Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"DSK" wrote in message
... The Commandant of the Coast Guard reports directly to Homeland Security. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi..._Org_Chart.jpg Did they get orders via Homeland Security? If so, why weren't some of the other branches of Homeland Security on the spot? DSK What other branches? As far as I can tell, "Homeland Security" is nothing but a bunch of suits. Do they own a few thousand personnel whose job it is to get wet & dirty? |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "DSK" wrote in message ... The Commandant of the Coast Guard reports directly to Homeland Security. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi..._Org_Chart.jpg Did they get orders via Homeland Security? If so, why weren't some of the other branches of Homeland Security on the spot? DSK What other branches? As far as I can tell, "Homeland Security" is nothing but a bunch of suits. Do they own a few thousand personnel whose job it is to get wet & dirty? That's the problem. All bark and no bite. Our military is the only part of our government that has the men, resources, chain of command, and funding to handle disasters of that magnitude. Somehow, authority over a portion of that military (the Reserves or the Guard) needs to be given to DHS. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
So where is...................... | General | |||
Harry fails to report 4 point bump in Rasmussen bush approval | General | |||
Bad day on the Chesapeake Bay! | General | |||
OT Bush is certainly no Reagan | General | |||
Sailing Cuba | Cruising |