If Republicans lose the House, it will mean amnesty for 30,000,000 Illegals.
 

"MURS radios" wrote in message
ups.com...
The Traitorous Senate and President Bush are primed to pass an amnesty
bill... the ONLY thing that has been saving US has been The House of
Representatives. If the Republicans lose control of the House, it
seems that there will be nothing stopping a Democrat-controlled house
from quickly granting amnesty to 30,000,000 Illegal Aliens...
hopefully, any such bill could be repealed, BEFORE the first illegals
are granted citizenship (I think there will be a 5 year waiting period,
or something like that, before they are given automatic citizenship).

These small congressional elections amount to THE MOST IMPORTANT VOTES
in the history of our great nation. We can NOT simply hand control of
our nation over to a group of people with no respect for our nation, or
laws.

I could give a RAT'S ASS if the Republicans lose the Senate or the
Presidency, as these seats of government are already controlled by
TRAITORS... but, we can NOT afford for the republicans to lose the
HOUSE!

- Stewart
San Diego Minuteman

Agreed.

Fred

If Republicans lose the House, it will mean amnesty for 30,000,000 Illegals.
 

They were going to be prosecuted or arrested or something? That's like
saying I'm going to get amnesty for all the times I've gone over the
speed limit on the interstate. I should care? Nothing changes for the
30 million that are already here one way or another. No bill gets
passed, they are still here and go on going sending their kids to
school and using social and medical services anyway. There is no
solution that involves sending the 30 million back where they came
from. It just ain't going to happen. There might be a solution that
controls what happens from now on.


fred wrote:
"MURS radios" wrote in message
ups.com...
The Traitorous Senate and President Bush are primed to pass an amnesty
bill... the ONLY thing that has been saving US has been The House of
Representatives. If the Republicans lose control of the House, it
seems that there will be nothing stopping a Democrat-controlled house
from quickly granting amnesty to 30,000,000 Illegal Aliens...
hopefully, any such bill could be repealed, BEFORE the first illegals
are granted citizenship (I think there will be a 5 year waiting period,
or something like that, before they are given automatic citizenship).

These small congressional elections amount to THE MOST IMPORTANT VOTES
in the history of our great nation. We can NOT simply hand control of
our nation over to a group of people with no respect for our nation, or
laws.

I could give a RAT'S ASS if the Republicans lose the Senate or the
Presidency, as these seats of government are already controlled by
TRAITORS... but, we can NOT afford for the republicans to lose the
HOUSE!

- Stewart
San Diego Minuteman

Agreed.

Fred

.
 

please don't crosspost to rec.boats

.
 

please don't crosspost to rec.boats

If Republicans lose the House, it will mean amnesty for 30,000,000 Illegals.
 

jamesgangnc wrote:
They were going to be prosecuted or arrested or something? That's like
saying I'm going to get amnesty for all the times I've gone over the
speed limit on the interstate. I should care? Nothing changes for the
30 million that are already here one way or another. No bill gets
passed, they are still here and go on going sending their kids to
school and using social and medical services anyway. There is no
solution that involves sending the 30 million back where they came
from. It just ain't going to happen. There might be a solution that
controls what happens from now on.

Right now in CA the fruit crops are rotting on the trees because there
isn't enough pickers.

.
 

"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
oups.com...
please don't crosspost to rec.boats


Apparently that privelege is reserved for you, eh?

If Republicans lose the House, it will mean amnesty for 30,000,000 Illegals.
 

Alotta Fagina wrote:
You wrote:


jamesgangnc wrote:
They were going to be prosecuted or arrested or something? That's like
saying I'm going to get amnesty for all the times I've gone over the
speed limit on the interstate. I should care? Nothing changes for the
30 million that are already here one way or another. No bill gets
passed, they are still here and go on going sending their kids to
school and using social and medical services anyway. There is no
solution that involves sending the 30 million back where they came
from. It just ain't going to happen. There might be a solution that
controls what happens from now on.

Right now in CA the fruit crops are rotting on the trees because there
isn't enough pickers.

Yeah, there was no California produce industry until illegals came.

Idiot.

Yes, you ARE an idiot! Go to:
http://www.sfgate.com
It's the San Francisco Chronicle website. Now, click on Day in Pictures
for today, Friday 9/8/06. If you do this some other day, then just open
the Day in Pictures, and click on the archives. Scroll until you find a
huge pile of rotting fruit, the caption says:

Wasted fruit: Tons of pears, picked past their prime, rot in a field
near Lakeport, Calif. An estimated 30 percent of this year's pear crop
will not be harvested because of a lack of migrant laborers.

Get it? Idiot indeed!

If Republicans lose the House, it will mean amnesty for 30,000,000 Illegals.
 

In article . com, basskisser wrote:

Wasted fruit: Tons of pears, picked past their prime, rot in a field
near Lakeport, Calif. An estimated 30 percent of this year's pear crop
will not be harvested because of a lack of migrant laborers.

The jobs that even 30,000,000 illegal aliens won't do.

Guess the farmers are going to have to suck it up and make some capitial
equipment investment and get into the 1990s.

.
 

"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
oups.com...
please don't crosspost to rec.boats


Why don't you call your group what it is, rec.yachts?
Talk about elitists.

Thumper

If Republicans lose the House, it will mean amnesty for 30,000,000 Illegals.
 

Alotta Fagina wrote:
You wrote:


Alotta Fagina wrote:
You wrote:


jamesgangnc wrote:
They were going to be prosecuted or arrested or something? That's
like saying I'm going to get amnesty for all the times I've gone
over the speed limit on the interstate. I should care? Nothing
changes for the 30 million that are already here one way or
another. No bill gets passed, they are still here and go on going
sending their kids to school and using social and medical services
anyway. There is no solution that involves sending the 30 million
back where they came from. It just ain't going to happen. There
might be a solution that controls what happens from now on.

Right now in CA the fruit crops are rotting on the trees because
there isn't enough pickers.

Yeah, there was no California produce industry until illegals came.

Idiot.

Yes, you ARE an idiot! Go to:
http://www.sfgate.com
It's the San Francisco Chronicle website. Now, click on Day in Pictures
for today, Friday 9/8/06. If you do this some other day, then just open
the Day in Pictures, and click on the archives. Scroll until you find a
huge pile of rotting fruit, the caption says:

Wasted fruit: Tons of pears, picked past their prime, rot in a field
near Lakeport, Calif. An estimated 30 percent of this year's pear crop
will not be harvested because of a lack of migrant laborers.

Get it? Idiot indeed!

They can hire someone else. After all, the Bush economy has half the
country unemployed, right?

Damn, you are dumber than a post, huh? They can't find the labor to
pick the crops, period. Who will they hire? Idiot, indeed. You was
wrong, and still are.

.
 

Thumper (nospam) wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
oups.com...
please don't crosspost to rec.boats


Why don't you call your group what it is, rec.yachts?
Talk about elitists.

Thumper

Yeah, my 18' bass boat certainly qualifies as a yacht.

If Republicans lose the House, it will mean amnesty for 30,000,000 Illegals.
 

Damn, you are dumber than a post, huh? They can't find the labor to
pick the crops, period. Who will they hire? Idiot, indeed. You was
wrong, and still are.

And you apparently miss the larger issue of wages not be adjusted to fit
market demands. This whole argument about foreign workers is a smokescreen
clouding the real issue of wages being far too low. The days of racing to
the bottom to get illegals to do the work for next to nothing are rapidly
coming to a close. Wages will have to rise and that will certainly affect
market prices. But as they've been artifically low for over two decades
it's coming time to see them adjust. Blame yourselves for pretending you
could get everything for low prices, you can't and it's now becoming
painfully clear.

.
 

Candace wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
oups.com...
please don't crosspost to rec.boats


Apparently that privelege is reserved for you, eh?

??????

Some screwup from one of the other groups on the long list is dumping
political crap into the rec.boats NG.

When I assert the "privilege" of dumping political crap into the group
you normally frequent, you will have a case. For now, you don't.

.
 

basskisser wrote:
jamesgangnc wrote:
They were going to be prosecuted or arrested or something? That's like
saying I'm going to get amnesty for all the times I've gone over the
speed limit on the interstate. I should care? Nothing changes for the
30 million that are already here one way or another. No bill gets
passed, they are still here and go on going sending their kids to
school and using social and medical services anyway. There is no
solution that involves sending the 30 million back where they came
from. It just ain't going to happen. There might be a solution that
controls what happens from now on.

Right now in CA the fruit crops are rotting on the trees because there
isn't enough pickers.

..

If Republicans lose the House, it will mean amnesty for 30,000,000 Illegals.
 

But that same nikon camera is $3000 in japan. So figure that one.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
. ..
Bill Kearney wrote:
Damn, you are dumber than a post, huh? They can't find the labor to
pick the crops, period. Who will they hire? Idiot, indeed. You was
wrong, and still are.

And you apparently miss the larger issue of wages not be adjusted to fit
market demands. This whole argument about foreign workers is a
smokescreen
clouding the real issue of wages being far too low. The days of racing
to
the bottom to get illegals to do the work for next to nothing are rapidly
coming to a close. Wages will have to rise and that will certainly
affect
market prices. But as they've been artifically low for over two decades
it's coming time to see them adjust. Blame yourselves for pretending you
could get everything for low prices, you can't and it's now becoming
painfully clear.


I think you're wrong, Bill. The Republican-Corporate plan to return
American workers to serfdom is still in its initial stages. And we haven't
been getting "everything" at low prices. Most of the prices middle income
folks pay for what they need are artificially high.

As an example, a Nikon digital camera that sells in this country for $1600
can be purchased in Thailand for $600.

We're being squeezed for the last drops.

And I haven't even addressed what is happening to workers at the
workplace.

I'm sure I won't live long enough to see it, but it would warm my cold
bones if middle-class Americans revolt some time in the future and stick
the heads of Republican lawmakers and judges and corporate muckity-mucks
on pikes.

If Republicans lose the House, it will mean amnesty for 30,000,000 Illegals.
 

"Bill Kearney" wrote in message
t...

Damn, you are dumber than a post, huh? They can't find the labor to
pick the crops, period. Who will they hire? Idiot, indeed. You was
wrong, and still are.

And you apparently miss the larger issue of wages not be adjusted to fit
market demands. This whole argument about foreign workers is a
smokescreen
clouding the real issue of wages being far too low. The days of racing to
the bottom to get illegals to do the work for next to nothing are rapidly
coming to a close. Wages will have to rise and that will certainly affect
market prices. But as they've been artifically low for over two decades
it's coming time to see them adjust. Blame yourselves for pretending you
could get everything for low prices, you can't and it's now becoming
painfully clear.

Take this unrelated cross-posting somewhere else. As far as I can tell, it's
not related to any of the NGs it's cross-posted to.

.
 

"basskisser" wrote in message
ps.com...

Thumper (nospam) wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
oups.com...
please don't crosspost to rec.boats


Why don't you call your group what it is, rec.yachts?
Talk about elitists.

Thumper

Yeah, my 18' bass boat certainly qualifies as a yacht.


Absolutely. I used to own a land yaght. a 1993 Cadilac Sedan De Ville. but
never posted to your group. Now I own another 2 wheeled land yaght. I still
haven't posted to your group. That's because I don't wear a white sports
jacket with ascot and navy blue slacks and captains cap. Or a blue double
breasted jacket, ascot and white dress pleated wool dress pants with penny
loafers and, of course, the white captains cap.
That you yacht people do.

+
 

Wow, Fred,

you really like to cross-post, dont you??

rec.motorcycles,rec.autos.sport.nascar,misc.transp ort.trucking,rec.autos.driving,rec.boats

.
 

Thumper wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ps.com...

Thumper (nospam) wrote:

"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
egroups.com...

please don't crosspost to rec.boats


Why don't you call your group what it is, rec.yachts?
Talk about elitists.

Thumper

Yeah, my 18' bass boat certainly qualifies as a yacht.



Absolutely. I used to own a land yaght. a 1993 Cadilac Sedan De Ville. but
never posted to your group. Now I own another 2 wheeled land yaght. I still
haven't posted to your group. That's because I don't wear a white sports
jacket with ascot and navy blue slacks and captains cap. Or a blue double
breasted jacket, ascot and white dress pleated wool dress pants with penny
loafers and, of course, the white captains cap.
That you yacht people do.



Well, it does show the crew who's running the boat.
Uniforms are very important when displaying authority...ask any military
or law enforcement agency.

.
 

"Don White" wrote in message
...
Thumper wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ps.com...

Thumper (nospam) wrote:

"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
legroups.com...

please don't crosspost to rec.boats


Why don't you call your group what it is, rec.yachts?
Talk about elitists.

Thumper

Yeah, my 18' bass boat certainly qualifies as a yacht.



Absolutely. I used to own a land yaght. a 1993 Cadilac Sedan De Ville.
but never posted to your group. Now I own another 2 wheeled land yaght. I
still haven't posted to your group. That's because I don't wear a white
sports jacket with ascot and navy blue slacks and captains cap. Or a blue
double breasted jacket, ascot and white dress pleated wool dress pants
with penny loafers and, of course, the white captains cap.
That you yacht people do.

Well, it does show the crew who's running the boat.
Uniforms are very important when displaying authority...ask any military
or law enforcement agency.

Especially on an 18' bass boat.

(|;)

Thumper

If Republicans lose the House, it will mean amnesty for 30,000,000 Illegals.
 

Bill Kearney wrote:
Damn, you are dumber than a post, huh? They can't find the labor to
pick the crops, period. Who will they hire? Idiot, indeed. You was
wrong, and still are.

And you apparently miss the larger issue of wages not be adjusted to fit
market demands. This whole argument about foreign workers is a smokescreen
clouding the real issue of wages being far too low. The days of racing to
the bottom to get illegals to do the work for next to nothing are rapidly
coming to a close. Wages will have to rise and that will certainly affect
market prices. But as they've been artifically low for over two decades
it's coming time to see them adjust. Blame yourselves for pretending you
could get everything for low prices, you can't and it's now becoming
painfully clear.

Smokescreen? Do you honestly think that CA farmers WANT 30% of their
profit rotting on the trees????

If Republicans lose the House, it will mean amnesty for 30,000,000 Illegals.
 

Gene wrote:
On 8 Sep 2006 08:54:03 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:

Right now in CA the fruit crops are rotting on the trees because there
isn't enough pickers.

Suits me. Let ALL of it rot until the growers are willing to pay a
wage that Americans can afford to work for. It is called the law of
supply and demand... as long as we are playing lawfully. If you want
to turn your head and pretend that only *certain* laws apply... well,
you'll get what you ask for.

The big fact that gets left out of this equation is that illegals
receive about 5-7 times what an American would receive in wage
benefits (not counting taking the extra value of their Social Security
and Social Welfare out of the hands of American families) considering
what they make and expect to take or send back home with exchange
rates being what they are.

There is absolutely NO incentive for an increase in the minimum wage
as long as there is an unlimited supply of manpower willing to live
like refugees and accept the bare minimum wage.

If you want to consider yourself a Liberal Democrat and refuse to
support the American worker.... you are neither.
--


Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Southport, NC. http://myworkshop.idleplay.net/
-----------------
www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com - *Completion*Retention*Speed*
Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road
-----------------

If they pay a higher wage, either their profits are gone, or the price
of goods goes up to the consumer so much that they won't buy, and
again, there goes the profits.

If Republicans lose the House, it will mean amnesty for 30,000,000 Illegals.
 

On 10 Sep 2006 06:19:17 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


Bill Kearney wrote:
Damn, you are dumber than a post, huh? They can't find the labor to
pick the crops, period. Who will they hire? Idiot, indeed. You was
wrong, and still are.

And you apparently miss the larger issue of wages not be adjusted to fit
market demands. This whole argument about foreign workers is a smokescreen
clouding the real issue of wages being far too low. The days of racing to
the bottom to get illegals to do the work for next to nothing are rapidly
coming to a close. Wages will have to rise and that will certainly affect
market prices. But as they've been artifically low for over two decades
it's coming time to see them adjust. Blame yourselves for pretending you
could get everything for low prices, you can't and it's now becoming
painfully clear.

Smokescreen? Do you honestly think that CA farmers WANT 30% of their
profit rotting on the trees????

The bottom line is economic slavery for some more dark-skinned people. It
wasn't enough that we had slavery and fought a civil war over it. Now, we're
trying to do it again with a different group, and with their participation.

Its way past time for this industry to automate. This means crop harvesting
_machines_ doing the work. Is it more expensive than slave-labor wages? Of
course! Is it the right thing to do? Absolutely.

Paying people peanuts is wrong, and it doesn't matter who they are. Can't get
the natives to spend all day in the hot sun stooping over and picking your
tomatoes or carrots or whatever for what you want to pay them? Tough - buy a
machine to do it. You can likely get 1 machine operator, who will replace
dozens of manual workers, and get the harvest done. That's the way to handle
this.

The bottom line is no more slavery - not ball and chain slavery and not
economic slavery. Slavery is always a bad idea, no matter how you try to dress
it up.

Dave Head

If Republicans lose the House, it will mean amnesty for 30,000,000Illegals.
 

basskisser wrote:
Gene wrote:
On 8 Sep 2006 08:54:03 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:

Right now in CA the fruit crops are rotting on the trees because there
isn't enough pickers.
Suits me. Let ALL of it rot until the growers are willing to pay a
wage that Americans can afford to work for. It is called the law of
supply and demand... as long as we are playing lawfully. If you want
to turn your head and pretend that only *certain* laws apply... well,
you'll get what you ask for.

The big fact that gets left out of this equation is that illegals
receive about 5-7 times what an American would receive in wage
benefits (not counting taking the extra value of their Social Security
and Social Welfare out of the hands of American families) considering
what they make and expect to take or send back home with exchange
rates being what they are.

There is absolutely NO incentive for an increase in the minimum wage
as long as there is an unlimited supply of manpower willing to live
like refugees and accept the bare minimum wage.

If you want to consider yourself a Liberal Democrat and refuse to
support the American worker.... you are neither.
--


Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Southport, NC. http://myworkshop.idleplay.net/
-----------------
www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com - *Completion*Retention*Speed*
Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road
-----------------

If they pay a higher wage, either their profits are gone, or the price
of goods goes up to the consumer so much that they won't buy, and
again, there goes the profits.


That's how business operates, regardless of the products.

If Republicans lose the House, it will mean amnesty for 30,000,000Illegals.
 

basskisser wrote:
Bill Kearney wrote:
Damn, you are dumber than a post, huh? They can't find the labor to
pick the crops, period. Who will they hire? Idiot, indeed. You was
wrong, and still are.
And you apparently miss the larger issue of wages not be adjusted to fit
market demands. This whole argument about foreign workers is a smokescreen
clouding the real issue of wages being far too low. The days of racing to
the bottom to get illegals to do the work for next to nothing are rapidly
coming to a close. Wages will have to rise and that will certainly affect
market prices. But as they've been artifically low for over two decades
it's coming time to see them adjust. Blame yourselves for pretending you
could get everything for low prices, you can't and it's now becoming
painfully clear.

Smokescreen? Do you honestly think that CA farmers WANT 30% of their
profit rotting on the trees????


No, they don't. But, they have a problem that is of their own making.

If Republicans lose the House, it will mean amnesty for 30,000,000 Illegals.
 

Alotta Fagina wrote:
You wrote:

The bottom line is economic slavery for some more dark-skinned people.

Dark-skinned LAWBREAKERS, asshole. Why the **** are they subjecting
themselves to "economic slavery" in the US? Because their dark-skinned
amigos in Mexico give them a WORSE economy! Someone needs to blow your
****ed up moronic (Dave) head off.

It's a shame that you are too stupid to post or comment or debate
someone without childish name calling and petty insults. You do know
that you sound like an uneducated petty street criminal, don't you?

If Republicans lose the House, it will mean amnesty for 30,000,000Illegals.
 

basskisser wrote:
Alotta Fagina wrote:
You wrote:

The bottom line is economic slavery for some more dark-skinned people.
Dark-skinned LAWBREAKERS, asshole. Why the **** are they subjecting
themselves to "economic slavery" in the US? Because their dark-skinned
amigos in Mexico give them a WORSE economy! Someone needs to blow your
****ed up moronic (Dave) head off.

It's a shame that you are too stupid to post or comment or debate
someone without childish name calling and petty insults. You do know
that you sound like an uneducated petty street criminal, don't you?


Have you take over the job of rec.boats Sheriff?

If Republicans lose the House, it will mean amnesty for 30,000,000 Illegals.
 

On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 06:33:05 -0700, "fred" wrote:

snip

Whereas if the Republicans are able to continue to control both houses
and the executive, the present policy on illegals will continue in
farce.

Al Moore
DoD 734

If Republicans lose the House, it will mean amnesty for 30,000,000 Illegals.
 

Alotta Fagina wrote:
You wrote:


Alotta Fagina wrote:
You wrote:

The bottom line is economic slavery for some more dark-skinned people.

Dark-skinned LAWBREAKERS, asshole. Why the **** are they subjecting
themselves to "economic slavery" in the US? Because their dark-skinned
amigos in Mexico give them a WORSE economy! Someone needs to blow your
****ed up moronic (Dave) head off.

It's a shame that you are too stupid to post or comment or debate
someone without childish name calling and petty insults. You do know
that you sound like an uneducated petty street criminal, don't you?

Coming from you that's a compliment.

Ummmm, okay.....if you think that's a compliment, then you are dumber
than I previously thought.

If Republicans lose the House, it will mean amnesty for 30,000,000 Illegals.
 

Harry Krause wrote:
On 9/10/2006 7:53 PM, basskisser wrote:
Alotta Fagina wrote:
You wrote:

Alotta Fagina wrote:
You wrote:

The bottom line is economic slavery for some more dark-skinned people.
Dark-skinned LAWBREAKERS, asshole. Why the **** are they subjecting
themselves to "economic slavery" in the US? Because their dark-skinned
amigos in Mexico give them a WORSE economy! Someone needs to blow your
****ed up moronic (Dave) head off.
It's a shame that you are too stupid to post or comment or debate
someone without childish name calling and petty insults. You do know
that you sound like an uneducated petty street criminal, don't you?
Coming from you that's a compliment.

Ummmm, okay.....if you think that's a compliment, then you are dumber
than I previously thought.



Once again, I ask you: why are you responding to an "anonymous" a'hole?

Because, Harry. He himself IS also an "anonymous" a'hole.

.
 

..

.
 

..
wrong group

.
 

..

If Republicans lose the House, it will mean amnesty for 30,000,000Illegals.
 

Alotta Fagina wrote:
You wrote:


In article . com,
basskisser wrote:


Wasted fruit: Tons of pears, picked past their prime, rot in a field
near Lakeport, Calif. An estimated 30 percent of this year's pear crop
will not be harvested because of a lack of migrant laborers.

The jobs that even 30,000,000 illegal aliens won't do.

Guess the farmers are going to have to suck it up and make some
capitial equipment investment and get into the 1990s.


No, they'll get felons like Willie Nelson to cry to Congress and make
everybody else bail 'em out again. And again. And again.



Wait. There's a difference in trying to help small family-run farms and
big corporate farms that receive the bulk of farm subsidies. It's not
exactly the subsidies that are wrong, it's the administration of the
programs than shaft both family farms and the American taxpayer.

--
*fas-cism* (fash'iz'em) n. A system of government that exercises a dictatorship of the extreme right, typically through the merging of state and business leadership, together with belligerent nationalism.
-- The American Heritage Dictionary



"Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the president to explain to us what the exit strategy is...I think it's also important for the president to lay out a timetable as to how long they will be involved and when they will be withdrawn."
------George W. Bush to the Houston Chronicle, April 9th, 1999

.
 

please don't cross post

.
 

Chuck Gould wrote:
please don't cross post



Pot, kettle, black....?

.
 

BrianNZ wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:
please don't cross post



Pot, kettle, black....?

No. The fool who posted this political crap in rec.boats is not a
normal participant there.
When I dump political nonsense into whatever newsgroup you frequent,
that will be pot/kettle.black.

.
 

Chuck Gould wrote:
BrianNZ wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:
please don't cross post


Pot, kettle, black....?

No. The fool who posted this political crap in rec.boats is not a
normal participant there.
When I dump political nonsense into whatever newsgroup you frequent,
that will be pot/kettle.black.



:) Sorry....I just laugh when people cross post to tell off a
crossposter......there are NO 'normal' participants here....
(rec.motorcycles)

Do jetskis count as rec.boats?

.
 

Chuck Gould wrote:
please don't cross post




Hey, guy, talk to your own posters. I did not enter any other NGs into
the address; I posted here to misc.transport.trucking, and only here.
And replying to you, guy, I find that I am once again
"cross-posting." What's good for the goose is good for the duck: you
don't want to see my postings, delete your NG from the reply-to heading
if you reply to this.

--
*fas-cism* (fash'iz'em) n. A system of government that exercises a dictatorship of the extreme right, typically through the merging of state and business leadership, together with belligerent nationalism.
-- The American Heritage Dictionary



"Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the president to explain to us what the exit strategy is...I think it's also important for the president to lay out a timetable as to how long they will be involved and when they will be withdrawn."
------George W. Bush to the Houston Chronicle, April 9th, 1999

.
 

"BrianNZ" wrote in message
...
Chuck Gould wrote:
BrianNZ wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:
please don't cross post


Pot, kettle, black....?

No. The fool who posted this political crap in rec.boats is not a
normal participant there.
When I dump political nonsense into whatever newsgroup you frequent,
that will be pot/kettle.black.



:) Sorry....I just laugh when people cross post to tell off a
crossposter......there are NO 'normal' participants here....
(rec.motorcycles)

Do jetskis count as rec.boats?

No!