Tom Francis wrote:
On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 07:07:28 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

On 10/9/2006 12:31 AM, Larry wrote:
"Bill Kearney" wrote in
t:

Believe whatever nonsense you like, but I'll trust them a lot more
than some internet crackpots.


But, noone answers the simple question:
"Where is the PLANE?"

There is no plane in ANY pictures from the first one of the 16' diameter
hole before the roof collapsed....through all the other pictures,
including the one with the rescue worker and his dog which found
NOTHING??

Over on alt.binaries.multimedia.documentaries is a movie about the Airbus
A300 that crashed just after takeoff due to wake turbulence and defective
tail fin design into Long Island near after 9/11.

If you download it and watch it please notice the HUGE PILE OF CRASHED
AIRPLANE THAT DIDN'T VAPORIZE OR BURN on impact. The firemen are
standing on TOP OF THE PILE hosing it down to cool it......A PILE OF
AIRPLANE RUBBLE WITH EASILY DISCERNABLE PIECES....a whole PILE of pieces!

The A300 is SMALLER than the plane that hit the Pentagon.....the one that
left NOT A TRACE on the lawn or in the 16' hole it all fit through into
the 5th dimension......

There was NO PLANE....or we could SEE IT!
Tell us, Larry, about your academic and photographic credentials that
allow you to make such pronouncements.

Oh, I know. You were in the Navy. As an electrician.

I am constantly amused by these dumbasses who seem to think that a
largely hollow tube made of aluminum with two wings also largely
hollow and made of aluminum can somehow survive a 600 mph impact with
a steel reinforced concrete building.

Of course, it's not on the camera so that proves there wasn't an
aircraft. Hmmm - I wonder if a camera that takes one and a half
frames per second can capture a aircraft moving 600 mph in three
frames. Think so?

Allow me to restate.

It's not amusing - it's sad.

I did see the security photos of the plane hitting the pentagon. There
are people who look for a conspiracy theory in everything, and ignore
the facts that disprove their theory.