Deja Vu all over again.
 

Don White wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:

I see that the Jr. High School let you all go home for the weekend.



...and you were kept back for remedial attention?

Very witty Don. Did you think of that all by yourself or did you do what
you usually do and follow Harry's lead?

Deja Vu all over again.
 

Harry Krause wrote:
On 9/9/2006 6:59 PM, Don White wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
I see that the Jr. High School let you all go home for the weekend.



...and you were kept back for remedial attention?


I figured Bert for "antisocial" promotions. The teachers didn't want him
for another year.

It is more fun interacting with Joe Spare Bedroom than you or Don. You
and Don are just too juvenile.

Deja Vu all over again.
 

basskisser wrote:
Dan Krueger wrote:

basskisser wrote:


Dan Krueger wrote:


basskisser wrote:


JimH wrote:



"Don White" wrote in message
...



Here we go again.
Somebody has to teach these flyboys how to read a chart.
http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/natio...nfriendly.html



Sorry to hear about that Don. I am sure the US pilots involved in this
accident feel worse than you can believe and will have a hard time
forgetting it.


You could be right, Bipolar Boy!


Insert Kevin's signature phrase here --- "Grow up".


Not quite bright enough to show some originality, huh?


Why are you responding? Are you Kevin?


It's quite simple. A person, using google groups can respond to any
thread, whether or not it is a direct post to them. Understand? Take
for instance if you were to post a question to JimH, aka Bipolar Boy, I
could simply reply to it, just like I am replying to this post. Again,
you just aren't great at originality, are you?


Google groups have nothing to do with it. Any news reader can post to
the group.

"aren't great at originality"?? What does that have to do with this
thread or this group?

You are way out there, Kevin.

Deja Vu all over again.
 

basskisser wrote:

Dan Krueger wrote:

basskisser wrote:


JimH wrote:


"basskisser" wrote in message
egroups.com...


Don White wrote:



..and I wouldn't mind if Sir Chuck could at least be impartial.
He's actually worse than John these days. (ever see him say a word to
his west coast neighbours...such as Calif Bill?)
Surly someone as talented, experienced and knowledgeable and connected
as his self can understand that he loses all credibility if he's seen as
partial.

If you want to see him be partial, he's tried to chastise me for off
topic posting, etc., but says absolutely nothing to JimH when he does
the same thing! As a matter of fact, JimH can post nothing but a
slanderous, malicious post to me, and if I even DARE respond, I'll get
chastised.


You never answered my question from yesterday Kevin. Are you still beating
your wife and kids?


I'm not Kevin, so I don't know whether he is or not. But, if you are
talking to ME, then when you answer my question to you, then I'll
answer. The question was, you have posted the question in a form that
would make one think that you have some knowledge of me beating my wife
and kids. What IS that knowledge? You see, you aren't bright enough to
form it so as to not make you look like you have some evidence of such
ie: "still". If you were a man instead of a little jerkboy, then if you
had some shred of common decency and had knowledge of me doing such,
you'd contact the proper authorities. Or, perhaps you are projecting.
Is that why your wife is sick, from you beating her too much?


That's just sad.


But you find it perfectly acceptable when JimH does the exact same
thing, only worse huh? THAT is "sad".


Spoken like a typical five year old looking for a net cop. I would say
"grow up" but that's your line. Does one person's actions allow another
to follow?

What makes this even more ridiculous is that it's the internet. Your
response sounds like something I would hear from one of my employees..
"I know I was late but Sam is always late". That would be the real
world. This is the internet so it's just pathetic.

Deja Vu all over again.
 

basskisser wrote:

Dan Krueger wrote:

basskisser wrote:


Don White wrote:



..and I wouldn't mind if Sir Chuck could at least be impartial.
He's actually worse than John these days. (ever see him say a word to
his west coast neighbours...such as Calif Bill?)
Surly someone as talented, experienced and knowledgeable and connected
as his self can understand that he loses all credibility if he's seen as
partial.


If you want to see him be partial, he's tried to chastise me for off
topic posting, etc., but says absolutely nothing to JimH when he does
the same thing! As a matter of fact, JimH can post nothing but a
slanderous, malicious post to me, and if I even DARE respond, I'll get
chastised.


Sucks to be Kevin.


YOU'RE Kevin?? The mystery is solved!



Start with this: I use my name when I post. Try harder next time.

Deja Vu all over again.
 

Deja Vu all over again.
 

Don White wrote:

basskisser wrote:

Dan Krueger wrote:

basskisser wrote:


Don White wrote:



..and I wouldn't mind if Sir Chuck could at least be impartial.
He's actually worse than John these days. (ever see him say a word to
his west coast neighbours...such as Calif Bill?)
Surly someone as talented, experienced and knowledgeable and connected
as his self can understand that he loses all credibility if he's
seen as
partial.



If you want to see him be partial, he's tried to chastise me for off
topic posting, etc., but says absolutely nothing to JimH when he does
the same thing! As a matter of fact, JimH can post nothing but a
slanderous, malicious post to me, and if I even DARE respond, I'll get
chastised.


Sucks to be Kevin.



YOU'RE Kevin?? The mystery is solved!


I always thought his name was Freddy.

That wasn't funny 5 years ago. If you still like it, great.

Deja Vu all over again.
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
. ..
On 9/9/2006 5:13 PM, Bert Robbins wrote:


You are still the punching bag of the group. You have been abandoned and
or shuned by all of your friends. Why don't you stop being a JimH and be
a normal person.


Who left the cover off the septic tank so Bert could crawl out?

Holy Crap, Harry. Why do you continue to encourage this BS?

Eisboch

Deja Vu all over again.
 

Dan Krueger wrote:
wrote:

basskisser wrote:

Dan Krueger wrote:

basskisser wrote:


Don White wrote:



..and I wouldn't mind if Sir Chuck could at least be impartial.
He's actually worse than John these days. (ever see him say a word to
his west coast neighbours...such as Calif Bill?)
Surly someone as talented, experienced and knowledgeable and connected
as his self can understand that he loses all credibility if he's seen as
partial.


If you want to see him be partial, he's tried to chastise me for off
topic posting, etc., but says absolutely nothing to JimH when he does
the same thing! As a matter of fact, JimH can post nothing but a
slanderous, malicious post to me, and if I even DARE respond, I'll get
chastised.


Sucks to be Kevin.

YOU'RE Kevin?? The mystery is solved!



Wrong again.

His name is Dan.


Legally, it's Daniel.

And we here would presume that to be true., that is , except for one,
who uses some alias

Deja Vu all over again.
 

Bert Robbins wrote:
Don White wrote:

Bert Robbins wrote:


I see that the Jr. High School let you all go home for the weekend.



...and you were kept back for remedial attention?


Very witty Don.

Why thank you Bert.