thunder wrote:
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 21:51:15 -0800, Chuck Gould wrote:


Very few inland waterways, such as Puget Sound, would be at the same
type of risk for tsunami damage as a coastal community or an island.

I wouldn't get too cocky.

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/...tml?source=rss


From the article:

Martin said there's a low likelihood of a tsunami hitting Seattle.
Walsh said a magnitude-7.3 quake would occur, on average, about once in
every 2,500 years.
**

If there's a good chance that I'll live another 2500 years, I'm almost
certain to experience a tsunami in Seattle. :-)

"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
oups.com...

thunder wrote:
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 21:51:15 -0800, Chuck Gould wrote:


Very few inland waterways, such as Puget Sound, would be at the same
type of risk for tsunami damage as a coastal community or an island.

I wouldn't get too cocky.

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/...tml?source=rss


From the article:

Martin said there's a low likelihood of a tsunami hitting Seattle.
Walsh said a magnitude-7.3 quake would occur, on average, about once in
every 2,500 years.
**

If there's a good chance that I'll live another 2500 years, I'm almost
certain to experience a tsunami in Seattle. :-)


Last 7.3 was 2499.9 years ago.