Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#26
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
As to instruments, are you truly of the belief that a barometer from 1885 is the equal of, say, a barometer of 1985 vintage? Sure, why wouldn't it? It's a very simple instrument, just two columns of non-volatile fluid to compare ambient air pressure to a vacuum. Modern instruments are more sophisticated, sure. You can accurately measure all kinds of other things that an 1885 meteorologist would barely be able to guess. Anemometers back then were a bit kludgy, for example. I believe, and I may not be correct here, that accurate records, albeit limited in scope, didn't start on a regular basis until 1890 in the US. Sounds right to me. .... You can't expect a report using the scale of 1838 to be as accurate as the scale of 1938 - it could be off be a surprising factor. Or it could be pretty close. When you go back a bit further, you have much wider variation in instruments and much fewer recorded data anyway. If you go past the 1790s there is pretty much nothing... so it ramps up and more recent is better. On that, I'm not disagreeing. I'm just trying to point out that they weren't cavemen back then. Allow me to rephrase. To wit: So to just patently say that storm severity and frequency is increasing and THAT global warming IS THE SOLE cause is not only short sighted but lousy science Better now? Yes, much, thanks... in fact I'd go a step further and say that it isn't science at all. The only problem I have with your statement above is that it's a straw man. Nobody (AFAIK) is saying that hurricanes ARE absolutely increasing in frequency & severity; and this is caused SOLELY by global warming. It has been suggested that the two are linked. I'm a lousy multi-tasker. :) Me too. For another thing, I'd be very surprised if any scientists really said that. 250 years after Newton they are still calling gravity just a theory. Isn't it? Seriously - isn't it still just a theory? :) Actually, gravity has been disproven. Ain't no such thing! What with all the quantum nonsense they've been doing lately, it wouldn't surprise me in the least that the only thing keeping us on the face of the planet was really teeny tiny itsy bitsy blue and green caterpillars. No, what holds us all to the ground is the invisible, undetectable, and un-knowable residue of the slime-god of boogers who sneezed on the shell of the primordial turtle Bfikkly-Tog on whose back we ride across the inky sky. Science doesn't know or care why. Science only measures and predicts. I don't disagree that there is impact from greenhouse gases - I don't think I've ever actually disagreed that global warming has some effect on the environment. My mistake, I thought you had said in the past that global warming wasn't happening. However, I actually refuse to believe that global warming is the sole cause of environmental change in terms of supposedly increased severity and frequency of storms. I don't believe that either. I don't believe that one can just categorically state that global warming is the sole cause - there are lots of different factors that enter into the equation and we're not anywhere near being able to model it accurately. Wait a minute, I thought we were arguing about something else... dammit where' my prgram... can't tell the players without a program... DSK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
So where is...................... | General | |||
SADDAM MUST SHARE THE BLAME FOR KATRINA | General | |||
OT Quit Criticizing BushCo | General | |||
OT BushCo FINALLY admits global warming | General | |||
OT The Incredible Lying BushCO! | General |