Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote in message . .. NOYB wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... On 11/7/2006 11:39 PM, NOYB wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message . .. On 11/7/2006 10:54 PM, NOYB wrote: If the Senate ends up tied (49/49 with 2 independents) it makes Joe the most powerful man in the government. Ironic. "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message news ![]() I'm guessing Repubs with a two seat margin, excluding a recount in Virginia. But the Dems took the House, and by a decent margin. We're finally going to have some oversight over the Bush mis-administration. Pffft. 1) Veto pen. 2) Senate confirms Bush's third SCOTUS appointment Your boy is a lame duck, and any number of Republican U.S. Senators coming up for re-election in 2008 will be rushing towards the middle. Quack. Most of the Democrats who won the House races all ran to the right. Pro-God, pro-life, pro-gun. A split Congress means less spending. I see the deficit falling even faster than Bush predicted. This hopefully will show both parties that if they want to win, they better move towards the center. The Republican party has slowly been drifting towards the center over the past 6 years as evidenced by the changes in leadership (Lott to Frist, and Delay to Hastert). The Democratic Party leadership is about as far left as you can get, yet they were carried to victory by the conservative members of their party. If they transition those lefty extremists out, and put the conservative Democrats in, they'll win the White House in '08. If not, they'll lose the House again, *and* lose the Presidency. |