BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   Account of pair's fate at sea chills courtroom (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/75726-account-pairs-fate-sea-chills-courtroom.html)

Nick Hull November 18th 06 02:02 PM

Account of pair's fate at sea chills courtroom
 
In article ,
Phoenix wrote:

No matter how much a person deserves death (and there are many who do),
I'm not willing to give any government the power to make that decision.


Yep, and in the USA the government doesn't have that power. Only the jury
decides if they receive a death sentence or not.


Uh, no, the state and federal governments are consulted on appeal and
every death row inmate files for a stay of execution or a reprieve from
multiple sources who are NOT juries.


But FIRST a jury must deliver the death verdict. IIRC there is no judge
that can initiate a death penalty, he can only read the jury verdict.

--
Free men own guns - www.geocities/CapitolHill/5357/

Scout November 18th 06 02:41 PM

Account of pair's fate at sea chills courtroom
 

"Phoenix" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

"Phoenix" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
In article ,
"tiny dancer" wrote:

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
nk.net...

"comadreja" wrote in message
...
In article
,
Nick Hull wrote:
Nancy Rudins wrote:


There is never closure to losing a family member to murder.
I've
read
of cases in which the family of a murder victim did not want
capital
punishment for the murderer. The family of Ted Bundy's
victims
are
still grieving for their loss. His execution did not bring
"closure"
to the loss.

It's fine with me if the victim and her family don't want
capital
punishment, as long as I don't have to feed, cloth, shelter and
guard
the perp, and as long as the perp can NEVER escape.

You are paying much, much more for appeals to both the State
and
Federal Court for a Capital Punishment case than paying for the
upkeep
and cost for someone with LWOP. The appellate reviews, the State
paid
attorneys for the defendant, State Commission hearings etc.
etc.
etc.

http://janda.org/c10/statisticsnews/NoDeathPenalty.htm

-c

http://www.deathpenalty.org/index.ph...cost&menu=1%22

Main reason I am against the death penalty. . . $$$$$$$$. Rare
that
we
execute someone relative to the amount on death row and all the
extra
costs
related to both the trial and all the appeals afterward.


Which is why I said the appeals process is a farce for somebody like
Deleon,
or Charles Ng, or Richard Allen Davis, or so many MANY of those
convicted of
these atrocious crimes. Crimes where *guilt* is not in doubt what
so
ever.
And where we all saw the *fair trial* process.

There is no reason why the death penalty should be expensive, except
for
the lawyers who profit. If a person is sentenced to death, just take
him out of the courthouse and waste him. I would prefer selling his
organs and giving the money to the victim's family.

Move to China, where the particular fitness and need for a prisoner's
body parts often makes for a speedy execution.



Certainly the system is not perfect and some innocent people will be
killed, but nothing in this world is perfect. Should we outlaw
marriage
because half of them fail?

Does marriage involve killing? Are the effects as irreversible as
death?


The answer to bad verdicts is not endless
appeals but to improve the system to reduce bad verdicts. A court
should be a level playing field; if the same govt pays the judge,
jurors
and prosecutor can you expect acquital if you lack a $million lawyer?
Separation of powers is the answer, our founding fathers knew it but
failed to implement it. See my web page for details.

I don't know WTF you're trying to say here.

The disproportionate number of white perps, who get lighter sentences
for the same crimes, on death row, immediately makes the DP highly
suspect. It's pure circus for the masses, that's all.

Our ominous and powerful state shouldn't be allowed to kill people.
It's amazing that the same people who want less state controls will
hand
over this power to their ultimate in corruption. How can you trust
them
to kill the right person? What, is the State suddenly virtuous when it
allows an execution?

No matter how much a person deserves death (and there are many who do),
I'm not willing to give any government the power to make that decision.


Yep, and in the USA the government doesn't have that power. Only the jury
decides if they receive a death sentence or not.


Uh, no, the state and federal governments are consulted on appeal and
every death row inmate files for a stay of execution or a reprieve from
multiple sources who are NOT juries.


Yep, they remove, delay, or negate a death penality they do NOT impose it.

The State decides if the DP is on the table at trial.


True. However it is the decision of the jury that imposes it and none other.


The State decides
which attorney indigent perps will get to represent them.


Unless the defendant cares to obtain his own attorney, then they can have
anyone that will take their case.

The officers
of the State (not juries) review appeals.


Yep, and all they can do is overturn the DP, they can not impose it.

The Government sure as **** has power over the DP. And they use it
shamelessly to prove what a great old job they are doing for you and me.


And in the end the jury and the jury alone decides if the DP shall be
imposed. As such the government does NOT have that power. The jury does, and
only the jury.



[email protected] November 18th 06 03:44 PM

Account of pair's fate at sea chills courtroom
 
So if a 50 yr old man raped your 12 year old kid for a few weeks would
you tell the judge to spare that person so they can one day be a great
person in our community?


Bo Raxo wrote:
tiny dancer wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la...wed-storylevel
Los Angeles Times
November 9, 2006
Account of pair's fate at sea chills courtroom
An alleged accomplice in the disappearance of a yachting couple out of
O.C. says there were some frantic minutes, then a callous drowning.
By Christine Hanley, Times Staff Writer

Thomas and Jackie Hawks fought their alleged captors to the bitter end
and in a moment of tenderness managed to hold hands before an anchor
dragged them to the bottom of the sea.

Family and friends of the couple were brought to tears Wednesday when a
prosecution witness gave an excruciating, minute-by-minute account of
events aboard their 55-foot yacht, Well Deserved, during the Santa Ana
murder trial of Jennifer L. Deleon.

Deleon, 25, a Long Beach mother of two, is accused of helping her
husband, Skylar, and three other men in a plot to murder the Hawkses,
steal their yacht and plunder their savings. If convicted, she could
get life in prison without parole. Skylar Deleon, the alleged
mastermind, goes on trial in January.

Jennifer Deleon was not on board when the Hawkses were presumably
killed - their bodies haven't been found. But prosecutors say she
used her 9-month-old child to gain the couple's trust and later helped
destroy evidence by cleaning the boat. They reject her defense that she
didn't know what her husband was up to until after the alleged murders,
then followed his lead only because she was afraid of him.

On Wednesday, Alonso Machain, who was on the boat with the couple the
day they disappeared, provided the first eyewitness account of the
alleged crimes, acknowledging that he was hoping for leniency in
exchange for his testimony.

Machain, who is rail-thin and looks much younger than his 23 years,
testified that he met Skylar Deleon at Seal Beach City Jail, when he
was working as a jailer and Deleon was in a work furlough program for
committing home burglary. Machain said Deleon, during his jail stay,
convinced him that he was rich, earning more than $2 million a month
and traveling the world. Machain said he grew to respect and admire
Deleon, and the two became good friends.

In October 2004, Machain said, Skylar Deleon asked him whether he'd
like to make a "few million dollars." At the time, Machain was
unemployed. When Machain asked how he could make that much money
legally, Deleon responded that "it isn't illegal unless you get
caught," Machain said. He said Deleon told him he was routinely
solicited to carry out murders, which he did "on the side."

Deleon told him the Hawkses "were bad" and it would "make the world a
better place if they were taken out," Machain said. After the couple
were killed, he allegedly told Machain, they would get to keep their
boat and anything else they owned.

Machain said Deleon accompanied him to the Lakewood Mall, where they
bought two stun guns, and Machain went alone to another store to buy
two pairs of handcuffs. On a test-sail with the Hawkses on Nov. 6,
2004, Machain was to have overpowered Jackie Hawks while Deleon subdued
her husband. But Machain said Deleon abandoned the plan once they were
all on the boat, for unknown reasons. It was during that outing that
Machain said Deleon first learned that Thomas Hawks was a retired
probation officer "very physically fit for his age."

Back at the docks, Machain said, Deleon called his wife and told her
she had to come down to the boat to meet the Hawkses and make them
"feel more at ease." Within the next week he also decided that a third
person would be needed to help overcome Thomas Hawks.

On the morning of Nov. 15, Machain said, he and Deleon met up with that
person - whose name, he later learned, was John Fitzgerald Kennedy
- before returning to the pier. Once they were headed out to sea, he
said, Jackie Hawks called someone to report that she and her husband
were with the buyers.

Machain said he was standing in the kitchen of the main cabin when
Deleon and Kennedy overpowered Thomas Hawks in a lower area of the boat
near a bedroom. The commotion caused Jackie Hawks to try to move past
Machain, he said, and she screamed, "What's going on?"

With Jackie Hawks cornered in the kitchen, Machain said, he pulled out
his stun gun. "I knew I had to act. I had to overpower Mrs. Hawks. I
struggled with her. She was fighting me."

Eventually he got her handcuffed, he said, and took her down to the
bedroom, where her husband was already handcuffed on the bed. That's
when she asked Deleon, "How could you do this to us? You brought your
wife and kids here. We trusted you."

Machain helped Deleon cover the couple's eyes and mouths with duct tape
as Jackie Hawks cried, saying she didn't want to die and that she
wanted to see her new grandchild. The Hawkses were then taken up to the
main cabin one at a time to sign and fingerprint title transfer
documents. Jackie Hawks was told that if she cooperated she would be
released. "She was shaking uncontrollably," Machain recalled. When it
was her husband's turn, Deleon told him that if he tried anything funny
he would be struck with a Magnum flashlight. Thomas Hawks responded
that he wouldn't try anything, according to Machain.

The couple were brought back to the bedroom while Deleon and Kennedy
prepared the anchor on the aft deck, Machain said. Left to "baby-sit"
them, he watched as Thomas Hawks tried to console his wife.

She was still crying and asking, in a muffled voice through the tape,
why their captors were doing this to them.

"I could see Mr. Hawks trying to reach over and hold her hand and
comfort her," Machain said.

On the deck, the couple were tied together standing, her back to her
husband's chest with their hands still cuffed behind them.

Realizing what was happening, Thomas Hawks kicked Deleon as he tried to
fasten the couple to the anchor, sending him back into a deck chair,
Machain said.

Kennedy responded with a "hard swing" to the husband's right temple.
"It was a pretty hard blow" that left him staggering and making
"slurring noises," Machain said.

He would have fallen to his knees but "Mrs. Hawks was holding him up,"
all the time "screaming, yelling, asking, 'What's going on?' " he
recalled.

Deleon lifted the anchor and threw it overboard as Kennedy pushed the
couple overboard, Machain said.

Deleon then turned the yacht around and the men collected cash, jewelry
and other valuables, Machain said. Kennedy cracked open a beer, grabbed
a fishing rod and fished all the way back to the harbor, he said.



Thanks for the update on this one. Another one of those cases where the
death penalty should be *streamlined*. Once they are found guilty and
sentenced to die, give 'em one appeal and then stick the needle in 'em.
Just *my* opinion, of course.


Yeah, that'll bring the Hawks back to life, right? And make the
streets safer than if Skylar Deleon spends the rest of his life in
prison.

And there is no chance whatsoever that a 25 year old could grow and
change over the next two or three decades, doing good by working with
fellow inmates or convincing young people to not make the mistakes he
did. Like *some* other inmates who committed heinous crimes in their
youth have managed to do.

Nope, you say we might as well throw that life away as garbage. Must
be great to be able to see in to the future and know with such
certainty whether a person will ever be able to change and ever be able
to do any good for his fellow man. I don't know where one finds such
certainty about human nature and the future, but somehow I think it
comes from a place to which I wouldn't want to go.


Bo Raxo



Nancy Rudins November 19th 06 01:25 AM

Account of pair's fate at sea chills courtroom
 
Nick Hull wrote:
In article ,
Nancy Rudins wrote:

Bama Brian wrote:
Nancy Rudins wrote:
Nick Hull wrote:
In article ,
"Beth In Alaska" wrote:

And I'm with Bo on the eye-for-an-eye crap. If we as a society
believe that certain behavior is wrong, then we can't condone it as
a punishment for criminals. We can't rape rapists as punishment, we
can't drive a car into the family of a drunk driver and we can't
kill killers.
Why not? Let the punishment fit the crime. Rape a rapist with a
broom handle until he dies. We should kill killers, preferably the
way they killed their victim. In this case I would advocate concrete
overshoes for the killer, put him chest deep in the water (at low
tide) ;)

Also, it would do good to let the victim's family execute the murderer.


You aren't advocating justice; you describe revenge as a suitable
punishment. Not unlike countries where thieves are punished by
getting their hands chopped off.
Define justice, Nancy.



I'll go by the dictionary definition:

Justice \Jus"tice\ (j[u^]s"t[i^]s), n. [F., fr. L. justitia, fr.


3. The rendering to every one his due or right; just
treatment; requital of desert; merited reward or
punishment; that which is due to one's conduct or motives.
[1913 Webster]


Sounds like an eye for an eye ;)


That's not how I interpreted it.

Kind regards,
Nancy


--
Take a sad song and make it better (lennon/mccartney)
Take bad software and make it better (rudins)
http://www.ncsa.uiuc.edu/People/nrudins

Bo Raxo November 21st 06 02:55 AM

Account of pair's fate at sea chills courtroom
 

wrote:
So if a 50 yr old man raped your 12 year old kid for a few weeks would
you tell the judge to spare that person so they can one day be a great
person in our community?


No. First, rape doesn't get the death penalty except in Lousisiana.
Second, I would tell the judge to spare that person because killing is
wrong.

Now you tell me: if your brother or sister or son or daughter was
arrested for a crime they didn't commit, convicted, and sentenced to
death, would you still support the death penalty? Innocent people are
released from death row every year.

Or how fiscal choices: it is more expensive to follow the judicial
process for the death penalty than it is to lock 'em up for life. Will
you volunteer to chip in an extra thousand dollars a year in taxes to
make up the difference? Will you tell the kids they can't have music
classes or after school sports, that a poor pregnant woman doesn't get
prenatal checkups, so that we can impose the death penalty instead of
life in prison?

Those are real choices, unlike the one you pose.



Bo Raxo wrote:
tiny dancer wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la...wed-storylevel
Los Angeles Times
November 9, 2006
Account of pair's fate at sea chills courtroom
An alleged accomplice in the disappearance of a yachting couple out of
O.C. says there were some frantic minutes, then a callous drowning.
By Christine Hanley, Times Staff Writer

Thomas and Jackie Hawks fought their alleged captors to the bitter end
and in a moment of tenderness managed to hold hands before an anchor
dragged them to the bottom of the sea.

Family and friends of the couple were brought to tears Wednesday when a
prosecution witness gave an excruciating, minute-by-minute account of
events aboard their 55-foot yacht, Well Deserved, during the Santa Ana
murder trial of Jennifer L. Deleon.

Deleon, 25, a Long Beach mother of two, is accused of helping her
husband, Skylar, and three other men in a plot to murder the Hawkses,
steal their yacht and plunder their savings. If convicted, she could
get life in prison without parole. Skylar Deleon, the alleged
mastermind, goes on trial in January.

Jennifer Deleon was not on board when the Hawkses were presumably
killed - their bodies haven't been found. But prosecutors say she
used her 9-month-old child to gain the couple's trust and later helped
destroy evidence by cleaning the boat. They reject her defense that she
didn't know what her husband was up to until after the alleged murders,
then followed his lead only because she was afraid of him.

On Wednesday, Alonso Machain, who was on the boat with the couple the
day they disappeared, provided the first eyewitness account of the
alleged crimes, acknowledging that he was hoping for leniency in
exchange for his testimony.

Machain, who is rail-thin and looks much younger than his 23 years,
testified that he met Skylar Deleon at Seal Beach City Jail, when he
was working as a jailer and Deleon was in a work furlough program for
committing home burglary. Machain said Deleon, during his jail stay,
convinced him that he was rich, earning more than $2 million a month
and traveling the world. Machain said he grew to respect and admire
Deleon, and the two became good friends.

In October 2004, Machain said, Skylar Deleon asked him whether he'd
like to make a "few million dollars." At the time, Machain was
unemployed. When Machain asked how he could make that much money
legally, Deleon responded that "it isn't illegal unless you get
caught," Machain said. He said Deleon told him he was routinely
solicited to carry out murders, which he did "on the side."

Deleon told him the Hawkses "were bad" and it would "make the world a
better place if they were taken out," Machain said. After the couple
were killed, he allegedly told Machain, they would get to keep their
boat and anything else they owned.

Machain said Deleon accompanied him to the Lakewood Mall, where they
bought two stun guns, and Machain went alone to another store to buy
two pairs of handcuffs. On a test-sail with the Hawkses on Nov. 6,
2004, Machain was to have overpowered Jackie Hawks while Deleon subdued
her husband. But Machain said Deleon abandoned the plan once they were
all on the boat, for unknown reasons. It was during that outing that
Machain said Deleon first learned that Thomas Hawks was a retired
probation officer "very physically fit for his age."

Back at the docks, Machain said, Deleon called his wife and told her
she had to come down to the boat to meet the Hawkses and make them
"feel more at ease." Within the next week he also decided that a third
person would be needed to help overcome Thomas Hawks.

On the morning of Nov. 15, Machain said, he and Deleon met up with that
person - whose name, he later learned, was John Fitzgerald Kennedy
- before returning to the pier. Once they were headed out to sea, he
said, Jackie Hawks called someone to report that she and her husband
were with the buyers.

Machain said he was standing in the kitchen of the main cabin when
Deleon and Kennedy overpowered Thomas Hawks in a lower area of the boat
near a bedroom. The commotion caused Jackie Hawks to try to move past
Machain, he said, and she screamed, "What's going on?"

With Jackie Hawks cornered in the kitchen, Machain said, he pulled out
his stun gun. "I knew I had to act. I had to overpower Mrs. Hawks. I
struggled with her. She was fighting me."

Eventually he got her handcuffed, he said, and took her down to the
bedroom, where her husband was already handcuffed on the bed. That's
when she asked Deleon, "How could you do this to us? You brought your
wife and kids here. We trusted you."

Machain helped Deleon cover the couple's eyes and mouths with duct tape
as Jackie Hawks cried, saying she didn't want to die and that she
wanted to see her new grandchild. The Hawkses were then taken up to the
main cabin one at a time to sign and fingerprint title transfer
documents. Jackie Hawks was told that if she cooperated she would be
released. "She was shaking uncontrollably," Machain recalled. When it
was her husband's turn, Deleon told him that if he tried anything funny
he would be struck with a Magnum flashlight. Thomas Hawks responded
that he wouldn't try anything, according to Machain.

The couple were brought back to the bedroom while Deleon and Kennedy
prepared the anchor on the aft deck, Machain said. Left to "baby-sit"
them, he watched as Thomas Hawks tried to console his wife.

She was still crying and asking, in a muffled voice through the tape,
why their captors were doing this to them.

"I could see Mr. Hawks trying to reach over and hold her hand and
comfort her," Machain said.

On the deck, the couple were tied together standing, her back to her
husband's chest with their hands still cuffed behind them.

Realizing what was happening, Thomas Hawks kicked Deleon as he tried to
fasten the couple to the anchor, sending him back into a deck chair,
Machain said.

Kennedy responded with a "hard swing" to the husband's right temple.
"It was a pretty hard blow" that left him staggering and making
"slurring noises," Machain said.

He would have fallen to his knees but "Mrs. Hawks was holding him up,"
all the time "screaming, yelling, asking, 'What's going on?' " he
recalled.

Deleon lifted the anchor and threw it overboard as Kennedy pushed the
couple overboard, Machain said.

Deleon then turned the yacht around and the men collected cash, jewelry
and other valuables, Machain said. Kennedy cracked open a beer, grabbed
a fishing rod and fished all the way back to the harbor, he said.



Thanks for the update on this one. Another one of those cases where the
death penalty should be *streamlined*. Once they are found guilty and
sentenced to die, give 'em one appeal and then stick the needle in 'em.
Just *my* opinion, of course.


Yeah, that'll bring the Hawks back to life, right? And make the
streets safer than if Skylar Deleon spends the rest of his life in
prison.

And there is no chance whatsoever that a 25 year old could grow and
change over the next two or three decades, doing good by working with
fellow inmates or convincing young people to not make the mistakes he
did. Like *some* other inmates who committed heinous crimes in their
youth have managed to do.

Nope, you say we might as well throw that life away as garbage. Must
be great to be able to see in to the future and know with such
certainty whether a person will ever be able to change and ever be able
to do any good for his fellow man. I don't know where one finds such
certainty about human nature and the future, but somehow I think it
comes from a place to which I wouldn't want to go.


Bo Raxo




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:40 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com