Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,117
Default Twice the speed, Ten times the fuel

Just reviewing my notes from yesterday's sea trial of a 37-foot
semi-displacement trawler.

425 HP Cummins QSB engine.

That's not a bad engine choice for a single screw boat- it can be
operated at a low rpm without loading up (thanks to computerized fuel
control), and it can ber pushed pretty hard to get more speed than one
might otherwise expect from a boat in tht category.

Fuel consumption figures are taken from the engine-diagnostics screen
installed with the Cummins QSB.

Traditonal trawler fans will recognize the performance figures at 1400
RPM, 8.2 kt at 2.4gph.
On the other end of the performance spectrum, WOT is 3000 RPM where the
boat makes 16.5 kt at 22.4 gph.

Makes a dramatic statement about fuel economy: Doubling "displacement"
speed in this boat
uses almost exactly ten times as much fuel.

  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,275
Default Twice the speed, Ten times the fuel

"Chuck Gould" wrote in
ups.com:

Traditonal trawler fans will recognize the performance figures at 1400
RPM, 8.2 kt at 2.4gph.


http://www.perkins-sabre.com/PR/Engi.../Equipment.cfm
8 knots on half that fuel. The Perkins will be running after he's dead.

  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,117
Default Twice the speed, Ten times the fuel


Larry wrote:


http://www.perkins-sabre.com/PR/Engi.../Equipment.cfm
8 knots on half that fuel. The Perkins will be running after he's dead.


I own a late model Perkins engine. 6354 NA, 130 HP. Like it a lot.

I would doubt that the 4 banger you link to (86 HP at 2400 RPM) would
be an ideal choice for a 24,500 pound boat that one wanted to cruise at
8 kts. Nor am I inclined to believe that wound up to 2400 RPM (where
you *might* have a chance to get 8 kts out of it. maybe.) fuel burn
would be down to 1.2 GPH, which is what it would need to be to come in
at half the fuel burn of the QSB I referred to. And lastly, pushing
that 4 cylinder with its shorter crankshaft and less torque hard enough
to do the job would shorten its life expectancy considerably.

My last Perkins racked up almost 4000 hours before it croaked- and even
then it was a manifold failure and not really anything that Perkins did
when building the engine.

It's easy to agree that Perkins builds a very good engine. Older
technology on most of the models- which was one of the reasons I stuck
with Perkins when I had to repower.

There are some Krogens and Norhavns out there with very small single
engine mains, probably for maximum possible range offshore, but slowed
to 6 knots almost any engine is going to get pretty impressive fuel
economy.

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
So where is...................... *JimH* General 186 November 28th 05 02:29 PM
Add used oil to diesel fuel? Bill McKee General 21 November 13th 05 02:45 AM
Add used oil to diesel fuel? Bill McKee Cruising 21 November 13th 05 02:45 AM
using bunker fuel [email protected] Boat Building 13 October 7th 05 05:26 PM
Let there be heat! Gould 0738 General 4 November 29th 04 01:41 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:09 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017