Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "thunder" wrote in message ... On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:17:37 +0000, NOYB wrote: As long as he is near 50%, it makes it easier for Diebold to steal another election without anybody getting suspicious...or at least that's what the moonbats over at the liberal blogs think. And if he loses, http://www.shreveporttimes.com/apps/...608200322/1002 All this time, I thought Republicans believed in states rights. Damned if you do, and damned if you don't. Bush got criticized to holy hell for not responding more quickly after Katrina. And now you're citing an article that states unequivocally that Gov. Blanco resisted the White House's urging to turn control of the guard over to Federal authority!?! I think the President ought to have the authority to take over the National Guard during "a serious natural or man-made disaster, accident, or catastrophe that occurs in the United States, its territories and possessions, or Puerto Rico." Afterall, the Guard is paid for by revenue from Federal taxes. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
So where is...................... | General | |||
Harry fails to report 4 point bump in Rasmussen bush approval | General | |||
Bad day on the Chesapeake Bay! | General | |||
OT Bush is certainly no Reagan | General | |||
Sailing Cuba | Cruising |