Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 21:57:03 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:


"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

JimH wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 08:03:12 -0400, " JimH" not telling you @
pffftt.com
wrote:


"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
groups.com...

JR North wrote:
They should shoot that rear shot at the bottom of the page with
about a
2 foot following sea.
JR


If a following sea broke across the swimstep there could be some
flooding of the cockpit, but not as much as you might expect. ( There
is a huge, recessed deck drain just outside the companionway door).
The
sunpad and locker substitutes for a traditional transom, and the
passages to port and starboard are partially protected with
what would be, in effect, "reduced flow" transom doors. If the
following sea wasn't breaking, the boat would just ride up and over
the
top like any other and the increased pressure and effect on steering
would all be taking place below the waterline.

Tha said, the most natual fit for this boat would be somewhat
sheltered
waters. I don't think it was really intended to slop around in 30-kt
winds and 5-foot chop.


A shame that a 32 footer can handle only sheltered water because the
cockpit
will flood, especially in following seas. I can't seem to find where
you
mention that in your review though. ;-)


Do you never tire of it?


John, it is truly a shame that your *contribution* to the NG has sunk to
Kevin's level.

Hey, Jim, I love it how you are such a little ****ing cry baby!!!! Care
to wager that I'm not Kevin? Grow up.

If you're not Kevin, then why do you reply to all messages in which Jim
refers to Kevin? Are you friends with Kevin?

You know what they say - there are only six degrees of separation
between anybody and Kevin.

Bacon that is - Kevin Bacon. :)

Ah, maybe THAT'S what the local idiots are referring to!