"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
Congratulations - you've managed to fill the newsgroup with crap.

Good job man - damn good job.

Tom, when that thread is collapsed, all I see is one message - the original.
How is this different than any other thread, unless you choose to expand it?

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
Congratulations - you've managed to fill the newsgroup with crap.

Good job man - damn good job.

Tom, when that thread is collapsed, all I see is one message - the
original. How is this different than any other thread, unless you choose
to expand it?


My only complaint is that you perpetuated the crossposting. This NG already
has it's quota of wackos.

Why not confine your discussion to those people in the groups they are
posting to? None of those names are familiar in rec.boats.

The easy answer for me, after getting sick of 100's of crossposting ****ing
contests a day was to block all the names involved .... except yours .... I
enjoy our occasional "discussions" and have some respect for your opinions
..... as incorrect as they usually are. :-)

Eisboch

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
Congratulations - you've managed to fill the newsgroup with crap.

Good job man - damn good job.

Tom, when that thread is collapsed, all I see is one message - the
original. How is this different than any other thread, unless you choose
to expand it?


My only complaint is that you perpetuated the crossposting. This NG
already has it's quota of wackos.

Why not confine your discussion to those people in the groups they are
posting to? None of those names are familiar in rec.boats.

OK - I'll admit to being lazy. It's much easier to just hit the "respond"
keystroke, and NOT edit out the non-relevant newsgroups from the address
line. But, I don't.

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
news
"Eisboch" wrote in message
...


My only complaint is that you perpetuated the crossposting. This NG
already has it's quota of wackos.

Why not confine your discussion to those people in the groups they are
posting to? None of those names are familiar in rec.boats.



OK - I'll admit to being lazy. It's much easier to just hit the "respond"
keystroke, and NOT edit out the non-relevant newsgroups from the address
line. But, I don't.


See? Wrong again.

Eisboch

Eisboch wrote:
My only complaint is that you perpetuated the crossposting. This NG already
has it's quota of wackos.


Kind of left me wondering where the heck they all came from.


Why not confine your discussion to those people in the groups they are
posting to? None of those names are familiar in rec.boats.


And none of them is the least bit interested in boats.

It kind of reminded me of the invasion of the "flonkers" in
another discussion forum. An extremely large number of
people with nothing whatever to say and a heck of a lot of
time to waste trying to say something, anything, just to
hear themselves type.

Fortunately, they all have short attention spans and soon
wander off elsewhere.

DSK

"DSK" wrote in message
.. .
Eisboch wrote:
My only complaint is that you perpetuated the crossposting. This NG
already has it's quota of wackos.


Kind of left me wondering where the heck they all came from.


Why not confine your discussion to those people in the groups they are
posting to? None of those names are familiar in rec.boats.


And none of them is the least bit interested in boats.

It kind of reminded me of the invasion of the "flonkers" in another
discussion forum. An extremely large number of people with nothing
whatever to say and a heck of a lot of time to waste trying to say
something, anything, just to hear themselves type.

Fortunately, they all have short attention spans and soon wander off
elsewhere.

DSK


Hey! What's in this picture? A bicycle? :-)
http://www.usslibertyinquiry.com/

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
Hey! What's in this picture? A bicycle? :-)
http://www.usslibertyinquiry.com/

It appears to be a relatively well set-up web site. Not only
that, it contains this (begine quote)
"...we have set up a discussion forum so that visitors may
express their thoughts on the subjects raised here and
engage in dialogs with other visitors."

So why talk about it *here*? Furthermore, why lure a lot of
argumentative boneheads here? Don't we have enough already,
or were you hoping some of them would stick around to talk
politics?

DSK