperature, don't you?"


I'd STILL like to know, however, how, if you are flowing equal amounts
of water at equal temps., how the ice chest will make it more
effective.
Who said that?
You did. I said that it would make no difference whether the ice was in
an ice chest or in a cardboard box.

*I* said it makes a difference while the ice/water is below ambient and
makes no difference at ambient.
*You* said it makes no difference regardless of ice/water temp.

You said I was wrong.
You are.

LOL!

Holy ****! Are you really that bad at reading comprehension???
Okay, here's an easy one. Show me one bit of proof that the machine
would be more effective with the ice in a chest as opposed to a
cardboard box.

Bassy,
Have you ever noticed that everyone you debate has reading comprehension
skills? That everyone you debate are as ignorant as can be? I don't
believe anyone in rec.boats has ever been able to follow one of your
arguments, and I really can't remember anyone saying, "You know Bassy, I
think you are correct in this matter". I know there are many people who
agree with you on certain issues, but no one ever supported you in any
of your diatribes. Why is that?

Sure they do. It's just that YOUR club doesn't, and will go to any
length to try and make me look wrong. I can supply information beyond
belief, give clear and concise articles to back me up, and on and on,
then when my point is proved beyond anyone's REASONABLE doubt, the name
calling and insults begins. As far as the above goes, I've stated that
the machine wouldn't be anymore effective with the ice in an ice chest
or in a cardboard box, because the water flowing across the ice would
melt the ice at the same rate. Then Sam started that childish name
calling. And STILL hasn't shown anything to the contrary.

"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Sure they do. It's just that YOUR club doesn't, and will go to any
length to try and make me look wrong. I can supply information beyond
belief, give clear and concise articles to back me up, and on and on,
then when my point is proved beyond anyone's REASONABLE doubt, the name
calling and insults begins. As far as the above goes, I've stated that
the machine wouldn't be anymore effective with the ice in an ice chest
or in a cardboard box, because the water flowing across the ice would
melt the ice at the same rate. Then Sam started that childish name
calling. And STILL hasn't shown anything to the contrary.

LOL!

basskisser wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Sam wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...
Sam wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Uh, where did I EVER say that? Are you having reading comprehension
problems?
Here is again-

" So, you do realize that that water, in order to cool with any
noticeable
amount, would be quite warm, usually warmer than the ambient air
temperature, don't you?"


I'd STILL like to know, however, how, if you are flowing equal amounts
of water at equal temps., how the ice chest will make it more
effective.
Who said that?
You did. I said that it would make no difference whether the ice was in
an ice chest or in a cardboard box.
*I* said it makes a difference while the ice/water is below ambient and
makes no difference at ambient.
*You* said it makes no difference regardless of ice/water temp.

You said I was wrong.
You are.

LOL!
Holy ****! Are you really that bad at reading comprehension???
Okay, here's an easy one. Show me one bit of proof that the machine
would be more effective with the ice in a chest as opposed to a
cardboard box.

Bassy,
Have you ever noticed that everyone you debate has reading comprehension
skills? That everyone you debate are as ignorant as can be? I don't
believe anyone in rec.boats has ever been able to follow one of your
arguments, and I really can't remember anyone saying, "You know Bassy, I
think you are correct in this matter". I know there are many people who
agree with you on certain issues, but no one ever supported you in any
of your diatribes. Why is that?

Sure they do. It's just that YOUR club doesn't, and will go to any
length to try and make me look wrong. I can supply information beyond
belief, give clear and concise articles to back me up, and on and on,
then when my point is proved beyond anyone's REASONABLE doubt, the name
calling and insults begins. As far as the above goes, I've stated that
the machine wouldn't be anymore effective with the ice in an ice chest
or in a cardboard box, because the water flowing across the ice would
melt the ice at the same rate. Then Sam started that childish name
calling. And STILL hasn't shown anything to the contrary.


I don't have a club, but if you were honest with yourself, you would
realize that NO ONE support you or your diatribes. People who agree
with everything you believe in, take off running when they see you start
another one of your silly threads. Harry who is a liberal as can be
even has told you that your diatribes were boring and stupid.

Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:

basskisser wrote:

Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:

basskisser wrote:

Sam wrote:

"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Sam wrote:

"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Uh, where did I EVER say that? Are you having reading comprehension
problems?

Here is again-

" So, you do realize that that water, in order to cool with any
noticeable
amount, would be quite warm, usually warmer than the ambient air
temperature, don't you?"


I'd STILL like to know, however, how, if you are flowing equal
amounts
of water at equal temps., how the ice chest will make it more
effective.

Who said that?

You did. I said that it would make no difference whether the ice
was in
an ice chest or in a cardboard box.

*I* said it makes a difference while the ice/water is below ambient
and
makes no difference at ambient.
*You* said it makes no difference regardless of ice/water temp.

You said I was wrong.

You are.

LOL!

Holy ****! Are you really that bad at reading comprehension???
Okay, here's an easy one. Show me one bit of proof that the machine
would be more effective with the ice in a chest as opposed to a
cardboard box.

Bassy,
Have you ever noticed that everyone you debate has reading comprehension
skills? That everyone you debate are as ignorant as can be? I don't
believe anyone in rec.boats has ever been able to follow one of your
arguments, and I really can't remember anyone saying, "You know Bassy, I
think you are correct in this matter". I know there are many people who
agree with you on certain issues, but no one ever supported you in any
of your diatribes. Why is that?


Sure they do. It's just that YOUR club doesn't, and will go to any
length to try and make me look wrong. I can supply information beyond
belief, give clear and concise articles to back me up, and on and on,
then when my point is proved beyond anyone's REASONABLE doubt, the name
calling and insults begins. As far as the above goes, I've stated that
the machine wouldn't be anymore effective with the ice in an ice chest
or in a cardboard box, because the water flowing across the ice would
melt the ice at the same rate. Then Sam started that childish name
calling. And STILL hasn't shown anything to the contrary.


I don't have a club, but if you were honest with yourself, you would
realize that NO ONE support you or your diatribes. People who agree
with everything you believe in, take off running when they see you start
another one of your silly threads. Harry who is a liberal as can be
even has told you that your diatribes were boring and stupid.

Wrong. There's the Don and Harry show. It's a 3-way circle jerk that
the boy leans on whenever it benefits him and is moronic BS.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Dan wrote:

Wrong. There's the Don and Harry show. It's a 3-way circle jerk that
the boy leans on whenever it benefits him and is moronic BS.


"It's often noted that in persons with infatuation disorders, they
often react to rejection with negative feelings toward the very person
they are infatuated with."

Infatuation......
Infatuation....
It's driving Dan crazy.....
It's making Dan CRRRAAAZZZYYY.....

"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...


As far as the above goes, I've stated that
the machine wouldn't be anymore effective with the ice in an ice chest
or in a cardboard box, because the water flowing across the ice would
melt the ice at the same rate. Then Sam started that childish name
calling. And STILL hasn't shown anything to the contrary.


I can prove it to you (yet again) if you agree to answer just a few simple
yes or no questions.

Are you game?