Charlie Morgan wrote:
On 20 Sep 2006 09:12:12 -0700, "Chuck Gould"
wrote:


Charlie Morgan wrote:
On 20 Sep 2006 08:20:40 -0700, "Chuck Gould"
wrote:


Charlie Morgan wrote:


Cetol gloss is an entirely different product than Cetol Marine. Cetol
Marine breathes and is very durable. I would not characterize Cetol
Marine as a "stain", either.


You may want to take that up with Sikkens. They describe Cetol Marine
as containing
"pigments". How would you characterize a non-opaque application of
pigment via an oil or water base if not as a "stain"?


Okay, now we've established that you don't even know the difference
between paint and stain.

CWM

Sorry, a renewed personal attack doesn't get you off the hook here.
Does your answer indicate that you feel Cetol is a "paint"?

If not, please reply directly and without digressing to personal
remarks to:

"How would you characterize a non-opaque applicatin of pigment via an
oil or water base if not as a 'stain'"?

(An additional personal remark or failure to respond at all will be
accepted as an indicator that you feel Cetol is a paint).

Accept whatever you want, buttplug. You'll just be wrong about a
longer list of things.

CWM

OK. So we now at least know where you stand. You believe that Cetol is
a paint.
Wouldn't it be just as easy to express your opinion without resorting
to name calling and personal remarks?

Did you know that one reliable way to evalaute a debate is to note
which party is resorting to personal remarks and insult? The common
name for that party is "the loser". Do come back when you can speak to
the actual merits of an issue, won't you?