Harry Krause wrote in
:

On 9/28/2006 12:27 AM, Larry wrote:
"Stanley Barthfarkle" wrote in
news:wfCSg.6065$e66.5729 @newssvr13.news.prodigy.com:

Racism is our biggest weakness.



Why is racism and apartheid NOT ok in America and South Africa but IS
ok in Israel??

Why is someone who points this out in America or Europe or South
Africa a hero, and someone who points this out in Israel an
antisemite?

Why is MY government paying for it with MY money?



Is it any wonder why Muslim people hate us and want to see us burn?

Stupid asses....WAKE UP AMERICA!


Larry is schizophrenic *and* a hater of Jews.
Am I surprised?

Nope.


Same attacks, every time someone points to that damned wall.....



--
There's amazing intelligence in the Universe.
You can tell because none of them ever called Earth.

Alotta Fagina wrote in
:

"Israel" does not equal "Jews". Unless you want to classify Israel as
a theocracy, and then explain the hypocrisy in that double-standard,
which is what Larry did rather deftly.

I note that you didn't answer a single one of his legitimate
questions. Par for the course for you.



They won't answer, either. A French woman did a fantastic documentary on
the Wall from both sides of it and the Israeli military. It was uploaded
some time ago to alt.binaries.multimedia.documentaries. Keep an eye out
for it.
Thierry Lenouvel
"Wall"

"Divide and conquer". You hold a gun to their heads while you build an
electric fence or concrete wall right through the center of their towns,
cities and farms. You put the farm house on one side of the wall and the
olive trees they can no longer get to on the other. In effect, you
starve them out. You surround the town with your wall, a siege wall like
in Middle Aged Europe and starve them into submission, keeping them from
their jobs, their income, their food....all in the name of "security".

Imagine, for instance, building a wall around Harlem in New York City
because the whites living around it want to starve out the blacks in
Harlem to steal their land to build more white neighborhoods of the rich
and famous. What would be the world's reaction? What would be America's
reaction?!

This wall isn't about building YOURSELF in behind a wall, like the rich
do in America in their walled enclaves to protect themselves from the
rest of us. There are many within 20 miles of my trashy neighborhood.
No, this is the OTHER way. One group, the Israelis, build a wall around
the poor to starve them out and run them off. Isn't this EXACTLY what
the Nazis did to the Jews in Germany in the 1930's? Build a wall and
make a Jewish ghetto to starve them out of Germany, taking their
land/homes/businesses?

Why is this different when turned around the other way?

Go find "Wall" and listen to the Palestinian farmers. Look closely at
their starving children in tattered rags standing by the wall. Listen to
General Yaron's interview, looking down every time he lies to the
interviewer, about what they are doing and why. This is supposed to be
about stopping Palestinian terrorists. Look at the map of the wall.
This wall should be built AROUND Isreal's kibbutzes, not around the
Palestinian people.

$10M/km is what it's costing. I bet we can stop it by simply cutting off
US foreign aid to Israel until it's torn down. US Taxpayers are directly
responsible for its construction.

Is it any wonder most of the people in the region, the ones who control
the OIL and prices hate America so?



--
There's amazing intelligence in the Universe.
You can tell because none of them ever called Earth.

Larry wrote:

Larry,
You have been around long enough that to know political discussion in
rec.boats don't solve anything, and always end up in flame fest.

If you want rec.boats to really discuss boating issues we all need to
just ignore these obvious trolls.

wrote:
Fred, as far as I'm concerned you're a racist ****.

Why do you feel like you need to cross post this in
alt.fashion,rec.food.cooking,triangle.general,rec. boats,or.general

then next time you wish to throw out your bigoted puke, you will post
in different groups then those listed?

But it seems you really think this is necessary in rec.boats.

So that he can bait people like you. Nice credibility check with the
childish name calling, by the way.

If I am remembering my history correctly, Teddy Roosevelt was President
from 1901 until early 1909, and in that period of time the US did not
fight in any major wars. If you are referring to the Spanish-American War
of 1898, in which Roosevelt participated, the President who led us into
that conflict was William McKinley.



On Thu, 28 Sep 2006, Alotta Fagina wrote:

You wrote:

Teddy Roosevelt sold a useless war to a dim bulb sap of a president.

After said dim bulb sap campaigned for re-election on the promise to honor
Jeffersonian non-intervention.



Marshall Adesman
"Baseball Spoken Here"
Duke University
email:

McKinley was the George W. Bush of his era. He was totally indecisive and
was shoved into that war by Roosevelt, the Cheney of that era, along with
others who, lacking Viagra, needed some way to feel like real men. The war
began over the mistaken belief that the battleship "Maine" had been
sabotaged. Naturally, it made perfect sense to invade the wrong country
(Phillippines) just for grins. Does this sound like a familiar story?

This book goes into extraordinary detail about the war:
"In Our Image", by Stanley Karnow
http://search.barnesandnoble.com/boo...45328168&itm=1


wrote in message
pub.duke.edu...
If I am remembering my history correctly, Teddy Roosevelt was President
from 1901 until early 1909, and in that period of time the US did not
fight in any major wars. If you are referring to the Spanish-American War
of 1898, in which Roosevelt participated, the President who led us into
that conflict was William McKinley.



On Thu, 28 Sep 2006, Alotta Fagina wrote:

You wrote:

Teddy Roosevelt sold a useless war to a dim bulb sap of a president.

After said dim bulb sap campaigned for re-election on the promise to
honor
Jeffersonian non-intervention.



Marshall Adesman
"Baseball Spoken Here"
Duke University
email:

Harry Krause wrote in
:

Just be honest, Larry. Over the years, you've posted dozens of remarks
that indicate your disdain for Jews, and hundreds of remarks that
indicate you're a paranoid schizophrenic. But that's what makes you
fun,
right?

Paranoid? No. "disdain" for Jews...guilty as charged. Too much power
in the hands of any religious nuts always makes me nervous. Look back
through history to see why...genocide. Jews hate us Goyum as much as we
hate them, I suppose. ANY religious group who maintains their children
in a sealed up society and tells them they are the superrace is to be
watched carefully by the rest of us.....

A very disproportinately small minority religious group with automatic
dual citizenship with the State of Israel controls the top of most
corporations, all banking and most government bureaucracies. For those
who have forgotten who are friends a

http://www.ussliberty.com/

Many of my electronics school classmates died when our "friends" tried to
sink our ship in international waters in 1967.

You're goddamned right, Harry. I'm no friend of the State of Israel....


BTW, do you still have and use that cute jetboat you once owned?




Nope. Unloaded SeaRay's mistakes on one of the kids who used to ride
around in it. He wanted it and I wanted rid of the costs. There's no
lack of boats to play with at the docks...(c;

Now, be a good boy and go explain away why genocide, apartheid and the
wall are ok in Israel but not in Maryland or Mississippi.....

basskisser wrote:
So that he can bait people like you. Nice credibility check with the
childish name calling, by the way.


From: basskisser - view profile
Date: Wed, Sep 6 2006 2:09 pm
Email: "basskisser"
Groups: rec.boats

what a petty, shallow, lying, childish low life piece of **** you are.
I hope your sickly wife isn't a low life piece of trash like you are.
Anger, what makes you think I'm angry, Jim? Are you that stupid that
you think you can judge a person's emotions on usenet? Quite the
contrary, I feel sorry for you and your mental condition(s). You've
single handedly ruined this newsgroup, once again. It was on the right
track until you started your idiotic childish bull**** again.


Yeah, credibility at it's finest.

Maybe if the Palestinians did not send suicide bombers to blow up civilians,
there would not be any need for a wall. This wall has reduced the number of
suicide bomb attacks considerably. If it is an inconvenience for the
Palestinians, let them
do something to stop the attacks, instead of throwing flowers and candy at the
perpetrators of these cowardly attacks.

If the Jews are all powerful and control everything, why haven't they been able
to
stifle the B.S. remarks from people like you, or completely stop the attacks by
their
Arab neighbors?

Your comparison of the wall in Israel to the Ghetto walls is incorrect. The
former
does not cut of total access to these areas, whereas the Ghetto walls completely

surrounded particular areas. Big difference.

I might agree to a cutoff of aid from the USA to Israel, but only if the rich
Arab states and Iran stop shipping arms and money to support the terrorists.

Sherwin D.

Larry wrote:

Alotta Fagina wrote in
:

"Israel" does not equal "Jews". Unless you want to classify Israel as
a theocracy, and then explain the hypocrisy in that double-standard,
which is what Larry did rather deftly.

I note that you didn't answer a single one of his legitimate
questions. Par for the course for you.



They won't answer, either. A French woman did a fantastic documentary on
the Wall from both sides of it and the Israeli military. It was uploaded
some time ago to alt.binaries.multimedia.documentaries. Keep an eye out
for it.
Thierry Lenouvel
"Wall"

"Divide and conquer". You hold a gun to their heads while you build an
electric fence or concrete wall right through the center of their towns,
cities and farms. You put the farm house on one side of the wall and the
olive trees they can no longer get to on the other. In effect, you
starve them out. You surround the town with your wall, a siege wall like
in Middle Aged Europe and starve them into submission, keeping them from
their jobs, their income, their food....all in the name of "security".

Imagine, for instance, building a wall around Harlem in New York City
because the whites living around it want to starve out the blacks in
Harlem to steal their land to build more white neighborhoods of the rich
and famous. What would be the world's reaction? What would be America's
reaction?!

This wall isn't about building YOURSELF in behind a wall, like the rich
do in America in their walled enclaves to protect themselves from the
rest of us. There are many within 20 miles of my trashy neighborhood.
No, this is the OTHER way. One group, the Israelis, build a wall around
the poor to starve them out and run them off. Isn't this EXACTLY what
the Nazis did to the Jews in Germany in the 1930's? Build a wall and
make a Jewish ghetto to starve them out of Germany, taking their
land/homes/businesses?

Why is this different when turned around the other way?

Go find "Wall" and listen to the Palestinian farmers. Look closely at
their starving children in tattered rags standing by the wall. Listen to
General Yaron's interview, looking down every time he lies to the
interviewer, about what they are doing and why. This is supposed to be
about stopping Palestinian terrorists. Look at the map of the wall.
This wall should be built AROUND Isreal's kibbutzes, not around the
Palestinian people.

$10M/km is what it's costing. I bet we can stop it by simply cutting off
US foreign aid to Israel until it's torn down. US Taxpayers are directly
responsible for its construction.

Is it any wonder most of the people in the region, the ones who control
the OIL and prices hate America so?

--
There's amazing intelligence in the Universe.
You can tell because none of them ever called Earth.

Maybe if the Palestinians did not send suicide bombers to blow up
civilians, there would not be any need for a wall.


Alotta Fagina wrote:
Maybe if the Palestinians had lived ONE DAY WITHOUT BEING UNDER MILITARY
OCCUPATION AND ECONOMIC BLOCKADE they wouldn't see a need for suicide
bombers.

Maybe if the Palestinians, after they attacked their Jewish
neighbors with the intention of exterminating them, and
lost, had either been willing to accept the change of gov't
or move out (of course, to move out they would have to be
accepted into neighboring Arab countries), they would not
have any urge to turn their kids into suicide bombers.

Chillingly prophetic words:
"There will be no peace in the Middle East until the Arabs
love their children more than they hate Jews." -Golda Meir

DSK