On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 19:13:07 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 12:13:11 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

Gene Kearns wrote:
On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 11:11:21 -0400, Harry Krause penned the following
well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

Yeah, I know how it works. I just don't like the way it works. Too
annoying, involved, intricate, et cetera. And it sucks on email.

You may want to look at the way email filtering works. Totally
intuitive...though I still won't recommend the program until nested
folders....



Gene, T'bird presents any number of ways to filter email "intuitively."

What is it that "Agent" does that is important, significant and unique?

Stick with T'bird!
--
John

He asked a fair question.


Harry's rational for not using Agent was, "...Too annoying, involved,
intricate, et cetera." I discussed those.

Now he wants a comparison. As I don't use T'bird, that would be difficult,
annoying, involved, intricate, et cetera.

Besides, if Agent was too intricate, any comparison would be even more so.
--
John