Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,117
Default A boat likely to be of interest


JimH wrote:
No one said anything about open bluewater or offshore use Chuck. You said
the boat was built only for calm sheltered water as the boat will take on
water in rough or following seas. A shame a 32 footer is not built to take
on some moderately rough conditions. And that was my point because in your
review you never said anything about these deficiencies. ;-)


You *completely* distorted my comments, and then crafted an argument
based not on my comments but on your own distortion. (You really need
to switch to a different type of radio programming).

I said: (cut and paste from the post)

"Tha said, the most natual fit for this boat would be somewhat
sheltered
waters. I don't think it was really intended to slop around in 30-kt
winds and 5-foot chop. You would want to be off the water if you owned
this boat- as well as most other boats, when something nasty like that
kicks up."


You said I said:

"You said the boat was built only for calm, sheltered water as the boat
will take on water in rough or following seas"


Not much point to continue to defend a position that I never stated in
the first place, is there?

I stand by my original comment quoted above. What that has to do with
what you tried to read into it, I'll never know.

  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,315
Default A boat likely to be of interest


"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
ups.com...

JimH wrote:
No one said anything about open bluewater or offshore use Chuck. You
said
the boat was built only for calm sheltered water as the boat will take on
water in rough or following seas. A shame a 32 footer is not built to
take
on some moderately rough conditions. And that was my point because in
your
review you never said anything about these deficiencies. ;-)


You *completely* distorted my comments, and then crafted an argument
based not on my comments but on your own distortion. (You really need
to switch to a different type of radio programming).

I said: (cut and paste from the post)

"Tha said, the most natual fit for this boat would be somewhat
sheltered
waters. I don't think it was really intended to slop around in 30-kt
winds and 5-foot chop. You would want to be off the water if you owned
this boat- as well as most other boats, when something nasty like that
kicks up."


Sorry if I distorted things. I did conclude though that it is a shame that
this 32 foot boat cannot handle open water or 5 foot seas without the fear
of flooding the deck. ;-)

Poor engineering.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A Recreational Boating Message Skipper General 7 October 12th 05 10:25 PM
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ [email protected] General 0 September 29th 04 05:19 AM
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ [email protected] General 0 March 18th 04 09:15 AM
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ [email protected] General 0 February 16th 04 10:02 AM
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ [email protected] General 0 January 16th 04 09:19 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017