Tom Francis wrote:
On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 07:07:28 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

On 10/9/2006 12:31 AM, Larry wrote:
"Bill Kearney" wrote in
t:

Believe whatever nonsense you like, but I'll trust them a lot more
than some internet crackpots.


But, noone answers the simple question:
"Where is the PLANE?"

There is no plane in ANY pictures from the first one of the 16' diameter
hole before the roof collapsed....through all the other pictures,
including the one with the rescue worker and his dog which found
NOTHING??

Over on alt.binaries.multimedia.documentaries is a movie about the Airbus
A300 that crashed just after takeoff due to wake turbulence and defective
tail fin design into Long Island near after 9/11.

If you download it and watch it please notice the HUGE PILE OF CRASHED
AIRPLANE THAT DIDN'T VAPORIZE OR BURN on impact. The firemen are
standing on TOP OF THE PILE hosing it down to cool it......A PILE OF
AIRPLANE RUBBLE WITH EASILY DISCERNABLE PIECES....a whole PILE of pieces!

The A300 is SMALLER than the plane that hit the Pentagon.....the one that
left NOT A TRACE on the lawn or in the 16' hole it all fit through into
the 5th dimension......

There was NO PLANE....or we could SEE IT!
Tell us, Larry, about your academic and photographic credentials that
allow you to make such pronouncements.

Oh, I know. You were in the Navy. As an electrician.

I am constantly amused by these dumbasses who seem to think that a
largely hollow tube made of aluminum with two wings also largely
hollow and made of aluminum can somehow survive a 600 mph impact with
a steel reinforced concrete building.

Of course, it's not on the camera so that proves there wasn't an
aircraft. Hmmm - I wonder if a camera that takes one and a half
frames per second can capture a aircraft moving 600 mph in three
frames. Think so?

Allow me to restate.

It's not amusing - it's sad.

I did see the security photos of the plane hitting the pentagon. There
are people who look for a conspiracy theory in everything, and ignore
the facts that disprove their theory.

"Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote in news:
:

I did see the security photos of the plane hitting the pentagon. There
are people who look for a conspiracy theory in everything, and ignore
the facts that disprove their theory.



The military released 5 frames....NOT ONE OF THEM SHOWS A PLANE, only a
"white trail of smoke", the kind that always trails a MISSILE.

Then there was the EXPLOSION and its FIREBALL....not jet fuel burning in
air, which if you look at the WTC movies is a BLACK SMOKE because jet fuel
burns SLOWLY and runs out of oxygen....

One of the news photos shows the edge of a floor in the outer ring where
the roof collapsed past it. Sitting on a wooden chair is a pile of
unburned papers with an unmelted computer monitor sitting on top of it in
the unoccupied office. Not a single singe from the 9000 gallons of jet
fuel that burned right next to it....



--
There's amazing intelligence in the Universe.
You can tell because none of them ever called Earth.

Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:


I did see the security photos of the plane hitting the pentagon. There
are people who look for a conspiracy theory in everything, and ignore
the facts that disprove their theory.

I wouldn't even mention this again, but since this is rec.boats I guess
my inside information that the hole in the Pentagon was caused by a
nuclear powered PWC is somewhat on topic.

There has been a huge conspiracy to cover up the fact that a PWC, not a
fictitious airplane with a fictitious flight number of "77" blew
through the outer ring of the building.

Some rotten bass-tards don't want us to know about the true power of
PWC's!
Among that group of shameless propagandists would be the creator of
this site:

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/..._evidence.html

"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
ups.com...

Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:


I did see the security photos of the plane hitting the pentagon. There
are people who look for a conspiracy theory in everything, and ignore
the facts that disprove their theory.

I wouldn't even mention this again, but since this is rec.boats I guess
my inside information that the hole in the Pentagon was caused by a
nuclear powered PWC is somewhat on topic.

There has been a huge conspiracy to cover up the fact that a PWC, not a
fictitious airplane with a fictitious flight number of "77" blew
through the outer ring of the building.

Some rotten bass-tards don't want us to know about the true power of
PWC's!
Among that group of shameless propagandists would be the creator of
this site:

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/..._evidence.html


Was not a PWC. Was a nuclear powered Bayliner. Why there was not much
damage. Fell apart too easily. The terrorists should have upgraded to at
least a Boston Whaler.

"Calif Bill" wrote in
link.net:

Was not a PWC. Was a nuclear powered Bayliner. Why there was not
much damage. Fell apart too easily. The terrorists should have
upgraded to at least a Boston Whaler.




This is what has amazed me. Noone seems to care about the truth....

Are we afraid of the truth? So, we make jokes, cover our eyes, hear what
they want us to.....just like Pearl Harbor.

--
There's amazing intelligence in the Universe.
You can tell because none of them ever called Earth.

Larry wrote:

This is what has amazed me. Noone seems to care about the truth....


Of course they do. The problem is that nobody can agree on what is
true. Nearly everybody
is misled by highly paid spin doctors, manipulated government reports
and news broadcasts, and partisan "talking points." We have now reached
the point where we head back into the dark ages- the moment when even
the propagandists begin to believe their own effluent and nobody any
longer has even the most remote idea what the truth is or how they
would recognize it if they encountered it.

But everybody still cares about truth - at least his or her personal
version of it.

Larry wrote:

"Calif Bill" wrote in
link.net:


Was not a PWC. Was a nuclear powered Bayliner. Why there was not
much damage. Fell apart too easily. The terrorists should have
upgraded to at least a Boston Whaler.





This is what has amazed me. Noone seems to care about the truth....

Are we afraid of the truth? So, we make jokes, cover our eyes, hear what
they want us to.....just like Pearl Harbor.


Noone is a strange name. Is it a man or a woman?