Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Getting them interested is not the problem. Getting the money is.
There has been a trend in the federal government that has slowly shifted towards a fee for use mechanism to pay for a lot of federal services. The corp runs the dam and shore operations at Kerr Lake where I have a vacation house. 5 years ago I purchased a 5 year floating dock/vegitation modification permit that allows me to keep a dock on the lake and clear the brush on my piece of the lake shore. The corp sends someone out who basically just looks at where you are proposing to put a dock and a path to the dock and tells you if he likes it or not. Takes about 10 minutes. I paid $50. The 5 years have passed and I got my renewal notice last month. It's $250 now. There is a new "administrative cost" for renewals of $200. It gets better, new dock permits have a $400 "administrative" fee. Gene Kearns wrote: On 19 Nov 2006 14:21:07 -0800, penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: If it was a waterway going into a local marina or park I would say that they needed to chip in but to ask them to pay for dredgeing in an area that is on the intercoastal only they should not have to chip in anything. Maybe if we could get the Corps of Engineers to sit down at Short Sugars in Reidsville and get a good BBQ dinner in them they would think more clearly. That might just work! At least they'd have had pretty decent food.... I had breakfast there this morning! -- Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC. Homepage http://pamandgene.idleplay.net/ Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguide http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Internation Distress Signals | ASA | |||
Automatic distress VHF radios | Cruising | |||
Marine Radios | Electronics | |||
SOS Visual Distress Signal | General | |||
SOS Distress Light Regulations | Cruising |