BoatBanter.com - Overheating Perkins revisited.....

On 29 Aug 2003 05:13:04 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:

(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ...
On 28 Aug 2003 04:52:04 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:

(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message
Again, you are just speculating. You think that because the all mighty
twit Steve says so, that it is evidence. What a ****ing moron you are.
So, let's see, everything that I say, whether there is ANY shred of
truth, or real evidence, I can, because I say so, CALL it evidence? I
can't? Hmm, you are!
So, I have evidence that Steve is a blow hard, who thinks he is always
right, and also thinks he is therefore an expert in everything. THAT
"evidence" proves, without a doubt that he is suffering from some
dilussional mental deficency. THAT in turn, is evidence that he should
be commited to a mental institution to get off of the drugs he is
taking.
See how that works, Steve? THAT is exactly what happens when people
like you are stupid enough to not know the difference between
speculation, and evidence.

Chasing your tail will only get you dizzy. Doing so in public will get
you laughed at.

so again, using YOUR ignorant reasoning, if someone says something in
a newsgroup, then anybody else that reads it, can, at there whim, say
something like "by the way you posted that, it appears that you are a
heroin addict", then that in fact, becomes EVIDENCE?? What a stupid

No. That's your ignorant interpretation of my reasoning, proof that
you've lost your ability to reason.

You idiot, it's EXACTLY the reasoning you used to come to the
conclusion, with your so called "evidence" that I was "drunk" when I
posted. Not a lot like it, EXACTLY like it.

Actually, it was nothing like it. You forgot the main difference is
that there has to be evidence. It can't be at there [sic] whim. It
can't be just anything someone says in a newsgroup. But if there's
evidence in what they say that they are a heroin addict, then of couse
they can say it. But we all know you're to stupid to see the
difference. Hell, you've admitted you're to stupid to see the differece
just above.

****ing putz you are!! So, because I have caught you trying to
impersonate someone who is trained in Karate, I have evidence that you
are schizophrenic. Now, are you seeking help for your schizophrenic
tendencies? See how, using YOUR idiotic methodology, you are forever
deemed as a schizophrenic, due to your tendencies to think you are
trained in things you know nothing about. Now remember, using your
stupid reasoning, I have actual evidence of this.

Watching your mental breakdown as it happens in a public forum has been
interesting. There's a case study in you just waiting to be done. If
it were anyone else, I'd feel pity. But in your case, I'll just keep
prodding.

You are an idiot schizophrenic. The concrete evidence is in this
thread.

You've only proven you don't know the meaning of the evidence, proven
you don't know the warning signals of schizophrenia, proven you don't
know how to use google to find anywhere I've said I'm trained in karate
.... because if you could find it you would have posted it by now. The
simple fact that I've never told you what my training is in karate blows
your whole stupid schizophrenic argument out of the water and proves yet
again that you are a liar ... as if we need more proof of that fact,
Walt.

You've proven you don't know how to lay out a logical argument. You've
proven you don't know the meaning of the word neglect. In short, you've
proven you are a lying stupid moron. Care to continue with this and
provide even more solid proof of that fact?

Steve